Marcia L. Colish (1937–2024)

IF 0.6 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1353/jhi.2024.a933853
Cary J. Nederman
{"title":"Marcia L. Colish (1937–2024)","authors":"Cary J. Nederman","doi":"10.1353/jhi.2024.a933853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Marcia L. Colish</em> (1937–2024) <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Cary J. Nederman </li> </ul> <p>The death of Marcia L. Colish on April 9, 2024, a little shy of her 87th birthday, comes as a deep blow to all intellectual historians, especially those with close ties to the <em>Journal of the History of Ideas</em>. Widely known for her penetrating intelligence, her unfailing support of colleagues and students alike, and her incisive interventions on a wide variety of topics, her passing deprives our community of a consummate scholar and an exemplary human being. She was not only respected, but truly beloved.</p> <p>Colish’s association with <em>JHI</em> runs back more than a half-century. She first contributed an article here (on Vives) in 1962 while still pursuing her doctorate at Yale, in the days when graduate students were generally not expected to publish before completing their degrees. She went on to contribute several more papers to the journal, including signal work on Machiavelli and her 2015 Arthur O. Lovejoy Lecture on infant baptism. Her presentation of the latter is an event memorable to many of us present in the audience. Colish joined <em>JHI</em>’s Board of Editors in 1986, was chosen as a member of the Board of Directors in 1997, and was elected its Vice President in 2005. In all of these roles, she cheerfully accepted time-consuming tasks, such as organizing the journal’s ongoing fundraising campaign and reviewing numerous manuscripts submitted for publication (including at least one by yours truly, then a neophyte, in the late 1980s).</p> <p>The range of Colish’s own scholarly inquiries and the depth of her learning were truly remarkable. In an age when disciplinary specialization (and sub-specialization) and the ever-narrowing foci of knowledge acquisition are all but <em>de rigueur</em>, she cast a broad net over centuries (indeed, more than a millennium) of debate in the fields of epistemology, theology, cultural history, literary aesthetics, and political philosophy. The wide scope of her vision was already on display in her Yale dissertation, published in 1968 by University of Nebraska Press (with a second, revised edition released in 1983), in which she effortlessly spanned the era from the fifth to the fourteenth century, through late antique Neoplatonism, monastic learning, scholastic Aristotelianism, and Renaissance Humanism. The protagonists Colish highlighted in this volume—especially Augustine, Anselm, Aquinas, <strong>[End Page iii]</strong> Dante—became among her interlocutors over a career that witnessed the production of two weighty multivolume studies: <em>The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages</em> (Brill, 1985, an updated edition of which appeared in 1990) and <em>Peter Lombard</em> (Brill, 1993), the latter of which was awarded the Medieval Academy of America’s prestigious Haskins Prize.</p> <p>In my view, the crowning achievement of Colish’s long and storied career was <em>Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition, 400–1400</em> (Yale, 1999), a stunning synthesis of the many threads of her scholarship. One great virtue of this volume is the scale of its readership. On the one hand, it is a work of such erudition that it must be found on the bookshelf of any serious scholar of the history of ideas during the Middle Ages. On the other hand, it is written in a style so clear and accessible that even undergraduates (and the general reading public, for that matter) might benefit from it. (Colish once remarked to me, perhaps only half joking, that the book paid for the little BMW in which she used to tear around.) She wrote several other volumes as well, all of which remain greatly admired.</p> <p>Befitting her esteemed status in the profession, Colish was feted with numerous accolades from all quarters, including doctorates <em>honoris causa</em>, prominent lectureships, and major fellowships. She was inducted as a Fellow of the Medieval Academy in 1988, and served in leading roles in that organization, which culminated in her election as President in 1991–92 (only the fourth woman to occupy that office over the course of the Academy’s century-long history).</p> <p>Colish was also a legendary teacher during her nearly four decades at Oberlin College, from which she retired in 2001 as the Frederick B. Artz Professor of History. Those fortunate enough to study under her (I, alas, was not...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":47274,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2024.a933853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Marcia L. Colish (1937–2024)
  • Cary J. Nederman

The death of Marcia L. Colish on April 9, 2024, a little shy of her 87th birthday, comes as a deep blow to all intellectual historians, especially those with close ties to the Journal of the History of Ideas. Widely known for her penetrating intelligence, her unfailing support of colleagues and students alike, and her incisive interventions on a wide variety of topics, her passing deprives our community of a consummate scholar and an exemplary human being. She was not only respected, but truly beloved.

Colish’s association with JHI runs back more than a half-century. She first contributed an article here (on Vives) in 1962 while still pursuing her doctorate at Yale, in the days when graduate students were generally not expected to publish before completing their degrees. She went on to contribute several more papers to the journal, including signal work on Machiavelli and her 2015 Arthur O. Lovejoy Lecture on infant baptism. Her presentation of the latter is an event memorable to many of us present in the audience. Colish joined JHI’s Board of Editors in 1986, was chosen as a member of the Board of Directors in 1997, and was elected its Vice President in 2005. In all of these roles, she cheerfully accepted time-consuming tasks, such as organizing the journal’s ongoing fundraising campaign and reviewing numerous manuscripts submitted for publication (including at least one by yours truly, then a neophyte, in the late 1980s).

The range of Colish’s own scholarly inquiries and the depth of her learning were truly remarkable. In an age when disciplinary specialization (and sub-specialization) and the ever-narrowing foci of knowledge acquisition are all but de rigueur, she cast a broad net over centuries (indeed, more than a millennium) of debate in the fields of epistemology, theology, cultural history, literary aesthetics, and political philosophy. The wide scope of her vision was already on display in her Yale dissertation, published in 1968 by University of Nebraska Press (with a second, revised edition released in 1983), in which she effortlessly spanned the era from the fifth to the fourteenth century, through late antique Neoplatonism, monastic learning, scholastic Aristotelianism, and Renaissance Humanism. The protagonists Colish highlighted in this volume—especially Augustine, Anselm, Aquinas, [End Page iii] Dante—became among her interlocutors over a career that witnessed the production of two weighty multivolume studies: The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages (Brill, 1985, an updated edition of which appeared in 1990) and Peter Lombard (Brill, 1993), the latter of which was awarded the Medieval Academy of America’s prestigious Haskins Prize.

In my view, the crowning achievement of Colish’s long and storied career was Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition, 400–1400 (Yale, 1999), a stunning synthesis of the many threads of her scholarship. One great virtue of this volume is the scale of its readership. On the one hand, it is a work of such erudition that it must be found on the bookshelf of any serious scholar of the history of ideas during the Middle Ages. On the other hand, it is written in a style so clear and accessible that even undergraduates (and the general reading public, for that matter) might benefit from it. (Colish once remarked to me, perhaps only half joking, that the book paid for the little BMW in which she used to tear around.) She wrote several other volumes as well, all of which remain greatly admired.

Befitting her esteemed status in the profession, Colish was feted with numerous accolades from all quarters, including doctorates honoris causa, prominent lectureships, and major fellowships. She was inducted as a Fellow of the Medieval Academy in 1988, and served in leading roles in that organization, which culminated in her election as President in 1991–92 (only the fourth woman to occupy that office over the course of the Academy’s century-long history).

Colish was also a legendary teacher during her nearly four decades at Oberlin College, from which she retired in 2001 as the Frederick B. Artz Professor of History. Those fortunate enough to study under her (I, alas, was not...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玛西娅-科利什(1937-2024)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: Marcia L. Colish (1937-2024) Cary J. Nederman Marcia L. Colish 于 2024 年 4 月 9 日去世,离她的 87 岁生日还差一点。她以其敏锐的洞察力、对同事和学生不遗余力的支持以及对各种主题的精辟论述而广为人知,她的去世使我们的学术界失去了一位杰出的学者和模范人物。她不仅受人尊敬,而且深受爱戴。科利什与 JHI 的渊源可以追溯到半个多世纪以前。1962 年,当她还在耶鲁大学攻读博士学位时,她就在这里发表了第一篇文章(关于维维斯),当时一般不要求研究生在完成学位之前发表文章。之后,她又为该期刊撰写了多篇论文,其中包括关于马基雅弗利的信号作品,以及她在2015年关于婴儿洗礼的阿瑟-O-洛夫乔伊讲座(Arthur O. Lovejoy Lecture)。她对后者的演讲令我们在场的许多听众记忆犹新。科利什于 1986 年加入 JHI 编辑委员会,1997 年被选为董事会成员,2005 年当选为副主席。在担任所有这些职务期间,她都乐于接受费时费力的任务,例如组织期刊正在进行的筹款活动,审阅大量投稿(包括至少一篇由我本人在上世纪 80 年代末投稿的稿件,当时我还是个新手)。科利什本人的学术研究范围之广、学识之深确实令人惊叹。在一个学科专业化(和亚专业化)以及知识获取的焦点日益狭窄的时代,她在认识论、神学、文化史、文学美学和政治哲学等领域的几个世纪(实际上超过千年)的争论中撒下了一张广阔的网。在她的耶鲁大学毕业论文(1968 年由内布拉斯加大学出版社出版,1983 年推出第二修订版)中,就已经展示了她广阔的视野,她毫不费力地跨越了从 5 世纪到 14 世纪的时代,经历了古代晚期的新柏拉图主义、修道院学说、学派亚里士多德主义和文艺复兴时期的人文主义。科利什在本卷中重点介绍的主人公--尤其是奥古斯丁、安瑟伦、阿奎那和但丁--在她的职业生涯中成为了她的对话者,并出版了两部厚重的多卷本研究著作:从古代到中世纪早期的斯多葛传统》(Brill,1985 年,1990 年出版增订版)和《彼得-伦巴第》(Brill,1993 年),后者获得了美国中世纪学院著名的哈斯金斯奖。在我看来,科利什漫长而充满传奇色彩的职业生涯的最高成就是《西方思想传统的中世纪基础,400-1400 年》(耶鲁大学,1999 年),这是她众多学术成果的惊人结晶。这本书的一大优点是读者规模宏大。一方面,这是一部博学的著作,任何认真研究中世纪思想史的学者都必须将其放在书架上。另一方面,它的写作风格清晰易懂,即使是本科生(以及普通读者)也能从中受益。(科利什曾经半开玩笑地对我说,这本书为她以前开着的那辆小宝马赚了不少钱)。她还写了其他几本书,这些书都深受读者喜爱。科利什在业界享有崇高的地位,因此获得了来自各方的无数赞誉,包括名誉博士、著名讲师和重要奖学金。1988 年,她被选为中世纪学院院士,并在该组织中担任领导职务,最终于 1991-92 年当选为主席(在该学院长达一个世纪的历史中,她是担任该职务的第四位女性)。科利什还是一位传奇教师,她在欧柏林学院任教近四十年,2001 年以弗雷德里克-B-阿茨历史教授的身份退休。那些有幸师从她的学生(可惜我没有...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.
期刊最新文献
Antiquarianism, Local Traditions, and Urban Identity in the Early Modern Netherlands: The Controversy about the City of the Nervii Marcia L. Colish (1937–2024) Sieyès's Constitutional Jury, the Pennsylvania Council of Censors, and the Debate on the Conservative Power in the French Revolution Seeing the Future through a Kaleidoscope: Uses of Morphological Type in Michelet's National and Natural Histories Women and Intellectual History in the Twentieth Century, Part One: Rethinking the "Origins" of US Intellectual History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1