Roman Witold Ingarden’s discussions on artistic style: A contribution

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1007/s11212-024-09650-5
Beata Garlej
{"title":"Roman Witold Ingarden’s discussions on artistic style: A contribution","authors":"Beata Garlej","doi":"10.1007/s11212-024-09650-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present article attempts to reconstruct Polish philosopher and aesthetician Roman Witold Ingarden’s views concerning his understanding of the concept of artistic style. Starting from the hypotheses provided by the content of the outline of his ultimately unwritten work, <i>Poetics</i>, I have chosen selected threads of the discussions held by Ingarden in Lviv before the war, supplemented by the content of the phenomenologist’s lectures from the 1960s, as essential substantive background. Analyzing the material indicated, I demonstrate that it is appropriate for Ingarden’s understanding of artistic style to correlate this concept with the category of aesthetic concretization. Consequently, I draw a conclusion as to the primary role of some aspects of a literary work – appearances, which allow us to inquire into the properties of artistic style practically as a result of their function of decorativeness and polyphony. A condensed comparative analysis of the two functions, as related to excerpts from Gustave Flaubert’s <i>Madame Bovary</i> and Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz’s <i>Insatiability</i>, concludes the account of Ingarden’s conception of artistic style, which turns out to be a unique aphenomenal phenomenon.</p>","PeriodicalId":43055,"journal":{"name":"Studies in East European Thought","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in East European Thought","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09650-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article attempts to reconstruct Polish philosopher and aesthetician Roman Witold Ingarden’s views concerning his understanding of the concept of artistic style. Starting from the hypotheses provided by the content of the outline of his ultimately unwritten work, Poetics, I have chosen selected threads of the discussions held by Ingarden in Lviv before the war, supplemented by the content of the phenomenologist’s lectures from the 1960s, as essential substantive background. Analyzing the material indicated, I demonstrate that it is appropriate for Ingarden’s understanding of artistic style to correlate this concept with the category of aesthetic concretization. Consequently, I draw a conclusion as to the primary role of some aspects of a literary work – appearances, which allow us to inquire into the properties of artistic style practically as a result of their function of decorativeness and polyphony. A condensed comparative analysis of the two functions, as related to excerpts from Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary and Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz’s Insatiability, concludes the account of Ingarden’s conception of artistic style, which turns out to be a unique aphenomenal phenomenon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Roman Witold Ingarden 关于艺术风格的讨论:贡献
本文试图重构波兰哲学家和美学家罗曼-维托尔德-英伽登关于他对艺术风格概念的理解的观点。从英伽登最终未成书的著作《诗学》大纲内容所提供的假设出发,我从英伽登战前在利沃夫举行的讨论中选取了一些线索,并以这位现象学家 20 世纪 60 年代的演讲内容作为补充,作为重要的实质性背景。通过对材料的分析,我证明了将艺术风格这一概念与审美具体化范畴联系起来是符合英伽登对艺术风格的理解的。因此,我得出结论,文学作品的某些方面--表象--的主要作用,由于其装饰性和复调性的功能,我们可以对艺术风格的特性进行实际探究。英伽登的艺术风格概念是一种独特的表象现象,通过对古斯塔夫-福楼拜的《包法利夫人》和斯坦尼斯瓦夫-伊格纳西-维特凯维奇的《贪得无厌》节选中的内容进行比较分析,对这两种功能进行了精炼的比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Studies in East European Thought (SEET) provides a forum for impartial scholarly discussion of philosophical thought and intellectual history of East and Central Europe, Russia, as well as post-Soviet states. SEET offers a venue for philosophical dialogue in a variety of relevant fields of study. Predominantly a philosophical journal, SEET welcomes work that crosses established boundaries among disciplines whether by bringing other disciplines to respond to traditional philosophical questions or by using philosophical reflection to address specific disciplinary issues. The journal publishes original papers by scholars working in the field without discriminating them based on their geographical origin and nationality. The editorial team considers quality of work to be the sole criterion of publication. In addition to original scholarly essays, SEET publishes translations of philosophical texts not previously available in the West, as well as book reviews. * A forum for scholarly discussion on philosophical thought and intellectual history of East and Central Europe, Russia, and post-Soviet states * Includes analytic, comparative, and historical studies of thinkers, philosophical and intellectual schools and traditions * In addition to original papers, publishes translations and book reviews * Although formatting is not crucial at the review stage, authors are strongly advised to refer to the Submission Guidelines of SEET to which articles accepted for publication must conform
期刊最新文献
Syntax and temporality in the photographic thinking of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Bruno Schulz Georges Florovsky on nuclear restraint and responsibility: introduction to Florovsky’s letter Georges Florovsky: Letter to Davis McCaughey Russian pseudo-conservatism in an international context The role of gossip and money in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Insulted and Injured, The Idiot and Evdokiia Rostopchina’s “Rank and Money” («Chiny i Den’gi» (1838))
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1