The impact of ambient noise sources in subsurface models estimated from noise correlation waveforms

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Journal International Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggae259
Eduardo Valero Cano, Andreas Fichtner, Daniel Peter, P Martin Mai
{"title":"The impact of ambient noise sources in subsurface models estimated from noise correlation waveforms","authors":"Eduardo Valero Cano, Andreas Fichtner, Daniel Peter, P Martin Mai","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Cross-correlations of seismic ambient noise are frequently used to image Earth structure. Usually, tomographic studies assume that noise sources are uniformly distributed and interpret noise correlations as empirical Green’s functions. However, previous research suggests that this assumption can introduce errors in the estimated models, especially when noise correlation waveforms are inverted. In this paper, we investigate changes in subsurface models inferred from noise correlation waveforms depending on whether the noise source distribution is considered to be uniform. To this end, we set up numerical experiments that mimic a tomographic study in Southern California exploiting ambient noise generated in the Pacific Ocean. Our results show that if the distribution of noise sources is deemed uniform instead of being numerically represented in the wave simulations, the misfit of the estimated models increases. In our experiments, the model misfit increase ranges between 5 % and 21 %, depending on the heterogeneity of the noise source distribution. This indicates that assuming uniform noise sources introduces source-dependent model errors. Since the location of noise sources may change over time, these errors are also time-dependent. In order to mitigate these errors, it is necessary to account for the noise source distribution. The spatial extent to which noise sources must be considered depends on the propagation distance of the ambient noise wavefield. If only sources near the study area are considered, model errors may arise.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Cross-correlations of seismic ambient noise are frequently used to image Earth structure. Usually, tomographic studies assume that noise sources are uniformly distributed and interpret noise correlations as empirical Green’s functions. However, previous research suggests that this assumption can introduce errors in the estimated models, especially when noise correlation waveforms are inverted. In this paper, we investigate changes in subsurface models inferred from noise correlation waveforms depending on whether the noise source distribution is considered to be uniform. To this end, we set up numerical experiments that mimic a tomographic study in Southern California exploiting ambient noise generated in the Pacific Ocean. Our results show that if the distribution of noise sources is deemed uniform instead of being numerically represented in the wave simulations, the misfit of the estimated models increases. In our experiments, the model misfit increase ranges between 5 % and 21 %, depending on the heterogeneity of the noise source distribution. This indicates that assuming uniform noise sources introduces source-dependent model errors. Since the location of noise sources may change over time, these errors are also time-dependent. In order to mitigate these errors, it is necessary to account for the noise source distribution. The spatial extent to which noise sources must be considered depends on the propagation distance of the ambient noise wavefield. If only sources near the study area are considered, model errors may arise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据噪声相关波形估算的地下模型中环境噪声源的影响
摘要 地震环境噪声的交叉相关性常用于地球结构成像。通常,层析成像研究假定噪声源是均匀分布的,并将噪声相关性解释为经验格林函数。然而,以往的研究表明,这种假设可能会在估计模型中引入误差,尤其是当噪声相关波形被反转时。在本文中,我们研究了根据噪声源分布是否被视为均匀,从噪声相关波形推断出的地下模型的变化。为此,我们在南加州利用太平洋产生的环境噪声进行了模拟层析成像研究的数值实验。结果表明,如果噪声源的分布被认为是均匀的,而不是在波浪模拟中用数值表示,那么估计模型的误差就会增大。在我们的实验中,根据噪声源分布的异质性,模型拟合失准率增加了 5% 到 21%。这表明,假设噪声源均匀分布,会带来与噪声源有关的模型误差。由于噪声源的位置可能会随时间发生变化,因此这些误差也与时间有关。为了减少这些误差,有必要考虑噪声源的分布。必须考虑噪声源的空间范围取决于环境噪声波场的传播距离。如果只考虑研究区域附近的噪声源,可能会产生模型误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Modelling of non-linear elastic constitutive relationship and numerical simulation of rocks based on the Preisach-Mayergoyz space model Marginal stability analyses for thermochemical convection and its implications for the dynamics of continental lithosphere and core-mantle boundary regions Deep neural helmholtz operators for 3D elastic wave propagation and inversion Event locations: Speeding up grid searches using quadratic interpolation Internal deformation of the North Andean Sliver in Ecuador-southern Colombia observed by InSAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1