Marginal stability analyses for thermochemical convection and its implications for the dynamics of continental lithosphere and core-mantle boundary regions

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Journal International Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggae340
Shunjie Han, Shijie Zhong
{"title":"Marginal stability analyses for thermochemical convection and its implications for the dynamics of continental lithosphere and core-mantle boundary regions","authors":"Shunjie Han, Shijie Zhong","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Significant compositional differences may exist in the lithospheric mantle and above the core-mantle boundary (CMB) relative to the ambient mantle. The intrinsic density differences may affect the development of thermal boundary layer (TBL) instabilities associated with lithospheric delamination and formation of thermochemical plumes. In this study, we explored the instability of two-layer thermochemical fluid using two different techniques: marginal stability analysis with a propagator-matrix method and finite element modeling. We investigated both the instabilities in lithospheric mantle (i.e., lithospheric instability) and the mantle above the CMB (i.e., plume-forming instability) using a background temperature Tbg(z) with the TBL. For lithospheric instability, we found that two-layer fluid with free-slip boundary conditions mainly undergoes the same three different convective modes (i.e., two oscillatory convection modes and one layered convection regime) as that with no-slip boundary condition reported in Jaupart et al., (2007). However, with free-slip boundary conditions, the transitions between these convection modes occur at larger values of buoyancy number B. Free-slip boundary conditions lead to smaller critical Rayleigh number Rac, but larger convective wavelength and oscillation frequency ωc, compared with those with no-slip boundary conditions. Our numerical modeling results demonstrate that Rac and ωc predicted from the classical marginal stability analyses using Tbg(z) with TBL temperature may have significant errors when the oscillatory period is comparable with or larger than the timescale of lithospheric thermal diffusion that causes Tbg(z) to vary with time significantly. In this case, using a more gently sloped background temperature profile ignoring the TBL temperature, the stability analysis predicts more accurate stability conditions, thus presenting an effective remedy to the stability analysis. For plume-forming instability, because of the reduced viscosity in the hot and compositionally dense bottom layer, the transition to the layered convection occurs at significantly smaller B values, and in the oscillatory convection regime, Rac is larger but ωc is smaller, compared with those for lithospheric instability. Finally, our study provides a successful benchmark of numerical models of thermochemical convection by comparing Rac and ωc from numerical models with those from the marginal stability analysis.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Significant compositional differences may exist in the lithospheric mantle and above the core-mantle boundary (CMB) relative to the ambient mantle. The intrinsic density differences may affect the development of thermal boundary layer (TBL) instabilities associated with lithospheric delamination and formation of thermochemical plumes. In this study, we explored the instability of two-layer thermochemical fluid using two different techniques: marginal stability analysis with a propagator-matrix method and finite element modeling. We investigated both the instabilities in lithospheric mantle (i.e., lithospheric instability) and the mantle above the CMB (i.e., plume-forming instability) using a background temperature Tbg(z) with the TBL. For lithospheric instability, we found that two-layer fluid with free-slip boundary conditions mainly undergoes the same three different convective modes (i.e., two oscillatory convection modes and one layered convection regime) as that with no-slip boundary condition reported in Jaupart et al., (2007). However, with free-slip boundary conditions, the transitions between these convection modes occur at larger values of buoyancy number B. Free-slip boundary conditions lead to smaller critical Rayleigh number Rac, but larger convective wavelength and oscillation frequency ωc, compared with those with no-slip boundary conditions. Our numerical modeling results demonstrate that Rac and ωc predicted from the classical marginal stability analyses using Tbg(z) with TBL temperature may have significant errors when the oscillatory period is comparable with or larger than the timescale of lithospheric thermal diffusion that causes Tbg(z) to vary with time significantly. In this case, using a more gently sloped background temperature profile ignoring the TBL temperature, the stability analysis predicts more accurate stability conditions, thus presenting an effective remedy to the stability analysis. For plume-forming instability, because of the reduced viscosity in the hot and compositionally dense bottom layer, the transition to the layered convection occurs at significantly smaller B values, and in the oscillatory convection regime, Rac is larger but ωc is smaller, compared with those for lithospheric instability. Finally, our study provides a successful benchmark of numerical models of thermochemical convection by comparing Rac and ωc from numerical models with those from the marginal stability analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热化学对流的边际稳定性分析及其对大陆岩石圈和地核-地幔边界区域动力学的影响
摘要 相对于环境地幔,岩石圈地幔和地核-地幔边界(CMB)上方可能存在显著的成分差异。内在密度差异可能会影响与岩石圈分层和热化学羽流形成相关的热边界层(TBL)不稳定性的发展。在这项研究中,我们使用两种不同的技术探索了双层热化学流体的不稳定性:使用传播矩阵法进行边际稳定性分析和有限元建模。我们利用 TBL 的背景温度 Tbg(z),研究了岩石圈地幔的不稳定性(即岩石圈不稳定性)和 CMB 以上地幔的不稳定性(即羽状不稳定性)。对于岩石圈不稳定性,我们发现自由滑动边界条件下的两层流体主要经历三种不同的对流模式(即两种振荡对流模式和一种分层对流机制),与 Jaupart 等人(2007 年)报告的无滑动边界条件下的对流模式相同。与无滑动边界条件相比,自由滑动边界条件导致临界瑞利数 Rac 变小,但对流波长和振荡频率 ωc 变大。我们的数值建模结果表明,当振荡周期与岩石圈热扩散的时间尺度相当或大于导致Tbg(z)随时间显著变化的时间尺度时,使用Tbg(z)与TBL温度进行经典边际稳定性分析所预测的Rac和ωc可能会有很大误差。在这种情况下,使用一个忽略 TBL 温度的更平缓倾斜的背景温度曲线,稳定性分析就能预测出更准确的稳定性条件,从而为稳定性分析提供了一个有效的补救措施。对于羽状不稳定性,由于热的和成分致密的底层粘度降低,向分层对流的过渡发生在明显较小的B值,在振荡对流机制中,与岩石圈不稳定性相比,Rac较大,但ωc较小。最后,我们的研究通过比较数值模型的 Rac 和 ωc 与边际稳定性分析的结果,为热化学对流的数值模型提供了一个成功的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Modelling of non-linear elastic constitutive relationship and numerical simulation of rocks based on the Preisach-Mayergoyz space model Marginal stability analyses for thermochemical convection and its implications for the dynamics of continental lithosphere and core-mantle boundary regions Deep neural helmholtz operators for 3D elastic wave propagation and inversion Event locations: Speeding up grid searches using quadratic interpolation Internal deformation of the North Andean Sliver in Ecuador-southern Colombia observed by InSAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1