Generative AI and the future of equality norms

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105906
John Danaher
{"title":"Generative AI and the future of equality norms","authors":"John Danaher","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article will consider the disruptive impact of generative AI on moral beliefs and practices associated with equality, particularly equality of opportunity. It will first outline a framework for understanding the mechanisms through which generative AI can alter moral beliefs and practices. It will argue that actual and perceived cognitive ability is one of the determinants of social outcomes in modern information economies, and that one of the potential impacts of generative AI is on the distribution of this ability. Emerging, tentative, evidence suggests that generative AI currently displays an ‘inverse skills bias’, which favours those with less actual and perceived cognitive ability. This could have a disruptive impact on current norms of equality of opportunity, particularly with respect to the means and the purpose of such norms. The longer-term impact of generative AI on equality norms is less clear. Generative AI may shift the entire focus of equality norms or deprioritise the value of equality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001926/pdfft?md5=3c72adf432fd4724dc5089d5d1bb69b9&pid=1-s2.0-S0010027724001926-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will consider the disruptive impact of generative AI on moral beliefs and practices associated with equality, particularly equality of opportunity. It will first outline a framework for understanding the mechanisms through which generative AI can alter moral beliefs and practices. It will argue that actual and perceived cognitive ability is one of the determinants of social outcomes in modern information economies, and that one of the potential impacts of generative AI is on the distribution of this ability. Emerging, tentative, evidence suggests that generative AI currently displays an ‘inverse skills bias’, which favours those with less actual and perceived cognitive ability. This could have a disruptive impact on current norms of equality of opportunity, particularly with respect to the means and the purpose of such norms. The longer-term impact of generative AI on equality norms is less clear. Generative AI may shift the entire focus of equality norms or deprioritise the value of equality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能与平等准则的未来
本文将探讨生成式人工智能对与平等,尤其是机会平等相关的道德信念和实践的破坏性影响。首先,文章将概述一个框架,以了解生成式人工智能改变道德信念和实践的机制。它将论证,在现代信息经济中,实际和感知的认知能力是社会结果的决定因素之一,而生成性人工智能的潜在影响之一是对这种能力的分配。新出现的初步证据表明,生成式人工智能目前显示出一种 "反向技能偏差",有利于那些实际和感知认知能力较低的人。这可能会对当前的机会均等准则产生破坏性影响,特别是在这种准则的手段和目的方面。生成式人工智能对平等准则的长期影响还不太清楚。生成式人工智能可能会转移整个平等规范的重点,或将平等的价值置于次要地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
The role of exceptions in children's and adults' judgments about generic statements. Partisan language in a polarized world: In-group language provides reputational benefits to speakers while polarizing audiences What's left of the leftward bias in scene viewing? Lateral asymmetries in information processing during early search guidance Language enables the acquisition of distinct sensorimotor memories for speech Morality on the road: Should machine drivers be more utilitarian than human drivers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1