Treatment-Switching Adjustment of Overall Survival in CheckMate 227 Part 1 Evaluating First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.06.005
Martin Reck , Tuli De , Luis Paz-Ares , Mark Edmondson-Jones , Yong Yuan , Georgia Yates , Roberto Zoffoli , Mohammad Ashraf Chaudhary , Adam Lee , Nebibe Varol , John R. Penrod
{"title":"Treatment-Switching Adjustment of Overall Survival in CheckMate 227 Part 1 Evaluating First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer","authors":"Martin Reck ,&nbsp;Tuli De ,&nbsp;Luis Paz-Ares ,&nbsp;Mark Edmondson-Jones ,&nbsp;Yong Yuan ,&nbsp;Georgia Yates ,&nbsp;Roberto Zoffoli ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ashraf Chaudhary ,&nbsp;Adam Lee ,&nbsp;Nebibe Varol ,&nbsp;John R. Penrod","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826) evaluated first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or &lt; 1% and no <em>EGFR</em>/<em>ALK</em> alterations. However, many patients randomized to chemotherapy received subsequent immunotherapy. Here, overall survival (OS) and relative OS benefit of nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab were adjusted for potential bias introduced by treatment switching.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Treatment-switching adjustment analyses were conducted following the NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Document 16, for CheckMate 227 Part 1 OS data from treated patients (database lock, July 2, 2019). Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used in the base-case analysis; other methods were explored as sensitivity analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1166 randomized patients, 391 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 185 (PD-L1 &lt; 1%) patients received nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab; 387 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 183 (PD-L1 &lt; 1%) patients received chemotherapy, with 29.3-month minimum follow-up. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, 169/387 (43.7%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 66/183 (36.1%; PD-L1 &lt; 1%) switched to immunotherapy poststudy. Among treated patients, median OS was 17.4 months with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus 14.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.95) in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroup and 17.1 versus 12.4 months (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80) in the PD-L1 &lt; 1% subgroup. After treatment-switching adjustment using IPCW, the HR (95% CI) for OS for nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was reduced to 0.68 (0.56-0.83; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 0.53 (0.40-0.69; PD-L1 &lt; 1%). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Treatment-switching adjustments resulted in a greater estimated relative OS benefit with first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424001311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826) evaluated first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or < 1% and no EGFR/ALK alterations. However, many patients randomized to chemotherapy received subsequent immunotherapy. Here, overall survival (OS) and relative OS benefit of nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab were adjusted for potential bias introduced by treatment switching.

Materials and methods

Treatment-switching adjustment analyses were conducted following the NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Document 16, for CheckMate 227 Part 1 OS data from treated patients (database lock, July 2, 2019). Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used in the base-case analysis; other methods were explored as sensitivity analyses.

Results

Of 1166 randomized patients, 391 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 185 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab; 387 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 183 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received chemotherapy, with 29.3-month minimum follow-up. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, 169/387 (43.7%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 66/183 (36.1%; PD-L1 < 1%) switched to immunotherapy poststudy. Among treated patients, median OS was 17.4 months with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus 14.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.95) in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroup and 17.1 versus 12.4 months (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80) in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. After treatment-switching adjustment using IPCW, the HR (95% CI) for OS for nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was reduced to 0.68 (0.56-0.83; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 0.53 (0.40-0.69; PD-L1 < 1%). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the results.

Conclusion

Treatment-switching adjustments resulted in a greater estimated relative OS benefit with first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CheckMate 227 第一部分评估转移性非小细胞肺癌一线 Nivolumab 加 Ipilimumab 与化疗的总生存期治疗转换调整试验
CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826)评估了程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达≥1%或<1%且无/改变的转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的一线nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab与化疗的对比。然而,许多随机接受化疗的患者随后又接受了免疫疗法。在此,对nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab的总生存期(OS)和相对OS获益进行了调整,以消除治疗转换带来的潜在偏差。治疗转换调整分析是根据NICE决策支持部门技术支持文件16,针对CheckMate 227第1部分治疗患者的OS数据(数据库锁定时间为2019年7月2日)进行的。在基础案例分析中使用了逆概率删减加权法(IPCW);在敏感性分析中探讨了其他方法。在1166例随机患者中,391例(PD-L1≥1%)和185例(PD-L1<1%)患者接受了nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab治疗;387例(PD-L1≥1%)和183例(PD-L1<1%)患者接受了化疗,随访时间最短为29.3个月。化疗患者中,169/387(43.7%;PD-L1≥1%)和66/183(36.1%;PD-L1<1%)人在研究后转为免疫疗法。在接受治疗的患者中,PD-L1≥1%亚组中,nivolumab加伊匹单抗的中位OS为17.4个月,化疗为14.9个月(危险比[HR],0.80;95%置信区间[CI],0.68-0.95);PD-L1<1%亚组中,中位OS为17.1个月,化疗为12.4个月(HR,0.62;95% CI,0.49-0.80)。使用IPCW进行治疗转换调整后,nivolumab加伊匹单抗与化疗相比的OS HR(95%CI)分别降至0.68(0.56-0.83;PD-L1≥1%)和0.53(0.40-0.69;PD-L1<1%)。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。在转移性NSCLC患者中,治疗转换调整使一线nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab相对于化疗的估计相对OS获益更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1