Adverse events related to suction electrocautery devices in adenotonsillectomy: Analysis of the MAUDE database

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104404
Erin M. Gawel , Katelin R. Keenehan , Deepthi S. Akella , Michele M. Carr
{"title":"Adverse events related to suction electrocautery devices in adenotonsillectomy: Analysis of the MAUDE database","authors":"Erin M. Gawel ,&nbsp;Katelin R. Keenehan ,&nbsp;Deepthi S. Akella ,&nbsp;Michele M. Carr","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify adverse events (AEs) related to suction electrocautery use during adenotonsillectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was searched using the terms “suction cautery,” “suction electrocautery,” “suction Bovie,” and “suction coagulator” from January 2014 to December 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>165 AE reports were gathered from the MAUDE database medical device reports (MDRs). 36 met inclusion criteria. Patient injuries were found in 22 (61.1 %) reports and device malfunction events were found in 14 (38.9 %) reports. All patient injuries were thermal burns (<em>N</em> = 22, 100 %). Location of burn injuries included the lip (<em>N</em> = 6, 27.3 %), oral commissure (<em>N</em> = 5, 22.7 %), and tongue (<em>N</em> = 4, 18.2 %). The most common cause of an AE was inadequate device insulation (<em>N</em> = 7, 19.4 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The suction electrocautery apparatus may malfunction and cause patient burn injuries. Device failures mainly result from inadequate device insulation, coagulation problems, and detachment of device components. Surgeons must be aware of these potential complications and counsel parents and patients regarding AEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 5","pages":"Article 104404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400190X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify adverse events (AEs) related to suction electrocautery use during adenotonsillectomy.

Methods

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was searched using the terms “suction cautery,” “suction electrocautery,” “suction Bovie,” and “suction coagulator” from January 2014 to December 2023.

Results

165 AE reports were gathered from the MAUDE database medical device reports (MDRs). 36 met inclusion criteria. Patient injuries were found in 22 (61.1 %) reports and device malfunction events were found in 14 (38.9 %) reports. All patient injuries were thermal burns (N = 22, 100 %). Location of burn injuries included the lip (N = 6, 27.3 %), oral commissure (N = 5, 22.7 %), and tongue (N = 4, 18.2 %). The most common cause of an AE was inadequate device insulation (N = 7, 19.4 %).

Conclusion

The suction electrocautery apparatus may malfunction and cause patient burn injuries. Device failures mainly result from inadequate device insulation, coagulation problems, and detachment of device components. Surgeons must be aware of these potential complications and counsel parents and patients regarding AEs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腺扁桃体切除术中与抽吸电烧装置相关的不良事件:MAUDE 数据库分析。
目的确定在腺扁桃体切除术中使用抽吸电烧的相关不良事件(AEs):方法:使用 "抽吸烧灼术"、"抽吸电烧术"、"抽吸Bovie "和 "抽吸凝固器 "等术语搜索美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)制造商和用户设施设备经验(MAUDE)数据库,搜索时间为2014年1月至2023年12月:从 MAUDE 数据库医疗器械报告 (MDR) 中收集了 165 份 AE 报告。36份符合纳入标准。在 22 份(61.1%)报告中发现了患者伤害,在 14 份(38.9%)报告中发现了设备故障事件。所有患者损伤均为热烧伤(N = 22,100%)。烧伤部位包括嘴唇(6 例,占 27.3%)、口腔会阴(5 例,占 22.7%)和舌头(4 例,占 18.2%)。最常见的 AE 原因是设备绝缘不足(7 例,19.4%):结论:抽吸电烧装置可能会发生故障并导致患者烧伤。设备故障的主要原因是设备绝缘不足、凝固问题和设备部件脱落。外科医生必须意识到这些潜在的并发症,并就AEs向家长和患者提供咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
Unmet educational needs and expectations among tracheostomy recipients. Technique and outcomes of endoscopic supraglottic laryngectomy type IIIa using CO2 laser. An alternative to neuromodulation for refractory chronic idiopathic cough Neurogenic cough: A commentary on the step-up approach and therapeutic considerations A national survey of otolaryngologists' perspectives on uses and barriers to palliative care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1