A Comparison of 2 Exercise Protocols in Athletes With Primary Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-27 Print Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1123/jsr.2023-0332
Fatemeh Ehsani, Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Majid Mirmohammadkhani, Hanna Ehyaie
{"title":"A Comparison of 2 Exercise Protocols in Athletes With Primary Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Fatemeh Ehsani, Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Majid Mirmohammadkhani, Hanna Ehyaie","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2023-0332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>To stabilize the humeral head within the glenoid fossa during arm elevation, the rotator cuff muscles may contribute through internal and external rotation. The main purpose of the current study was to compare the acromiohumeral distance between athletes with primary subacromial impingement syndrome who received progressive resistance exercises consisting of either shoulder internal or external rotation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized and controlled clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty athletes with primary subacromial impingement syndrome were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 experimental groups. The progressive resistance exercise protocol in experimental group I comprised shoulder internal rotation, while in experimental group II consisted of shoulder external rotation. The experimental groups worked out 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The experimental groups were compared with the control group consisting of 15 healthy athletes. The acromiohumeral distance was measured before and after the intervention using an ultrasound machine under the passive and active across no arm elevation and 45°of arm elevation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The acromiohumeral distance significantly increased in both experimental groups under the passive and active arm positions following the intervention (P < .001), with no significant differences detected between the experimental groups (P > .665). The paired comparisons of the acromiohumeral distance discrepancy indicated a significant difference between the control group and each experimental group under the active and passive arm positions (P < .001), while no significant difference was observed between the experimental groups (P > .999).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study revealed, for the first time, that both progressive resistance exercise protocols involving either the shoulder internal or the external rotation increased the acromiohumeral distance in individuals with primary subacromial impingement syndrome and improved associated pain and disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"495-505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2023-0332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: To stabilize the humeral head within the glenoid fossa during arm elevation, the rotator cuff muscles may contribute through internal and external rotation. The main purpose of the current study was to compare the acromiohumeral distance between athletes with primary subacromial impingement syndrome who received progressive resistance exercises consisting of either shoulder internal or external rotation.

Design: A randomized and controlled clinical study.

Methods: Thirty athletes with primary subacromial impingement syndrome were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 experimental groups. The progressive resistance exercise protocol in experimental group I comprised shoulder internal rotation, while in experimental group II consisted of shoulder external rotation. The experimental groups worked out 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The experimental groups were compared with the control group consisting of 15 healthy athletes. The acromiohumeral distance was measured before and after the intervention using an ultrasound machine under the passive and active across no arm elevation and 45°of arm elevation.

Results: The acromiohumeral distance significantly increased in both experimental groups under the passive and active arm positions following the intervention (P < .001), with no significant differences detected between the experimental groups (P > .665). The paired comparisons of the acromiohumeral distance discrepancy indicated a significant difference between the control group and each experimental group under the active and passive arm positions (P < .001), while no significant difference was observed between the experimental groups (P > .999).

Conclusions: The present study revealed, for the first time, that both progressive resistance exercise protocols involving either the shoulder internal or the external rotation increased the acromiohumeral distance in individuals with primary subacromial impingement syndrome and improved associated pain and disabilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性肩峰下撞击综合征运动员的两种锻炼方案比较:随机临床试验。
背景:为了在手臂抬高时将肱骨头稳定在盂窝内,肩袖肌肉可通过内旋和外旋来发挥作用。本研究的主要目的是比较原发性肩峰下撞击综合征运动员在接受由肩关节内旋或外旋组成的渐进阻力训练后的肩峰距离:设计:随机对照临床研究:方法:30 名患有原发性肩峰下撞击综合征的运动员被随机分为 2 个实验组。实验组 I 的渐进阻力训练方案包括肩关节内旋,而实验组 II 则包括肩关节外旋。实验组每周锻炼 3 天,持续 6 周。实验组与由 15 名健康运动员组成的对照组进行了比较。在干预前后,使用超声波仪测量了在手臂不抬高和抬高45°的被动和主动情况下的肱骨肩峰距离:结果:干预后,两个实验组在被动和主动手臂位置下的肱骨肩峰距离都明显增加(P < .001),实验组之间未发现明显差异(P > .665)。肱骨肩峰距离差异的配对比较显示,对照组与各实验组在主动和被动手臂姿势下存在显著差异(P < .001),而实验组之间未发现显著差异(P > .999):本研究首次揭示了两种涉及肩关节内旋或外旋的渐进阻力锻炼方案都能增加原发性肩峰下撞击综合征患者的肩峰肱骨距离,并改善相关疼痛和残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
期刊最新文献
Minimizing Running Load via Gentle Heel Strike Techniques: A Gait Modification Study. Treatment Order and Retention of Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion. Comparing Nerve Versus Muscle Wide-Pulse High-Frequency Electrical Stimulation for Maximal and Submaximal Efforts. Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Individuals With Lateral Elbow Pain: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial. Persian Version of the Modified Constant Score in Overhead Athletes: A Reliability and Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1