Predictors of treatment outcomes. Patients with persistent physical symptoms in primary care.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0004
Cathrine Abrahamsen, Knut Reidar Wangen, Morten Lindbaek, Erik Lønnmark Werner
{"title":"Predictors of treatment outcomes. Patients with persistent physical symptoms in primary care.","authors":"Cathrine Abrahamsen, Knut Reidar Wangen, Morten Lindbaek, Erik Lønnmark Werner","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent physical symptoms (PSS) are consistently prevalent among primary care patients. PSS can negatively affect quality of life, healthcare costs, and work participation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine predictors of treatment outcome in patients with who received treatment by a work-focused communication tool known as the Individual Challenge Inventory Tool (ICIT) delivered by the patient's general practitioner. In a previous study we found substantially improved outcomes and reduced sick leave for patients treated by the work-focused communication tool ICIT compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>This study is based on the findings of our previous cluster randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Regression analyses of the intervention group were used to identify predictors (all measured at baseline) of improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and sick leave after 11 weeks follow up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Living alone predicted improvement in the adjusted model (OR =4·03, 95% CI: 1·33-12·25, <i>P</i>=0·014). Receiving long term benefits predicted improved PGIC in both the unadjusted (OR =2·30, 95% CI: 1·21-4·39, <i>P</i>=0·011) and adjusted models (OR =2·46, 95% CI: 1·04-5·83, <i>P</i>=0·040). In addition, living alone predicted reduced sick leave in the adjusted model (OR =3·23, 95% CI: 1·11-9·42, <i>P</i>=0·032.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, there were few factors to predict the outcome of the work-focused communication tool ICIT. We therefore suggest that this work-focused communication tool ICIT is applicable to most patients with PPS. GPs may consider using the ICIT for all primary care patients who exhibit ineffective coping strategies in their daily lives and work, especially those who live alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persistent physical symptoms (PSS) are consistently prevalent among primary care patients. PSS can negatively affect quality of life, healthcare costs, and work participation.

Aim: To examine predictors of treatment outcome in patients with who received treatment by a work-focused communication tool known as the Individual Challenge Inventory Tool (ICIT) delivered by the patient's general practitioner. In a previous study we found substantially improved outcomes and reduced sick leave for patients treated by the work-focused communication tool ICIT compared to a control group.

Design & setting: This study is based on the findings of our previous cluster randomised controlled trial.

Method: Regression analyses of the intervention group were used to identify predictors (all measured at baseline) of improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and sick leave after 11 weeks follow up.

Results: Living alone predicted improvement in the adjusted model (OR =4·03, 95% CI: 1·33-12·25, P=0·014). Receiving long term benefits predicted improved PGIC in both the unadjusted (OR =2·30, 95% CI: 1·21-4·39, P=0·011) and adjusted models (OR =2·46, 95% CI: 1·04-5·83, P=0·040). In addition, living alone predicted reduced sick leave in the adjusted model (OR =3·23, 95% CI: 1·11-9·42, P=0·032.

Conclusion: In general, there were few factors to predict the outcome of the work-focused communication tool ICIT. We therefore suggest that this work-focused communication tool ICIT is applicable to most patients with PPS. GPs may consider using the ICIT for all primary care patients who exhibit ineffective coping strategies in their daily lives and work, especially those who live alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗结果的预测因素。初级保健中的持续性躯体症状患者。
背景:持续性躯体症状(PSS)在初级保健患者中一直很普遍。目的:研究由患者的全科医生提供的个人挑战量表工具(ICIT)对接受以工作为重点的沟通工具治疗的患者的治疗结果的预测因素。在之前的一项研究中,我们发现与对照组相比,接受以工作为重点的沟通工具 "个人挑战量表工具(ICIT)"治疗的患者的疗效显著提高,病假减少:本研究以我们之前的分组随机对照试验结果为基础:方法:对干预组进行回归分析,以确定11周随访后患者总体变化印象(PGIC)和病假改善的预测因素(均在基线时测量):结果:在调整后的模型中,独居可预测病情的改善(OR =4-03,95% CI:1-33-12-25,P=0-014)。在未调整模型(OR =2-30,95% CI:1-21-4-39,P=0-011)和调整模型(OR =2-46,95% CI:1-04-5-83,P=0-040)中,接受长期福利可预测 PGIC 的改善。此外,在调整模型中,独居预测病假减少(OR =3-23,95% CI:1-11-9-42,P=0-032):总的来说,很少有因素可以预测以工作为重点的沟通工具 ICIT 的结果。因此,我们认为工作沟通工具 ICIT 适用于大多数 PPS 患者。全科医生可以考虑对所有在日常生活和工作中表现出无效应对策略的初级保健患者,尤其是独居患者,使用该工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Primary care performance in a Ugandan rural district: cross-sectional descriptive study. Mental healthcare and pragmatic shared decision-making in general practice: An interview study. Treating the perimenopause in the UK armed forces: a mixed methods review exploring the confidence of general practitioners. Translating primary care to telehealth: analysis of in-person paediatric consultations and role of the carers. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1