Comparative evaluation of the compressive strength of treated drill cutting blocks and sandcrete blocks

S. E. Ezeani
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the compressive strength of treated drill cutting blocks and sandcrete blocks","authors":"S. E. Ezeani","doi":"10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management of drill cuttings is a major environmental concern in the oil drilling operations. This study evaluates the compressive strength of treated drill cuttings block when compared with the sandcrete block for use in the construction industry. 100mmx 100mm sandcrete and cutting block were moulded using Portland cement as a binding agent in the mix ratio of 1; 6. The blocks were cured for 7 and 14 days. The compressive strength of both the cutting and sandcrete block were tested after 7 and 14 days. The study found the cuttings block exhibited significantly higher load-bearing capacity compared to the sandcrete blocks. The failure loads for cuttings blocks were approximately double those of the sandcrete blocks. Specifically, after 7 days of curing, cuttings blocks A1 and A2 withstood loads of 20 KN and 21 KN, respectively, whereas sandcrete blocks A1 and A2 only withstood 10 KN and 11 KN, respectively. Similarly, compressive strength of 3.1 N/mm², 3.2 N/mm² and 2.0 N/mm, 2.1 N/mm was achieved by cuttings blocks and sandcrete blocks respectively after 14 days of curing. The findings of this study suggest that cuttings blocks are a robust alternative to traditional Sandcrete blocks, particularly for construction applications where higher strength is desired. The increased compressive strength and weight gain over time, along with the blocks' ability to meet and exceed the minimum strength requirements, highlight their suitability for various building construction needs.","PeriodicalId":14366,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Research Archive","volume":"3 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Research Archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of drill cuttings is a major environmental concern in the oil drilling operations. This study evaluates the compressive strength of treated drill cuttings block when compared with the sandcrete block for use in the construction industry. 100mmx 100mm sandcrete and cutting block were moulded using Portland cement as a binding agent in the mix ratio of 1; 6. The blocks were cured for 7 and 14 days. The compressive strength of both the cutting and sandcrete block were tested after 7 and 14 days. The study found the cuttings block exhibited significantly higher load-bearing capacity compared to the sandcrete blocks. The failure loads for cuttings blocks were approximately double those of the sandcrete blocks. Specifically, after 7 days of curing, cuttings blocks A1 and A2 withstood loads of 20 KN and 21 KN, respectively, whereas sandcrete blocks A1 and A2 only withstood 10 KN and 11 KN, respectively. Similarly, compressive strength of 3.1 N/mm², 3.2 N/mm² and 2.0 N/mm, 2.1 N/mm was achieved by cuttings blocks and sandcrete blocks respectively after 14 days of curing. The findings of this study suggest that cuttings blocks are a robust alternative to traditional Sandcrete blocks, particularly for construction applications where higher strength is desired. The increased compressive strength and weight gain over time, along with the blocks' ability to meet and exceed the minimum strength requirements, highlight their suitability for various building construction needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经处理的钻凿块和砂混凝土块的抗压强度比较评估
钻屑管理是石油钻探作业中的一个主要环境问题。本研究评估了经过处理的钻屑砌块与建筑行业使用的砂混凝土砌块的抗压强度。使用波特兰水泥作为粘结剂,以 1:6 的混合比例模压出 100 毫米 x 100 毫米的砂混凝土砌块和切削砌块。7 天和 14 天后测试切块和砂混凝土块的抗压强度。研究发现,与砂混凝土砌块相比,切割砌块的承载能力明显更高。切块的破坏荷载大约是砂混凝土块的两倍。具体来说,固化 7 天后,扦插块 A1 和 A2 分别能承受 20 千牛和 21 千牛的荷载,而砂混凝土扦插块 A1 和 A2 分别只能承受 10 千牛和 11 千牛的荷载。同样,扦插砌块和砂混凝土砌块在固化 14 天后的抗压强度分别达到 3.1 牛顿/平方毫米和 3.2 牛顿/平方毫米,以及 2.0 牛顿/平方毫米和 2.1 牛顿/平方毫米。这项研究结果表明,扦插砌块是传统砂混凝土砌块的有力替代品,尤其适用于需要较高强度的建筑应用。随着时间的推移,抗压强度和重量的增加,以及砌块达到和超过最低强度要求的能力,都凸显了它们对各种建筑施工需求的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Isolation and biochemical screening of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria from Kans grass rhizosphere of Fly Ash Dump Sites near NTPC, Angul The impact of personality disorders in parents on children's social skills, peer relationships, and emotional development: A systematic review and meta-analysis Validation of the crib ii score for predicting very low birth weight infants’ mortality Optimizing antenna performance: A review of multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) antenna design techniques The influence of school principal leadership, teachers’ creativity and motivation on teachers’ performance in vocational high schools in Bangka Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1