Modelling Up-and-Down Moves of Binomial Option Pricing with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers

Axioms Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.3390/axioms13080503
J. D. Andrés-Sánchez
{"title":"Modelling Up-and-Down Moves of Binomial Option Pricing with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers","authors":"J. D. Andrés-Sánchez","doi":"10.3390/axioms13080503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the early 21st century, within fuzzy mathematics, there has been a stream of research in the field of option pricing that introduces vagueness in the parameters governing the movement of the underlying asset price through fuzzy numbers (FNs). This approach is commonly known as fuzzy random option pricing (FROP). In discrete time, most contributions use the binomial groundwork with up-and-down moves proposed by Cox, Ross, and Rubinstein (CRR), which introduces epistemic uncertainty associated with volatility through FNs. Thus, the present work falls within this stream of literature and contributes to the literature in three ways. First, analytical developments allow for the introduction of uncertainty with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs), which are a generalization of FNs. Therefore, we can introduce bipolar uncertainty in parameter modelling. Second, a methodology is proposed that allows for adjusting the volatility with which the option is valued through an IFN. This approach is based on the existing developments in the literature on adjusting statistical parameters with possibility distributions via historical data. Third, we introduce into the debate on fuzzy random binomial option pricing the analytical framework that should be used in modelling upwards and downwards moves. In this sense, binomial modelling is usually employed to value path-dependent options that cannot be directly evaluated with the Black–Scholes–Merton (BSM) model. Thus, one way to assess the suitability of binomial moves for valuing a particular option is to approximate the results of the BSM in a European option with the same characteristics as the option of interest. In this study, we compared the moves proposed by Renddleman and Bartter (RB) with CRR. We have observed that, depending on the moneyness degree of the option and, without a doubt, on options traded at the money, RB modelling offers greater convergence to BSM prices than does CRR modelling.","PeriodicalId":502355,"journal":{"name":"Axioms","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Axioms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the early 21st century, within fuzzy mathematics, there has been a stream of research in the field of option pricing that introduces vagueness in the parameters governing the movement of the underlying asset price through fuzzy numbers (FNs). This approach is commonly known as fuzzy random option pricing (FROP). In discrete time, most contributions use the binomial groundwork with up-and-down moves proposed by Cox, Ross, and Rubinstein (CRR), which introduces epistemic uncertainty associated with volatility through FNs. Thus, the present work falls within this stream of literature and contributes to the literature in three ways. First, analytical developments allow for the introduction of uncertainty with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs), which are a generalization of FNs. Therefore, we can introduce bipolar uncertainty in parameter modelling. Second, a methodology is proposed that allows for adjusting the volatility with which the option is valued through an IFN. This approach is based on the existing developments in the literature on adjusting statistical parameters with possibility distributions via historical data. Third, we introduce into the debate on fuzzy random binomial option pricing the analytical framework that should be used in modelling upwards and downwards moves. In this sense, binomial modelling is usually employed to value path-dependent options that cannot be directly evaluated with the Black–Scholes–Merton (BSM) model. Thus, one way to assess the suitability of binomial moves for valuing a particular option is to approximate the results of the BSM in a European option with the same characteristics as the option of interest. In this study, we compared the moves proposed by Renddleman and Bartter (RB) with CRR. We have observed that, depending on the moneyness degree of the option and, without a doubt, on options traded at the money, RB modelling offers greater convergence to BSM prices than does CRR modelling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用直觉模糊数模拟二项式期权定价的上下波动
自 21 世纪初以来,在模糊数学中,期权定价领域出现了一种通过模糊数(FNs)在支配标的资产价格变动的参数中引入模糊性的研究方法。这种方法通常被称为模糊随机期权定价(FROP)。在离散时间中,大多数研究都采用考克斯、罗斯和鲁宾斯坦(Cox, Ross, and Rubinstein, CRR)提出的具有上下波动的二叉基础,通过 FNs 引入了与波动相关的认识不确定性。因此,本研究属于这一文献流,并在三个方面对这一文献有所贡献。首先,分析的发展允许通过直觉模糊数(IFNs)引入不确定性,而直觉模糊数是 FNs 的一般化。因此,我们可以在参数建模中引入两极不确定性。其次,我们提出了一种方法,可以通过 IFN 来调整期权估值的波动率。这种方法基于现有文献中通过历史数据调整统计参数可能性分布的发展。第三,我们在关于模糊随机二叉期权定价的讨论中引入了模拟向上和向下移动时应使用 的分析框架。从这个意义上说,二叉模型通常被用于对路径依赖期权进行估值,而这些期权无法直接用布莱克-斯科尔斯-默顿(BSM)模型进行评估。因此,评估二叉移动对某一特定期权估值的适用性的一种方法是在具有与相关期权相同特 征的欧式期权中对 BSM 的结果进行近似。在本研究中,我们将 Renddleman 和 Bartter(RB)提出的移动方法与 CRR 进行了比较。我们发现,根据期权的货币性程度,毫无疑问,对于在货币价位交易的期权,RB 模型比 CRR 模型更接近于 BSM 价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geometry of Torsion Gerbes and Flat Twisted Vector Bundles The Unified Description of Abstract Convexity Structures Modelling Up-and-Down Moves of Binomial Option Pricing with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers The Impact of Quasi-Conformal Curvature Tensor on Warped Product Manifolds On Lebesgue Constants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1