Comparison of Eye Axial Length Measurements Taken Using Partial Coherence Interferometry and OCT Biometry

Vision Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.3390/vision8030046
Nicola Rizzieri, Alessio Facchin
{"title":"Comparison of Eye Axial Length Measurements Taken Using Partial Coherence Interferometry and OCT Biometry","authors":"Nicola Rizzieri, Alessio Facchin","doi":"10.3390/vision8030046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the inter-device measurement properties of partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in measuring axial length, particularly for myopia management. We recruited 82 eyes from 41 adult participants with a mean age of 31.0 ± 17.6 years and a mean spherical equivalent of −2.20 ± 2.28 D. Axial length was measured using SD-OCT and PCI for both the right and left eyes. Agreement between the two measurements was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis, and graphs and values were compared with linear mixed models. The results show a near-to-zero and non-significant bias between measurements. The 95% limits of agreement showed a value of 0.06 mm. Both devices can accurately measure the axial length. OCT biometry performed with SD-OCT can be successfully interchanged with partial coherence interferometry, but they should be cautiously interchanged when performing longitudinal comparisons.","PeriodicalId":23649,"journal":{"name":"Vision","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8030046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the inter-device measurement properties of partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in measuring axial length, particularly for myopia management. We recruited 82 eyes from 41 adult participants with a mean age of 31.0 ± 17.6 years and a mean spherical equivalent of −2.20 ± 2.28 D. Axial length was measured using SD-OCT and PCI for both the right and left eyes. Agreement between the two measurements was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis, and graphs and values were compared with linear mixed models. The results show a near-to-zero and non-significant bias between measurements. The 95% limits of agreement showed a value of 0.06 mm. Both devices can accurately measure the axial length. OCT biometry performed with SD-OCT can be successfully interchanged with partial coherence interferometry, but they should be cautiously interchanged when performing longitudinal comparisons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用部分相干干涉测量法和 OCT 生物测量法测量眼轴长度的比较
本研究评估了部分相干干涉仪(PCI)和光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)在测量轴长,尤其是近视管理方面的设备间测量特性。我们从 41 名成年参与者中招募了 82 只眼睛,他们的平均年龄为 31.0 ± 17.6 岁,平均球面等效度数为 -2.20 ± 2.28 D。使用 SD-OCT 和 PCI 测量了左右眼的轴长。使用 Bland-Altman 分析评估了两种测量方法之间的一致性,并使用线性混合模型对图形和数值进行了比较。结果显示,测量值之间的偏差接近零且不显著。95% 的一致性限值为 0.06 毫米。两种设备都能准确测量轴向长度。使用 SD-OCT 进行的 OCT 生物测量可以成功地与部分相干干涉测量进行互换,但在进行纵向比较时应谨慎互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Eye Axial Length Measurements Taken Using Partial Coherence Interferometry and OCT Biometry The Effect of the Zonular Fiber Angle of Insertion on Accommodation Perceptual Biases in the Interpretation of Non-Rigid Shape Transformations from Motion A New Model of a Macular Buckle and a Refined Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Myopic Traction Maculopathy Eyes on Memory: Pupillometry in Encoding and Retrieval
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1