Could different cut-off values be used for 50-gram glucose tolerance test in low and high risk groups?

Burcu Dinçgez, Gülten Özgen, Levent Özgen
{"title":"Could different cut-off values be used for 50-gram glucose tolerance test in low and high risk groups?","authors":"Burcu Dinçgez, Gülten Özgen, Levent Özgen","doi":"10.18621/eurj.1505012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: There are controversies about screening strategy and cut-off levels for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Here, we aimed to identify optimal cut-off values for 50-gram oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) in high and low risk pregnant women. \nMethods: A total of 500 patients who underwent two step OGTT were divided into two groups as GDM (n=31) and controls (n=469). Moreover, patients were grouped as high (n=114) and low risk (n=386) for GDM. Having≥2 risk factors such as family history of type-2 diabetes, obesity, glucosuria, previous history of GDM, macrosomia and diabetic complications were accepted as high risk. Demographic data, OGTT results, birth characteristics were recorded and compared between groups. A cut-off value for 50-gram OGTT was evaluated in low and high risk groups. \nResults: The 50-gram OGTT value above 140 mg/dL discriminated GDM with 100% sensitivity and 92.11% specificity in all patients (AUC=0.969, P<0.001). The prevalence of GDM was 19.3% in high and 2.3% in low risk group. The 50-gram OGTT value above 140 mg/dL discriminated GDM with 100% sensitivity and 94.57% specificity in high risk patients (AUC=0.992, P<0.001). Furthermore, 50-gram OGTT value above 149 mg/dL discriminated GDM with 100% sensitivity and 93.63% specificity in low risk patients (AUC=0.976, P<0.001). \nConclusions: Although screening in low risk population is a debating issue worldwide, our local guidelines still recommend screening all pregnant women. We suggest that performing 100-gram OGTT only in patients who have higher values than 149 mg/dL in 50-gram OGTT can be an alternative screening strategy in low risk group.","PeriodicalId":509363,"journal":{"name":"The European Research Journal","volume":"50 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1505012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There are controversies about screening strategy and cut-off levels for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Here, we aimed to identify optimal cut-off values for 50-gram oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) in high and low risk pregnant women. Methods: A total of 500 patients who underwent two step OGTT were divided into two groups as GDM (n=31) and controls (n=469). Moreover, patients were grouped as high (n=114) and low risk (n=386) for GDM. Having≥2 risk factors such as family history of type-2 diabetes, obesity, glucosuria, previous history of GDM, macrosomia and diabetic complications were accepted as high risk. Demographic data, OGTT results, birth characteristics were recorded and compared between groups. A cut-off value for 50-gram OGTT was evaluated in low and high risk groups. Results: The 50-gram OGTT value above 140 mg/dL discriminated GDM with 100% sensitivity and 92.11% specificity in all patients (AUC=0.969, P<0.001). The prevalence of GDM was 19.3% in high and 2.3% in low risk group. The 50-gram OGTT value above 140 mg/dL discriminated GDM with 100% sensitivity and 94.57% specificity in high risk patients (AUC=0.992, P<0.001). Furthermore, 50-gram OGTT value above 149 mg/dL discriminated GDM with 100% sensitivity and 93.63% specificity in low risk patients (AUC=0.976, P<0.001). Conclusions: Although screening in low risk population is a debating issue worldwide, our local guidelines still recommend screening all pregnant women. We suggest that performing 100-gram OGTT only in patients who have higher values than 149 mg/dL in 50-gram OGTT can be an alternative screening strategy in low risk group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
50 克葡萄糖耐量试验在低风险和高风险人群中是否可以使用不同的临界值?
目的:关于妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的筛查策略和临界值存在争议。在此,我们旨在为高风险和低风险孕妇确定 50 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的最佳临界值。研究方法将接受两步 OGTT 的 500 名患者分为两组,即 GDM 组(31 人)和对照组(469 人)。此外,患者还被分为 GDM 高危(114 人)和低危(386 人)两组。具有 2 型糖尿病家族史、肥胖、糖尿、GDM 既往史、巨大儿和糖尿病并发症等≥2 个危险因素的患者被视为高危人群。记录人口统计学数据、OGTT 结果和出生特征,并进行组间比较。对低风险组和高风险组的 50 克 OGTT 临界值进行了评估。结果:在所有患者中,50 克 OGTT 值高于 140 毫克/分升可判定为 GDM,灵敏度为 100%,特异度为 92.11%(AUC=0.969,P<0.001)。高风险组和低风险组的 GDM 患病率分别为 19.3% 和 2.3%。在高危患者中,50 克 OGTT 值高于 140 毫克/分升可判定为 GDM,灵敏度为 100%,特异度为 94.57%(AUC=0.992,P<0.001)。此外,50 克 OGTT 值高于 149 毫克/分升时,低危患者鉴别 GDM 的灵敏度为 100%,特异度为 93.63%(AUC=0.976,P<0.001)。结论尽管对低危人群进行筛查在全世界都是一个有争议的问题,但我们当地的指南仍建议对所有孕妇进行筛查。我们建议,仅对 50 克 OGTT 值高于 149 毫克/分升的患者进行 100 克 OGTT,可作为低风险人群的另一种筛查策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A different training model in providing effective medical waste management in the operating room: peer education Effect of oxidative stress on cognitive functions in children with obesity Therapeutic approaches to language skills in major neurodegenerative disorders: a literature review Does the presence of persistant metopic suture affect the use of frontal sinus and frontal morphometric measurements in gender identification? Could different cut-off values be used for 50-gram glucose tolerance test in low and high risk groups?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1