Nonbinary Voices for Digital Assistants—An Investigation of User Perceptions and Gender Stereotypes

Robotics Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.3390/robotics13080111
Sonja Theresa Längle, Stephan Schlögl, Annina Ecker, Willemijn S. M. T. van Kooten, Teresa Spiess
{"title":"Nonbinary Voices for Digital Assistants—An Investigation of User Perceptions and Gender Stereotypes","authors":"Sonja Theresa Längle, Stephan Schlögl, Annina Ecker, Willemijn S. M. T. van Kooten, Teresa Spiess","doi":"10.3390/robotics13080111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the wide adoption of digital voice assistants (DVAs), interactions with technology have also changed our perceptions, highlighting and reinforcing (mostly) negative gender stereotypes. Regarding the ongoing advancements in the field of human–machine interaction, a developed and improved understanding of and awareness of the reciprocity of gender and DVA technology use is thus crucial. Our work in this field expands prior research by including a nonbinary voice option as a means to eschew gender stereotypes. We used a between-subject quasi-experimental questionnaire study (female voice vs. male voice vs. nonbinary voice), in which n=318 participants provided feedback on gender stereotypes connected to voice perceptions and personality traits. Our findings show that the overall gender perception of our nonbinary voice leaned towards male on the gender spectrum, whereas the female-gendered and male-gendered voices were clearly identified as such. Furthermore, we found that feminine attributes were clearly tied to our female-gendered voice, whereas the connection of masculine attributes to the male voice was less pronounced. Most notably, however, we did not find gender-stereotypical trait attributions with our nonbinary voice. Results also show that the likability of our female-gendered and nonbinary voices was lower than it was with our male-gendered voice, and that, particularly with the nonbinary voice, this likability was affected by people’s personality traits. Thus, overall, our findings contribute (1) additional theoretical grounding for gender-studies in human–machine interaction, and (2) insights concerning peoples’ perceptions of nonbinary voices, providing additional guidance for researchers, technology designers, and DVA providers.","PeriodicalId":506759,"journal":{"name":"Robotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13080111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the wide adoption of digital voice assistants (DVAs), interactions with technology have also changed our perceptions, highlighting and reinforcing (mostly) negative gender stereotypes. Regarding the ongoing advancements in the field of human–machine interaction, a developed and improved understanding of and awareness of the reciprocity of gender and DVA technology use is thus crucial. Our work in this field expands prior research by including a nonbinary voice option as a means to eschew gender stereotypes. We used a between-subject quasi-experimental questionnaire study (female voice vs. male voice vs. nonbinary voice), in which n=318 participants provided feedback on gender stereotypes connected to voice perceptions and personality traits. Our findings show that the overall gender perception of our nonbinary voice leaned towards male on the gender spectrum, whereas the female-gendered and male-gendered voices were clearly identified as such. Furthermore, we found that feminine attributes were clearly tied to our female-gendered voice, whereas the connection of masculine attributes to the male voice was less pronounced. Most notably, however, we did not find gender-stereotypical trait attributions with our nonbinary voice. Results also show that the likability of our female-gendered and nonbinary voices was lower than it was with our male-gendered voice, and that, particularly with the nonbinary voice, this likability was affected by people’s personality traits. Thus, overall, our findings contribute (1) additional theoretical grounding for gender-studies in human–machine interaction, and (2) insights concerning peoples’ perceptions of nonbinary voices, providing additional guidance for researchers, technology designers, and DVA providers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字助理的非二元声音--用户认知和性别成见调查
由于数字语音助手(DVA)的广泛应用,与技术的互动也改变了我们的观念,凸显并强化了(大部分)负面的性别刻板印象。随着人机交互领域的不断进步,对性别和数字语音助理技术使用的互惠性的理解和认识的发展和提高至关重要。我们在这一领域的工作扩展了之前的研究,加入了非二元语音选项,以此来摒弃性别刻板印象。我们使用了一项主体间准实验问卷研究(女声 vs. 男声 vs. 非二元语音),共有 318 名参与者提供了与语音感知和个性特征相关的性别刻板印象反馈。我们的研究结果表明,非二元声音的整体性别认知偏向于性别光谱中的男性,而女性性别和男性性别的声音则被明确识别为男性声音。此外,我们还发现,女性特质与我们的女性性别声音有着明显的联系,而男性特质与男性声音的联系则不那么明显。然而,最值得注意的是,我们没有发现我们的非二元声音具有性别陈规定型特征。研究结果还显示,女性性别声音和非二元声音的好感度低于男性性别声音,尤其是非二元声音,这种好感度受到人们人格特质的影响。因此,总的来说,我们的研究结果有助于:(1)为人机交互中的性别研究提供更多理论依据;(2)深入了解人们对非二元声音的看法,为研究人员、技术设计人员和 DVA 提供者提供更多指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning to Walk with Adaptive Feet Nonbinary Voices for Digital Assistants—An Investigation of User Perceptions and Gender Stereotypes The Future of Intelligent Healthcare: A Systematic Analysis and Discussion on the Integration and Impact of Robots Using Large Language Models for Healthcare A Reconfigurable UGV for Modular and Flexible Inspection Tasks in Nuclear Sites Large-Scale Urban Traffic Management Using Zero-Shot Knowledge Transfer in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Intersection Patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1