How to combine ML and MCDM techniques: an extended bibliometric analysis

Mehmet Asaf Düzen, İsmail Buğra Bölükbaşı, E. Calik
{"title":"How to combine ML and MCDM techniques: an extended bibliometric analysis","authors":"Mehmet Asaf Düzen, İsmail Buğra Bölükbaşı, E. Calik","doi":"10.61112/jiens.1475948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine Learning (ML) and Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) are popular methods that have recently been widely used in many different fields. Due to the increasing use of these two methods together, there is a need for a bibliometric analysis in this area. In this study, an extended author-developed bibliometric analysis was performed on 1189 publications retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases between January 2000 and April 2024. In the initial bibliometric analysis, as a generic part, the VOSviewer program was used to make the data meaningful. In particular, the analysis was carried out according to years and relationships related to the keyword analysis. In addition, the most frequently used keywords were identified, and the direction of the trend was determined. During the initial bibliometric analysis, 308 publications were analyzed, with 297 publications retrieved from the WoS database and 11 publications from Scopus. The study distinguishes itself from the existing literature by establishing new models and categories as an extended part of bibliometric analysis. Using these models and categories, we sought to answer questions about how researchers use ML and MCDM together and in what direction these methods are evolving. In this context, the distribution of models and categories in different research areas and their changes over the years were analyzed. This study provides researchers with a comprehensive perspective on the various combination possibilities when integrating ML and MCDM techniques.","PeriodicalId":306664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1475948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) and Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) are popular methods that have recently been widely used in many different fields. Due to the increasing use of these two methods together, there is a need for a bibliometric analysis in this area. In this study, an extended author-developed bibliometric analysis was performed on 1189 publications retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases between January 2000 and April 2024. In the initial bibliometric analysis, as a generic part, the VOSviewer program was used to make the data meaningful. In particular, the analysis was carried out according to years and relationships related to the keyword analysis. In addition, the most frequently used keywords were identified, and the direction of the trend was determined. During the initial bibliometric analysis, 308 publications were analyzed, with 297 publications retrieved from the WoS database and 11 publications from Scopus. The study distinguishes itself from the existing literature by establishing new models and categories as an extended part of bibliometric analysis. Using these models and categories, we sought to answer questions about how researchers use ML and MCDM together and in what direction these methods are evolving. In this context, the distribution of models and categories in different research areas and their changes over the years were analyzed. This study provides researchers with a comprehensive perspective on the various combination possibilities when integrating ML and MCDM techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何将 ML 和 MCDM 技术相结合:扩展文献计量学分析
机器学习(ML)和多标准决策(MCDM)是最近在许多不同领域得到广泛应用的流行方法。由于这两种方法的使用越来越多,因此有必要对这一领域进行文献计量分析。本研究对 2000 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月期间从 Web of Science (WoS) 和 Scopus 数据库中检索到的 1189 篇出版物进行了由作者开发的扩展文献计量分析。在最初的文献计量分析中,作为一个通用部分,使用了 VOSviewer 程序使数据更有意义。特别是,分析是根据年份和与关键词分析相关的关系进行的。此外,还确定了最常使用的关键词,并确定了趋势的方向。在最初的文献计量分析中,共分析了 308 篇出版物,其中 297 篇从 WoS 数据库中检索,11 篇从 Scopus 中检索。这项研究有别于现有文献,它建立了新的模型和类别,作为文献计量分析的扩展部分。利用这些模型和类别,我们试图回答研究人员如何同时使用 ML 和 MCDM 以及这些方法的发展方向等问题。在此背景下,我们分析了模型和类别在不同研究领域中的分布情况及其多年来的变化。这项研究为研究人员提供了一个全面的视角,让他们了解在整合 ML 和 MCDM 技术时的各种组合可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trafik olaylarının çevresel etkileri: İstanbul O2 (TEM) otoyolu örneği How to combine ML and MCDM techniques: an extended bibliometric analysis Tiyol-epoksi click reaksiyonu ile hazırlanan haloysit/termoset nanokompozitlerinin mekanik karakterizasyonu Design of a two-pole electromagnet and its analysis under different load conditions Effect of heat treatment conditions on the phase transformation characteristics of nitinol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1