A Comparative Study of Mental Health, Body Composition, and Physical Activity in American vs Romanian College Students After COVID-19 Lockdown

Manuela C Caciula, Luis Torres, Simion Tomoioaga
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Mental Health, Body Composition, and Physical Activity in American vs Romanian College Students After COVID-19 Lockdown","authors":"Manuela C Caciula, Luis Torres, Simion Tomoioaga","doi":"10.53520/jen2024.103171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic and its lockdown restrictions forced college students to spend less time on campuses and more time indoors at home, increasing their sedentary behaviors. We aimed to better understand trends among assumed decreased physical activity levels, increased mental health symptoms, and increased poor nutritional habits. The results will serve healthcare clinicians in developing targeted interventions for improving overall health in college students.\nMethods: American college students (n = 90) and Romanian college students (n = 85) were assessed for current self-reported levels of physical activity, mental health symptoms, and body composition values in the post-COVID-19 lockdown era.\nResults: All participants (N =185; 100 females) reported being highly active (82.3%) and experiencing a current level of heightened depressive and anxious symptomatology (58.2%). Differences were seen between the measured body fat percentages (BF) and skeletal muscle masses (SKMM) of the American (BF: males 26.66 12.24%, females 32.88  10.13%) and Romanian (BF: males 11.76  6.68%, females 18.07  9.30%) college students. Despite these differences, all participants collectively displayed a positive relationship between depressive and anxious symptomatology and BF (R = 0.23; p = 0.0018) and a negative relationship between depressive and anxious symptomatology and SKMM  (R = - 0.15; p = 0.04).\nConclusions: Although cultural differences may help to explain the found differences among body fat percentages and skeletal muscle masses, both groups of college students did similarly struggle with symptoms of depression and anxiety. The post-lockdown coping mechanisms embraced by both groups of college students have not been fully effective in improving their mental health.\n ","PeriodicalId":508165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise and Nutrition","volume":"15 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53520/jen2024.103171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic and its lockdown restrictions forced college students to spend less time on campuses and more time indoors at home, increasing their sedentary behaviors. We aimed to better understand trends among assumed decreased physical activity levels, increased mental health symptoms, and increased poor nutritional habits. The results will serve healthcare clinicians in developing targeted interventions for improving overall health in college students. Methods: American college students (n = 90) and Romanian college students (n = 85) were assessed for current self-reported levels of physical activity, mental health symptoms, and body composition values in the post-COVID-19 lockdown era. Results: All participants (N =185; 100 females) reported being highly active (82.3%) and experiencing a current level of heightened depressive and anxious symptomatology (58.2%). Differences were seen between the measured body fat percentages (BF) and skeletal muscle masses (SKMM) of the American (BF: males 26.66 12.24%, females 32.88  10.13%) and Romanian (BF: males 11.76  6.68%, females 18.07  9.30%) college students. Despite these differences, all participants collectively displayed a positive relationship between depressive and anxious symptomatology and BF (R = 0.23; p = 0.0018) and a negative relationship between depressive and anxious symptomatology and SKMM  (R = - 0.15; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Although cultural differences may help to explain the found differences among body fat percentages and skeletal muscle masses, both groups of college students did similarly struggle with symptoms of depression and anxiety. The post-lockdown coping mechanisms embraced by both groups of college students have not been fully effective in improving their mental health.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 封锁后美国与罗马尼亚大学生心理健康、身体成分和体育活动的比较研究
简介COVID-19 大流行及其封锁限制迫使大学生减少了在校园的时间,增加了在家的时间,从而增加了他们的久坐行为。我们旨在更好地了解体育锻炼水平下降、心理健康症状增加和不良营养习惯增多的趋势。研究结果将有助于医疗保健临床医生制定有针对性的干预措施,改善大学生的整体健康状况:方法:对美国大学生(n = 90)和罗马尼亚大学生(n = 85)在后 COVID-19 封锁时代的当前自我报告的体育锻炼水平、心理健康症状和身体成分值进行评估:结果:所有参与者(N = 185;100 名女性)都表示自己非常喜欢运动(82.3%),目前的抑郁和焦虑症状水平较高(58.2%)。美国大学生(BF:男生 26.66 12.24%,女生 32.88 10.13%)和罗马尼亚大学生(BF:男生 11.76 6.68%,女生 18.07 9.30%)的体脂百分比(BF)和骨骼肌质量(SKMM)测量值之间存在差异。尽管存在这些差异,但所有参与者的抑郁和焦虑症状与 BF 之间呈正相关(R = 0.23;p = 0.0018),抑郁和焦虑症状与 SKMM 之间呈负相关(R = - 0.15;p = 0.04):尽管文化差异可能有助于解释体脂率和骨骼肌质量之间的差异,但两组大学生都同样在抑郁和焦虑症状中挣扎。两组大学生在被禁闭后所采取的应对机制并没有完全有效地改善他们的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creatine Supplementation May Attenuate the Decrement in Exercise Performance during Low Carbohydrate Diets in Recreationally Trained Individuals Attenuation of Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness with Acute Consumption of Essential Amino Acids A Comparative Study of Mental Health, Body Composition, and Physical Activity in American vs Romanian College Students After COVID-19 Lockdown The Effects of a Multi-Ingredient Dietary Supplement on Recovery from Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1