Exploring the Role of Self-Efficacy in Station Rotation: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Literacy Skills Among Primary Learners

M. L. Oktarianto, Arif Hidayat, Abdul Gofur, Wayan Dasna, Лутфи Октарианто, Ариф Хидаят, Абдул Гофур, Ваян Дасна
{"title":"Exploring the Role of Self-Efficacy in Station Rotation: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Literacy Skills Among Primary Learners","authors":"M. L. Oktarianto, Arif Hidayat, Abdul Gofur, Wayan Dasna, Лутфи Октарианто, Ариф Хидаят, Абдул Гофур, Ваян Дасна","doi":"10.17759/pse.2024290310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on examining how the Station Rotation model and self efficacy in their abilities affect their critical thinking and literacy skills in primary schools. The study engaged 217 students from 5 schools in Malang City, Indonesia. They were divided into an experimental cohort (n=105) and a control cohort (n=112), with ages ranging from 10 to 11 years. The research was facilitated online via Zoom Meeting: the experimental group was exposed to the Station Rotation model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching. The participants were chosen through cluster random sampling based on geographic locations. The study employed a quasi-experimental structure with both pre-test and post-test control group configurations. Instruments used included 30 self-efficacy queries, 5 critical thinking assessments, and 20 literacy evaluations. Reading scores from both the pre-test and post-test were further examined using the SMOG formula. The gathered data underwent manual multivariate examination using Hahs-Vaughn's formula. Key findings indicated: (1) the Station Rotation model significantly boosted students' critical thinking (sig = 0.000) and literacy abilities (sig = 0.000); (2) varying self-efficacy levels notably impacted learning results in critical thinking (sig = 0.044) and literacy (sig = 0.043); and (3) no discernible correlation existed between the teaching models and self-efficacy regarding critical thinking (sig = 0.715) and literacy abilities (sig = 0.219). This teaching methodology offers valuable insights for educators, highlighting its feasibility for full online application, particularly during challenging periods like pandemics where resources might be constrained.","PeriodicalId":507500,"journal":{"name":"Психологическая наука и образование","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Психологическая наука и образование","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2024290310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focused on examining how the Station Rotation model and self efficacy in their abilities affect their critical thinking and literacy skills in primary schools. The study engaged 217 students from 5 schools in Malang City, Indonesia. They were divided into an experimental cohort (n=105) and a control cohort (n=112), with ages ranging from 10 to 11 years. The research was facilitated online via Zoom Meeting: the experimental group was exposed to the Station Rotation model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching. The participants were chosen through cluster random sampling based on geographic locations. The study employed a quasi-experimental structure with both pre-test and post-test control group configurations. Instruments used included 30 self-efficacy queries, 5 critical thinking assessments, and 20 literacy evaluations. Reading scores from both the pre-test and post-test were further examined using the SMOG formula. The gathered data underwent manual multivariate examination using Hahs-Vaughn's formula. Key findings indicated: (1) the Station Rotation model significantly boosted students' critical thinking (sig = 0.000) and literacy abilities (sig = 0.000); (2) varying self-efficacy levels notably impacted learning results in critical thinking (sig = 0.044) and literacy (sig = 0.043); and (3) no discernible correlation existed between the teaching models and self-efficacy regarding critical thinking (sig = 0.715) and literacy abilities (sig = 0.219). This teaching methodology offers valuable insights for educators, highlighting its feasibility for full online application, particularly during challenging periods like pandemics where resources might be constrained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索自我效能在站点轮换中的作用:提高小学生的批判性思维和读写能力
本研究的重点是探讨 "站点轮换 "模式和自我效能感如何影响小学学生的批判性思维和读写能力。研究涉及印度尼西亚玛琅市 5 所学校的 217 名学生。他们被分为实验组(人数=105)和对照组(人数=112),年龄在 10 至 11 岁之间。研究通过 Zoom Meeting 在线进行:实验组采用站点轮换教学模式,对照组采用传统教学模式。参与者是根据地理位置通过群组随机抽样选出的。该研究采用了准实验结构,包括前测和后测对照组配置。使用的工具包括 30 个自我效能查询、5 个批判性思维评估和 20 个读写能力评估。使用 SMOG 公式进一步检验了前测和后测的阅读得分。使用 Hahs-Vaughn 公式对收集的数据进行了人工多变量检验。主要研究结果表明:(1) 车站轮换教学模式明显提高了学生的批判性思维能力(sig = 0.000)和读写能力(sig = 0.000);(2) 不同的自我效能感水平明显影响了批判性思维(sig = 0.044)和读写能力(sig = 0.043)的学习效果;(3) 教学模式与批判性思维(sig = 0.715)和读写能力(sig = 0.219)的自我效能感之间不存在明显的相关性。这种教学方法为教育工作者提供了宝贵的启示,突出了其全面在线应用的可行性,特别是在大流行病等挑战性时期,资源可能会受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Big Five Personality Traits as a moderator of the Relationship between Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety and Creative Personality The Specifics of Higher Mental Functions in Children with a Leading Left Hand The Relationship of the Attitude to Cheating with Social Beliefs and the Supposed Attitude of Others in High School Students Methodological Foundations for the Formation of Universal Educational Actions in the Context of the Ideas of the V.S. Mukhina’s Concept “Phenomenology of Personality Development and Being” Exploring the Role of Self-Efficacy in Station Rotation: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Literacy Skills Among Primary Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1