Effect of recorded maternal voice on procedure pain - a double blinded randomized controlled trial

Deeksha Patel, Cecilia M.S, Aditi Prashant Sinha, Sameer Bakhshi
{"title":"Effect of recorded maternal voice on procedure pain - a double blinded randomized controlled trial","authors":"Deeksha Patel, Cecilia M.S, Aditi Prashant Sinha, Sameer Bakhshi","doi":"10.26714/seanr.6.2.2024.61-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This double-blinded randomized controlled trial included 46 children between 4 to 12 years of age with haematological malignancy, scheduled for bone marrow examination at tertiary care hospital of India. Subjects were enrolled into two groups (23 each) by stratified random sampling based on the type of procedure scheduled to them. The maternal voice was recorded for 3 minutes before the procedure and headphones was placed during the procedure, for all children but maternal voice was played only to intervention group by another person to blind the researcher. Child’s cooperation for the entire procedure was recorded as video by researcher and later video was rated using FLACC behavioural scale. Pain perception was rated by children using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale. The results showed a significant difference in the level of child’s cooperation with mean (SD) distress score of 7(2) in control group and 4.52(2.15) in the intervention group (p=0.0002). There was no significant difference in pain perception of control and intervention groups. Significant moderate positive correlation (0.31) was found in the child’s distress and pain perception levels (p=0.03). There was significant negative association of age was found with the child’s distress (-0.30) and pain perception level (-0.33) at (p=0.04, 0.02) respectively. In cconclusion, recorded maternal voice can significantly decrease the child’s distress level thus improve the child’s cooperation during bone marrow examination along with local anaesthesia.  As the child’s cooperation increased, the child perceived less pain during the procedure. Older children were more cooperative and perceived less pain as compared to younger ones. Nurses are at an ideal position to implement this cost-effective, non-pharmacological intervention for children undergoing bone marrow examination.","PeriodicalId":250644,"journal":{"name":"South East Asia Nursing Research","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South East Asia Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26714/seanr.6.2.2024.61-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This double-blinded randomized controlled trial included 46 children between 4 to 12 years of age with haematological malignancy, scheduled for bone marrow examination at tertiary care hospital of India. Subjects were enrolled into two groups (23 each) by stratified random sampling based on the type of procedure scheduled to them. The maternal voice was recorded for 3 minutes before the procedure and headphones was placed during the procedure, for all children but maternal voice was played only to intervention group by another person to blind the researcher. Child’s cooperation for the entire procedure was recorded as video by researcher and later video was rated using FLACC behavioural scale. Pain perception was rated by children using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale. The results showed a significant difference in the level of child’s cooperation with mean (SD) distress score of 7(2) in control group and 4.52(2.15) in the intervention group (p=0.0002). There was no significant difference in pain perception of control and intervention groups. Significant moderate positive correlation (0.31) was found in the child’s distress and pain perception levels (p=0.03). There was significant negative association of age was found with the child’s distress (-0.30) and pain perception level (-0.33) at (p=0.04, 0.02) respectively. In cconclusion, recorded maternal voice can significantly decrease the child’s distress level thus improve the child’s cooperation during bone marrow examination along with local anaesthesia.  As the child’s cooperation increased, the child perceived less pain during the procedure. Older children were more cooperative and perceived less pain as compared to younger ones. Nurses are at an ideal position to implement this cost-effective, non-pharmacological intervention for children undergoing bone marrow examination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产妇声音录音对手术疼痛的影响--双盲随机对照试验
这项双盲随机对照试验包括 46 名 4 至 12 岁患有血液恶性肿瘤的儿童,他们都被安排在印度的三级医院进行骨髓检查。受试者根据预定手术的类型分层随机抽样,分为两组(每组 23 人)。所有儿童在手术前都会被录制 3 分钟的母亲声音,在手术过程中都会戴上耳机,但只有干预组的母亲声音会由另一人播放,以蒙蔽研究人员。研究人员将儿童在整个过程中的合作情况录制成视频,随后使用 FLACC 行为量表对视频进行评分。儿童使用 Wong-Baker 脸部疼痛评分量表对疼痛感进行评分。结果显示,对照组和干预组患儿的合作程度有明显差异,对照组患儿的平均(标清)痛苦评分为 7(2)分,干预组患儿的平均(标清)痛苦评分为 4.52(2.15)分(P=0.0002)。对照组和干预组的疼痛感无明显差异。儿童的痛苦感和疼痛感水平呈显著的中度正相关(0.31)(P=0.03)。年龄与患儿的痛苦感(-0.30)和疼痛感(-0.33)呈明显的负相关(P=0.04,0.02)。总之,在进行局部麻醉的同时进行骨髓检查时,录制的母亲声音可明显降低患儿的痛苦程度,从而提高患儿的配合度。 随着患儿配合度的提高,患儿在检查过程中感受到的疼痛也会减少。与年龄较小的儿童相比,年龄较大的儿童更加合作,感受到的疼痛也更少。护士是对接受骨髓检查的儿童实施这种具有成本效益的非药物干预的理想人选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of aromatherapy to treat PONV in patients post neurosurgery Bibliometric analysis of publication trends of bullying interventions in preschool age children Degree of anaemia based on treatment period, type of OAT, and BTA status in intensive-phase pulmonary tuberculosis patients Impact of Single vs Combination Anti-Hyperglycemic Drug Therapy on HbA1c Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study Effect of recorded maternal voice on procedure pain - a double blinded randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1