The Impact of Fintech Innovations on Traditional Banking Systems

Belinda Nkatekho
{"title":"The Impact of Fintech Innovations on Traditional Banking Systems","authors":"Belinda Nkatekho","doi":"10.47941/ijf.2116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study sought to explore the impact of fintech innovations on traditional banking systems. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the impact of fintech innovations on traditional banking systems. Preliminary empirical review revealed that fintech innovations had significantly transformed the financial industry, presenting both opportunities and challenges for traditional banking systems. It revealed that while fintech solutions enhanced operational efficiencies and customer satisfaction, traditional banks needed to adopt strategic planning and agile adaptation to maintain their competitiveness. The study highlighted the importance of collaboration between fintech firms and traditional banks, emphasizing the need for a balanced regulatory approach to foster innovation while ensuring financial stability. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Disruptive Innovation Theory, Diffusion of Innovations Theory and the Resource Based View Theory may be used to anchor future studies on fintech innovations on traditional banking systems. The study recommended that traditional banks embrace digital transformation by investing in technology infrastructure, fostering innovation, and upskilling employees. It suggested forming strategic partnerships with fintech firms to leverage technological advancements and enhance competitiveness. The study also advised policymakers to update regulatory frameworks to support innovation and maintain financial stability, while promoting financial literacy and inclusion. Lastly, it called for continuous dialogue and collaboration among all stakeholders to address challenges and seize opportunities presented by fintech innovations.","PeriodicalId":508423,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijf.2116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to explore the impact of fintech innovations on traditional banking systems. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the impact of fintech innovations on traditional banking systems. Preliminary empirical review revealed that fintech innovations had significantly transformed the financial industry, presenting both opportunities and challenges for traditional banking systems. It revealed that while fintech solutions enhanced operational efficiencies and customer satisfaction, traditional banks needed to adopt strategic planning and agile adaptation to maintain their competitiveness. The study highlighted the importance of collaboration between fintech firms and traditional banks, emphasizing the need for a balanced regulatory approach to foster innovation while ensuring financial stability. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Disruptive Innovation Theory, Diffusion of Innovations Theory and the Resource Based View Theory may be used to anchor future studies on fintech innovations on traditional banking systems. The study recommended that traditional banks embrace digital transformation by investing in technology infrastructure, fostering innovation, and upskilling employees. It suggested forming strategic partnerships with fintech firms to leverage technological advancements and enhance competitiveness. The study also advised policymakers to update regulatory frameworks to support innovation and maintain financial stability, while promoting financial literacy and inclusion. Lastly, it called for continuous dialogue and collaboration among all stakeholders to address challenges and seize opportunities presented by fintech innovations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融科技创新对传统银行系统的影响
目的:本研究旨在探讨金融科技创新对传统银行系统的影响。研究方法:本研究采用案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地调查即可收集到的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及管理人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在金融科技创新对传统银行系统的影响方面存在背景和方法上的差距。初步实证审查显示,金融科技创新极大地改变了金融业,为传统银行系统带来了机遇和挑战。研究显示,虽然金融科技解决方案提高了运营效率和客户满意度,但传统银行需要通过战略规划和灵活调整来保持竞争力。研究强调了金融科技公司与传统银行之间合作的重要性,强调需要采取平衡的监管方法,在确保金融稳定的同时促进创新。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:颠覆性创新理论、创新扩散理论和资源观理论可用于未来有关金融科技创新对传统银行系统影响的研究。研究建议传统银行通过投资技术基础设施、促进创新和提高员工技能来迎接数字化转型。研究建议与金融科技公司建立战略合作伙伴关系,以利用技术进步和提高竞争力。研究还建议决策者更新监管框架,以支持创新和维护金融稳定,同时促进金融知识普及和金融包容性。最后,研究呼吁所有利益相关方继续开展对话与合作,以应对金融科技创新带来的挑战并抓住机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavioral Finance: Investor Psychology and Market Outcomes Cryptocurrency and Its Role in Portfolio Diversification The Impact of Fintech Innovations on Traditional Banking Systems Challenges for the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending Market Effect of Financial Accountability Practices on Financial Sustainability of Micro Finance Institutions in Garissa County, Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1