A Comparative Literature Review of Machine Learning and Image Processing Techniques Used for Scaling and Grading of Wood Logs

Forests Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.3390/f15071243
Yohann Jacob Sandvik, C. Futsæther, K. H. Liland, O. Tomic
{"title":"A Comparative Literature Review of Machine Learning and Image Processing Techniques Used for Scaling and Grading of Wood Logs","authors":"Yohann Jacob Sandvik, C. Futsæther, K. H. Liland, O. Tomic","doi":"10.3390/f15071243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This literature review assesses the efficacy of image-processing techniques and machine-learning models in computer vision for wood log grading and scaling. Four searches were conducted in four scientific databases, yielding a total of 1288 results, which were narrowed down to 33 relevant studies. The studies were categorized according to their goals, including log end grading, log side grading, individual log scaling, log pile scaling, and log segmentation. The studies were compared based on the input used, choice of model, model performance, and level of autonomy. This review found a preference for images over point cloud representations for logs and an increase in camera use over laser scanners. It identified three primary model types: classical image-processing algorithms, deep learning models, and other machine learning models. However, comparing performance across studies proved challenging due to varying goals and metrics. Deep learning models showed better performance in the log pile scaling and log segmentation goal categories. Cameras were found to have become more popular over time compared to laser scanners, possibly due to stereovision cameras taking over for laser scanners for sampling point cloud datasets. Classical image-processing algorithms were consistently used, deep learning models gained prominence in 2018, and other machine learning models were used in studies published between 2010 and 2018.","PeriodicalId":505742,"journal":{"name":"Forests","volume":" 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This literature review assesses the efficacy of image-processing techniques and machine-learning models in computer vision for wood log grading and scaling. Four searches were conducted in four scientific databases, yielding a total of 1288 results, which were narrowed down to 33 relevant studies. The studies were categorized according to their goals, including log end grading, log side grading, individual log scaling, log pile scaling, and log segmentation. The studies were compared based on the input used, choice of model, model performance, and level of autonomy. This review found a preference for images over point cloud representations for logs and an increase in camera use over laser scanners. It identified three primary model types: classical image-processing algorithms, deep learning models, and other machine learning models. However, comparing performance across studies proved challenging due to varying goals and metrics. Deep learning models showed better performance in the log pile scaling and log segmentation goal categories. Cameras were found to have become more popular over time compared to laser scanners, possibly due to stereovision cameras taking over for laser scanners for sampling point cloud datasets. Classical image-processing algorithms were consistently used, deep learning models gained prominence in 2018, and other machine learning models were used in studies published between 2010 and 2018.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于对原木进行缩放和分级的机器学习和图像处理技术比较文献综述
本文献综述评估了计算机视觉中图像处理技术和机器学习模型在木材原木分级和缩放方面的功效。我们在四个科学数据库中进行了四次搜索,共获得 1288 项结果,最后筛选出 33 项相关研究。这些研究根据其目标进行了分类,包括原木端部分级、原木侧面分级、单个原木缩放、原木堆缩放和原木分割。根据所使用的输入、模型选择、模型性能和自主程度对这些研究进行了比较。该研究发现,原木图像比点云表示法更受欢迎,相机的使用也比激光扫描仪多。它确定了三种主要模型类型:经典图像处理算法、深度学习模型和其他机器学习模型。然而,由于目标和衡量标准不同,比较不同研究的性能具有挑战性。深度学习模型在对数堆缩放和对数分割目标类别中表现更佳。研究发现,随着时间的推移,相机比激光扫描仪更受欢迎,这可能是由于在点云数据集采样方面,立体视觉相机取代了激光扫描仪。经典图像处理算法一直在使用,深度学习模型在2018年获得了突出地位,其他机器学习模型在2010年至2018年期间发表的研究中也有使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exogenous Salicylic Acid Alleviates Physiological Stress in Salix matsudana Seedlings and Increases 2,4-Dinitrophenol Removal Dynamic Changes in Endogenous Substances in Flowering Organs of Camellia drupifera during the Flowering Stage Relationship between Plant Habitat Types and Butterfly Diversity in Urban Mountain Parks Xylogenesis Responses to a Mediterranean Climate in Holm Oak (Quercus ilex L.) The Characteristics and Influential Factors of Earthworm and Vermicompost under Different Land Use in a Temperate Area, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1