Relationship between Plant Habitat Types and Butterfly Diversity in Urban Mountain Parks

Forests Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.3390/f15081390
Shanjun Huang, Ying Lin, Jiaying Dong, Yuxin Lin, Ziang Su, Junyi Li, Yanqin Zhang, Jiali Jin, Weicong Fu
{"title":"Relationship between Plant Habitat Types and Butterfly Diversity in Urban Mountain Parks","authors":"Shanjun Huang, Ying Lin, Jiaying Dong, Yuxin Lin, Ziang Su, Junyi Li, Yanqin Zhang, Jiali Jin, Weicong Fu","doi":"10.3390/f15081390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Butterflies serve as valuable indicators of urban ecosystem quality. Due to their accessibility, they also provide urban residents with essential opportunities to connect with nature, fulfilling social functions such as education and recreation, which significantly contribute to city dwellers’ physical and mental well-being. Urban mountain parks are critical habitats for butterflies; analyzing their spatial and temporal distribution and the impact of plant elements is crucial for enhancing plant landscape quality and butterfly diversity. The main results were as follows: (1) A monthly butterfly survey was carried out over the course of a year in the seven urban mountain parks of Fuzhou City. This survey recorded 46 species of butterflies from 36 genera across 7 families, totaling 2506 butterflies. (2) Among the seven habitat types analyzed, TS-, T-, and SG-habitats exhibited elevated levels of butterfly diversity, richness, abundance, and evenness. There were variations in butterfly evenness, diversity, richness, and abundance observed between these habitats. With the exception of N-habitat, there was a consistent seasonal pattern in butterfly diversity across different habitat types. (3) Butterfly diversity and abundance were significantly correlated with vegetation habitat factors across the tree, shrub, and herb layers. Multiple regression modeling using the Akaike information criterion revealed that arbor layer vegetation factors were present in the top four models for butterfly diversity, richness, abundance, and evenness. (4) The quality assessment of different habitat types ranked habitats as follows: TS-habitat > SG-habitat > TSG-habitat > T-habitat > TG-habitat > G-habitat = N-habitat.","PeriodicalId":505742,"journal":{"name":"Forests","volume":"59 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15081390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Butterflies serve as valuable indicators of urban ecosystem quality. Due to their accessibility, they also provide urban residents with essential opportunities to connect with nature, fulfilling social functions such as education and recreation, which significantly contribute to city dwellers’ physical and mental well-being. Urban mountain parks are critical habitats for butterflies; analyzing their spatial and temporal distribution and the impact of plant elements is crucial for enhancing plant landscape quality and butterfly diversity. The main results were as follows: (1) A monthly butterfly survey was carried out over the course of a year in the seven urban mountain parks of Fuzhou City. This survey recorded 46 species of butterflies from 36 genera across 7 families, totaling 2506 butterflies. (2) Among the seven habitat types analyzed, TS-, T-, and SG-habitats exhibited elevated levels of butterfly diversity, richness, abundance, and evenness. There were variations in butterfly evenness, diversity, richness, and abundance observed between these habitats. With the exception of N-habitat, there was a consistent seasonal pattern in butterfly diversity across different habitat types. (3) Butterfly diversity and abundance were significantly correlated with vegetation habitat factors across the tree, shrub, and herb layers. Multiple regression modeling using the Akaike information criterion revealed that arbor layer vegetation factors were present in the top four models for butterfly diversity, richness, abundance, and evenness. (4) The quality assessment of different habitat types ranked habitats as follows: TS-habitat > SG-habitat > TSG-habitat > T-habitat > TG-habitat > G-habitat = N-habitat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市山地公园植物栖息地类型与蝴蝶多样性之间的关系
蝴蝶是城市生态系统质量的重要指标。由于交通便利,它们还为城市居民提供了与自然接触的重要机会,实现了教育和娱乐等社会功能,极大地促进了城市居民的身心健康。城市山地公园是蝴蝶的重要栖息地,分析其时空分布和植物元素的影响对于提高植物景观质量和蝴蝶多样性至关重要。主要成果如下(1) 在福州市 7 个城市山地公园开展了为期一年的月度蝴蝶调查。调查记录了 7 科 36 属 46 种蝴蝶,共计 2506 只。(2)在分析的七种栖息地类型中,TS、T 和 SG 型栖息地的蝴蝶多样性、丰富度、丰度和均匀度都较高。这些生境之间的蝴蝶均匀度、多样性、丰富度和丰度存在差异。除 N 栖息地外,不同类型栖息地的蝴蝶多样性具有一致的季节性模式。(3)在乔木、灌木和草本层中,蝴蝶的多样性和丰度与植被生境因子有显著相关性。利用 Akaike 信息准则建立的多元回归模型显示,乔木层植被因子出现在蝴蝶多样性、丰富度、丰度和均匀度的前四个模型中。(4) 不同栖息地类型的质量评估将栖息地排序如下:TS栖息地 > SG栖息地 > TSG栖息地 > T栖息地 > TG栖息地 > G栖息地 = N栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exogenous Salicylic Acid Alleviates Physiological Stress in Salix matsudana Seedlings and Increases 2,4-Dinitrophenol Removal Dynamic Changes in Endogenous Substances in Flowering Organs of Camellia drupifera during the Flowering Stage Relationship between Plant Habitat Types and Butterfly Diversity in Urban Mountain Parks Xylogenesis Responses to a Mediterranean Climate in Holm Oak (Quercus ilex L.) The Characteristics and Influential Factors of Earthworm and Vermicompost under Different Land Use in a Temperate Area, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1