Associations Between Running Mechanics, Functional Lower Extremity Strength, and Stress Urinary Incontinence in Parous Female Runners

Nicole J. Ron, Sarah C. Dolbinski, Elizabeth G. Hodonicky, Darby O. Middlebrook, Sally R. Olmstead, Sandra L. Olsen, Eyal D. Ron, John H Hollman
{"title":"Associations Between Running Mechanics, Functional Lower Extremity Strength, and Stress Urinary Incontinence in Parous Female Runners","authors":"Nicole J. Ron, Sarah C. Dolbinski, Elizabeth G. Hodonicky, Darby O. Middlebrook, Sally R. Olmstead, Sandra L. Olsen, Eyal D. Ron, John H Hollman","doi":"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may have altered running mechanics and reduced hip muscle strength compared with women without SUI. Little research has examined running metrics and functional lower extremity strength of parous runners.\n \n \n \n To determine whether SUI severity correlates with running metrics and lower extremity muscle strength among parous women.\n \n \n \n This was a cross-sectional observational study of 22 parous participants (mean age 39.8 years, with a mean of 3.4 pregnancies and 8.1-year interval since last delivery).\n \n \n \n Participants completed the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI), Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Colorectal-Anal Distress (CRAD) Inventory-8, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6), and Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) and provided demographic, relevant running, and obstetric/gynecologic history information. After a brief warm-up, participants completed 30-second single-leg sit-to-stand tests bilaterally and a standardized 10-minute treadmill run with pod cadence assessment. Pearson-product moment correlation coefficients were calculated (α = .05).\n \n \n \n Prolonged ground contact times were associated with higher ICIQ-UI SF (r= 0.523, P= .015), POPDI-6 (r= 0.694, P< .001), and UDI-6 scores (r= 0.577, P= .006), while lower cadences were associated with higher POPDI-6 (r=−0.550, P= .010) and UDI-6 scores (r=−0.444, P= .044).\n \n \n \n Parous female runners with more severe SUI and prolapse symptoms demonstrate altered running mechanics characterized by prolonged ground contact times and slower cadences.\n","PeriodicalId":518889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women's &amp; Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women's &amp; Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may have altered running mechanics and reduced hip muscle strength compared with women without SUI. Little research has examined running metrics and functional lower extremity strength of parous runners. To determine whether SUI severity correlates with running metrics and lower extremity muscle strength among parous women. This was a cross-sectional observational study of 22 parous participants (mean age 39.8 years, with a mean of 3.4 pregnancies and 8.1-year interval since last delivery). Participants completed the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI), Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Colorectal-Anal Distress (CRAD) Inventory-8, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6), and Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) and provided demographic, relevant running, and obstetric/gynecologic history information. After a brief warm-up, participants completed 30-second single-leg sit-to-stand tests bilaterally and a standardized 10-minute treadmill run with pod cadence assessment. Pearson-product moment correlation coefficients were calculated (α = .05). Prolonged ground contact times were associated with higher ICIQ-UI SF (r= 0.523, P= .015), POPDI-6 (r= 0.694, P< .001), and UDI-6 scores (r= 0.577, P= .006), while lower cadences were associated with higher POPDI-6 (r=−0.550, P= .010) and UDI-6 scores (r=−0.444, P= .044). Parous female runners with more severe SUI and prolapse symptoms demonstrate altered running mechanics characterized by prolonged ground contact times and slower cadences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瘫痪女性跑步者的跑步力学、下肢功能性力量与压力性尿失禁之间的关系
与没有压力性尿失禁(SUI)的女性相比,患有压力性尿失禁(SUI)的女性可能会改变跑步力学并降低髋部肌肉力量。很少有研究对准女性跑步者的跑步指标和下肢功能性力量进行研究。 目的是确定 SUI 的严重程度是否与正常女性的跑步指标和下肢肌肉力量相关。 这是一项横断面观察性研究,共有 22 名准妈妈参加(平均年龄 39.8 岁,平均怀孕 3.4 次,与上次分娩间隔 8.1 年)。 参与者填写了尿失禁国际咨询问卷-尿失禁简表(ICIQ-UI)、尿窘迫量表-6(UDI-6)、结肠直肠肛门窘迫量表(CRAD)-8、盆腔器官脱垂窘迫量表-6(POPDI-6)和尿失禁诊断问卷(QUID),并提供了人口统计学、相关跑步和妇产科病史信息。在简短的热身运动后,参与者完成了双侧 30 秒单腿坐立测试和 10 分钟的标准化跑步机跑步,并进行了脚步评估。计算了皮尔逊-产品矩相关系数(α = .05)。 较长的地面接触时间与较高的 ICIQ-UI SF (r= 0.523, P= .015)、POPDI-6 (r= 0.694, P< .001) 和 UDI-6 分数 (r= 0.577, P= .006) 相关,而较低的步频与较高的 POPDI-6 (r=-0.550, P= .010) 和 UDI-6 分数 (r=-0.444, P= .044) 相关。 有较严重 SUI 和脱垂症状的雌性parous跑步者表现出跑步力学的改变,其特点是地面接触时间延长和跑步速度减慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Running Mechanics, Functional Lower Extremity Strength, and Stress Urinary Incontinence in Parous Female Runners The Development and Content Validity of the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) for Use in People With Persistent Perineal Pain Empowering Pelvic Health: The Impact of the New Research Committee Dilation Outcomes for Transgender and Nonbinary Patients Following Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty in a US County Safety-Net System Prevalence, Bother, and Risk Factors Associated With Occurrence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Young Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1