The Development and Content Validity of the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) for Use in People With Persistent Perineal Pain

Amanda Hardy, Leigh Campbell, Carol Jones, Carolyn Vandyken, Jilly Bond, Penny Moss, Anne Smith, Benedict Wand, Judith Thompson
{"title":"The Development and Content Validity of the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) for Use in People With Persistent Perineal Pain","authors":"Amanda Hardy, Leigh Campbell, Carol Jones, Carolyn Vandyken, Jilly Bond, Penny Moss, Anne Smith, Benedict Wand, Judith Thompson","doi":"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Altered body awareness and perception comprise a common feature of persistent pain. The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) was developed to assess body awareness and perception in people with back pain. There is no tool to measure these changes in people with persistent perineal pain.\n \n \n \n To develop the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) to assess body awareness and perception in people with persistent perineal pain. To evaluate content validity using a qualitative survey.\n \n \n \n Modified electronic Delphi and cross-sectional qualitative online survey.\n \n \n \n A focus group developed a draft questionnaire from the preexisting FreBAQ. A preliminary FrePAQ was developed through 3 Delphi rounds of anonymous voting by a panel of 14 experts. A qualitative survey was completed by individuals with persistent perineal pain to evaluate the comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and relevance of the preliminary questionnaire. Responses were thematically analyzed, and demographic data were summarized descriptively.\n \n \n \n Fourteen panel participants completed the Delphi study, with consensus achieved on a 9-item questionnaire after 3 rounds. One hundred thirty-five participants with persistent perineal pain completed the round 1 validation survey. Changes were made to the introduction and 7 items. A new group of 53 participants completed round 2, resulting in final changes to the introduction and 2 of the 9 items.\n \n \n \n An expert consensus was achieved in the wording of a new questionnaire aimed at assessing body awareness and perception in people with persistent perineal pain, which demonstrated acceptable content validity.\n","PeriodicalId":518889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","volume":"216 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Altered body awareness and perception comprise a common feature of persistent pain. The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) was developed to assess body awareness and perception in people with back pain. There is no tool to measure these changes in people with persistent perineal pain. To develop the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) to assess body awareness and perception in people with persistent perineal pain. To evaluate content validity using a qualitative survey. Modified electronic Delphi and cross-sectional qualitative online survey. A focus group developed a draft questionnaire from the preexisting FreBAQ. A preliminary FrePAQ was developed through 3 Delphi rounds of anonymous voting by a panel of 14 experts. A qualitative survey was completed by individuals with persistent perineal pain to evaluate the comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and relevance of the preliminary questionnaire. Responses were thematically analyzed, and demographic data were summarized descriptively. Fourteen panel participants completed the Delphi study, with consensus achieved on a 9-item questionnaire after 3 rounds. One hundred thirty-five participants with persistent perineal pain completed the round 1 validation survey. Changes were made to the introduction and 7 items. A new group of 53 participants completed round 2, resulting in final changes to the introduction and 2 of the 9 items. An expert consensus was achieved in the wording of a new questionnaire aimed at assessing body awareness and perception in people with persistent perineal pain, which demonstrated acceptable content validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于顽固性会阴疼痛患者的弗里曼特尔会阴意识问卷(FrePAQ)的开发与内容有效性
身体意识和感知的改变是持续性疼痛的一个共同特征。弗里曼特尔背部意识问卷(Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire,FreBAQ)就是为了评估背部疼痛患者的身体意识和知觉而开发的。目前还没有一种工具可以测量持续性会阴疼痛患者的这些变化。 开发弗里曼特尔会阴意识问卷(FrePAQ),以评估持续性会阴疼痛患者的身体意识和感知。使用定性调查评估内容有效性。 修改后的电子德尔菲和横断面定性在线调查。 一个焦点小组根据已有的 FreBAQ 制定了一份问卷草案。由 14 位专家组成的小组通过 3 轮德尔菲匿名投票制定了初步的 FrePAQ。持续性会阴疼痛患者完成了一项定性调查,以评估初步问卷的全面性、可理解性和相关性。对回答进行了主题分析,并对人口统计学数据进行了描述性总结。 14 名小组参与者完成了德尔菲研究,经过三轮研究后就 9 个项目的问卷达成了共识。135 名患有持续性会阴疼痛的参与者完成了第一轮验证调查。对引言和 7 个项目进行了修改。新的一组 53 名参与者完成了第二轮调查,最终对引言和 9 个项目中的 2 个项目进行了修改。 专家们就新问卷的措辞达成了共识,新问卷旨在评估持续性会阴疼痛患者的身体意识和感知,其内容效度可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Running Mechanics, Functional Lower Extremity Strength, and Stress Urinary Incontinence in Parous Female Runners The Development and Content Validity of the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) for Use in People With Persistent Perineal Pain Empowering Pelvic Health: The Impact of the New Research Committee Dilation Outcomes for Transgender and Nonbinary Patients Following Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty in a US County Safety-Net System Prevalence, Bother, and Risk Factors Associated With Occurrence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Young Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1