Minjung Kim , Junyeong Yang , Chenxi Liu , Tuba Gezer , Jen D. Wong
{"title":"Applying dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) to examine the dynamics of students’ affect and learning goal achievement","authors":"Minjung Kim , Junyeong Yang , Chenxi Liu , Tuba Gezer , Jen D. Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Affect is a critical factor impacting students’ goal setting and goal achievement in learning. While existing studies have demonstrated the vital role of affect in learning and goal achievement, the day-to-day fluctuations of affect and their impact on learning have rarely been examined. This study explored the dynamic relationships between positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA), and daily learning goal achievement (LGA) in 72 college students ahead of a high-stakes test, analyzing 32 days of survey responses totaling 2111 observations. We employed dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) to assess the stability, variability, and potential reciprocal relationships of PA, NA, and LGA. Additionally, we investigated the effects of depression, age, and the number of semesters studied on these variables. Results indicated that PA, NA, and LGA remained stable over the observation period, with no systematic changes or trajectories, yet exhibited significant fluctuations within and between participants. All autoregressive effects for PA, NA, and LGA were significant. Both PA and NA were significantly related to concurrent measures of LGA, although no significant cross-lagged relationships between PA and NA were found. Variability in PA, NA, and LGA was significantly explained by students’ age, number of semesters studied, and level of depressive symptoms. Further findings and implications of the study are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Affect is a critical factor impacting students’ goal setting and goal achievement in learning. While existing studies have demonstrated the vital role of affect in learning and goal achievement, the day-to-day fluctuations of affect and their impact on learning have rarely been examined. This study explored the dynamic relationships between positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA), and daily learning goal achievement (LGA) in 72 college students ahead of a high-stakes test, analyzing 32 days of survey responses totaling 2111 observations. We employed dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) to assess the stability, variability, and potential reciprocal relationships of PA, NA, and LGA. Additionally, we investigated the effects of depression, age, and the number of semesters studied on these variables. Results indicated that PA, NA, and LGA remained stable over the observation period, with no systematic changes or trajectories, yet exhibited significant fluctuations within and between participants. All autoregressive effects for PA, NA, and LGA were significant. Both PA and NA were significantly related to concurrent measures of LGA, although no significant cross-lagged relationships between PA and NA were found. Variability in PA, NA, and LGA was significantly explained by students’ age, number of semesters studied, and level of depressive symptoms. Further findings and implications of the study are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.