Thermodynamic and economic analyses of the retrofit of existing electric power plants with fusion reactors

IF 7.1 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management-X Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100668
{"title":"Thermodynamic and economic analyses of the retrofit of existing electric power plants with fusion reactors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electricity generation will need to reach net zero emissions globally in 2050. This will require an increase in share of renewable energy and the implementation of a controllable carbon-free base-load source. Nuclear fusion is a promising option to decarbonize base-load electricity production but its capital cost still doubles the one of technologically more mature alternatives such as large photovoltaic fields or off-shore wind installations. Within this framework, the retrofit of a dismissed power-plant could allow significant cost savings, thus facilitating the realization of a fusion electricity demonstrator. Among fusion reactors, stellarators are a valid alternative to tokamaks thanks to the higher blanket temperature and inherent continuous operation. In this scenario, we posit the challenge to use a nuclear fusion stellarator-based reactor to retrofit conventional power plants (PPs). Specifically, we select a nuclear fission plant in France and a supercritical coal fired site in Italy, by constructing 4 different retrofit scenarios as a function of the re-used components. We compare each option with a greenfield and optimized plant with the same reactor thermal power. through a thermodynamic, economic, and investment analysis.</p><p>The results proves significant savings by retrofitting an existing plant, with a CapEx reduction up to <span><math><mrow><mn>50</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> compared to the greenfield plants. Specifically, the most convenient retrofit strategy is to select a site that already implements cutting edge thermodynamic parameters while reusing the most existing systems (i.e. buildings, steam cycle, electricity generation, and heat rejection). This is the case of the 2 x 660 MW<sub>e</sub> supercritical coal-fired plant in Italy. Therein, the LCOEs are 39 $/MWh and 51 $/MWh, calculated with an interest rate of <span><math><mrow><mn>2.7</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mn>6</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>, respectively, and compare with the conventional energy technologies. Moreover, such costs are competitive in the current European energy markets and yield significant net present values at the plant end of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001466/pdfft?md5=6f249f55fc13e2872cc7b17d94d89c64&pid=1-s2.0-S2590174524001466-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electricity generation will need to reach net zero emissions globally in 2050. This will require an increase in share of renewable energy and the implementation of a controllable carbon-free base-load source. Nuclear fusion is a promising option to decarbonize base-load electricity production but its capital cost still doubles the one of technologically more mature alternatives such as large photovoltaic fields or off-shore wind installations. Within this framework, the retrofit of a dismissed power-plant could allow significant cost savings, thus facilitating the realization of a fusion electricity demonstrator. Among fusion reactors, stellarators are a valid alternative to tokamaks thanks to the higher blanket temperature and inherent continuous operation. In this scenario, we posit the challenge to use a nuclear fusion stellarator-based reactor to retrofit conventional power plants (PPs). Specifically, we select a nuclear fission plant in France and a supercritical coal fired site in Italy, by constructing 4 different retrofit scenarios as a function of the re-used components. We compare each option with a greenfield and optimized plant with the same reactor thermal power. through a thermodynamic, economic, and investment analysis.

The results proves significant savings by retrofitting an existing plant, with a CapEx reduction up to 50% compared to the greenfield plants. Specifically, the most convenient retrofit strategy is to select a site that already implements cutting edge thermodynamic parameters while reusing the most existing systems (i.e. buildings, steam cycle, electricity generation, and heat rejection). This is the case of the 2 x 660 MWe supercritical coal-fired plant in Italy. Therein, the LCOEs are 39 $/MWh and 51 $/MWh, calculated with an interest rate of 2.7% and 6%, respectively, and compare with the conventional energy technologies. Moreover, such costs are competitive in the current European energy markets and yield significant net present values at the plant end of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用聚变反应堆改造现有发电厂的热力学和经济分析
2050 年,全球发电量必须达到净零排放。这就需要增加可再生能源的比例,并采用可控的无碳基本负荷源。核聚变是基础负荷发电去碳化的一个有前途的选择,但其资本成本仍然是大型光伏电场或离岸风力装置等技术更成熟的替代能源的两倍。在这一框架下,对已废弃的发电厂进行改造可以大大节省成本,从而促进聚变发电示范装置的实现。在核聚变反应堆中,恒星装置因其较高的毯式温度和固有的连续运行特性,成为托卡马克反应堆的有效替代品。在这种情况下,我们提出了使用基于核聚变恒星器的反应堆改造传统发电厂(PPs)的挑战。具体而言,我们选择了法国的一座核裂变电厂和意大利的一座超临界燃煤电厂,根据重复使用的组件构建了 4 种不同的改造方案。通过热力学、经济和投资分析,我们将每种方案与具有相同反应堆热功率的新建电厂和优化电厂进行了比较。结果表明,改造现有电厂可节省大量资金,与新建电厂相比,资本支出最多可减少 50%。具体来说,最方便的改造策略是选择一个已采用最先进热力学参数的厂址,同时重复使用现有的大部分系统(即建筑物、蒸汽循环、发电和排热)。意大利的 2 x 660 MWe 超临界燃煤电厂就是这种情况。按 2.7% 和 6% 的利率计算,其 LCOE 分别为 39 美元/兆瓦时和 51 美元/兆瓦时,可与传统能源技术相媲美。此外,这些成本在当前的欧洲能源市场上具有竞争力,并能在发电厂寿命结束时产生可观的净现值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability. The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.
期刊最新文献
Water desalination using waste heat recovery of thermal power plant in tropical climate; optimization by AI Thermal management performance of a novel elliptically grooved flat heat pipe system embedded with internally cooled condenser Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost of energy transport from Saudi Arabia with conventional fuels and liquefied natural gas Circulation of self-supplied water for significant energy recovery through heat integration A novel algorithm for optimizing genset operations to minimize fuel consumption in remote diesel-RES microgrids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1