D-Impact of the Various Strategies on the Author's Impact Score

S. H. Ahammad, P. P. Saradhi, Sandeep Dwarkanath Pande, Madhuri Navnath Gurav
{"title":"D-Impact of the Various Strategies on the Author's Impact Score","authors":"S. H. Ahammad, P. P. Saradhi, Sandeep Dwarkanath Pande, Madhuri Navnath Gurav","doi":"10.16920/jeet/2024/v38i1/24171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract :Classic feature of any research analytics system is to be able to provide a metric based on the given research data given like the citation count and other kinds of data it is important to analyze the given data and give feedback and understand performance of a given research department, Scholar or the research, So we used a novel approach to rate given person based on the research work and comparing it with different works published in the same area, it is to be noted that the score/rating only focuses on the domain rather than rating the whole scholars work this way we can estimate the scholar's performance with respect to one domain which several other types of ratings fail to do so. This method will act advantageously especially in research organizations where appraisals and giving research grants are usually done based on scholar's previous work in a specific domain. We were able to formulate results for 62 different authors from 8 different domains, these domains and authors were picked randomly so as to efficiently understand the working of the methodology we followed four essential steps in this approach namely gathering dataset, applying Glicko- 2 ranking algorithm, finding average rating value for all works finally calculating d-impact score using GPA method on the scale of 9. We can conclude that the result is a both domain-specific and more accurate representation of the author's impact. In work we gave introduction regarding methodology and description of existing technologies in section 1, In section-2 we described the need of the proposed methodology with few sample results in existing methodology and proposed one, In section-4 we described the methodology in step by step manner and also presented proposed algorithm with all the required formulae, In section-5 we presented analysis and actual summary of the results, In section-6 we presented the conclusion. Keywords : Author impact, D-impact score, Elo rating, Glicko-2, Research analytics.","PeriodicalId":52197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education Transformations","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education Transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v38i1/24171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract :Classic feature of any research analytics system is to be able to provide a metric based on the given research data given like the citation count and other kinds of data it is important to analyze the given data and give feedback and understand performance of a given research department, Scholar or the research, So we used a novel approach to rate given person based on the research work and comparing it with different works published in the same area, it is to be noted that the score/rating only focuses on the domain rather than rating the whole scholars work this way we can estimate the scholar's performance with respect to one domain which several other types of ratings fail to do so. This method will act advantageously especially in research organizations where appraisals and giving research grants are usually done based on scholar's previous work in a specific domain. We were able to formulate results for 62 different authors from 8 different domains, these domains and authors were picked randomly so as to efficiently understand the working of the methodology we followed four essential steps in this approach namely gathering dataset, applying Glicko- 2 ranking algorithm, finding average rating value for all works finally calculating d-impact score using GPA method on the scale of 9. We can conclude that the result is a both domain-specific and more accurate representation of the author's impact. In work we gave introduction regarding methodology and description of existing technologies in section 1, In section-2 we described the need of the proposed methodology with few sample results in existing methodology and proposed one, In section-4 we described the methodology in step by step manner and also presented proposed algorithm with all the required formulae, In section-5 we presented analysis and actual summary of the results, In section-6 we presented the conclusion. Keywords : Author impact, D-impact score, Elo rating, Glicko-2, Research analytics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
D-各种策略对作者影响得分的影响
摘要 :任何研究分析系统的典型特征都是能够根据给定的研究数据(如引用次数和其他类型的数据)提供一个度量标准,重要的是要分析给定的数据并给出反馈,了解给定的研究部门、学者或研究的表现、因此,我们采用了一种新颖的方法,根据研究工作对给定人员进行评分,并将其与同一领域发表的不同作品进行比较,需要注意的是,评分/评级只关注领域,而不是对学者的全部工作进行评分,这样我们就可以估算出学者在某一领域的表现,而其他几种评级方法都无法做到这一点。特别是在研究机构中,通常会根据学者以前在特定领域的工作来进行评估和发放研究补助金,因此这种方法非常有用。为了有效了解该方法的工作原理,我们遵循了该方法的四个基本步骤,即收集数据集、应用 Glicko- 2 排名算法、找出所有作品的平均评分值,最后使用 GPA 方法计算出 9 分制的 d-impact 分数。在作品中,我们在第 1 部分介绍了方法和现有技术,在第 2 部分描述了建议方法的必要性,并提供了现有方法和建议方法的一些样本结果,在第 4 部分,我们逐步描述了方法,并介绍了建议算法和所有必要的公式,在第 5 部分,我们对结果进行了分析和实际总结,在第 6 部分,我们给出了结论。关键词 :作者影响力、D-影响力评分、Elo 评分、Glicko-2、研究分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
期刊最新文献
Problem-Based Learning for Critical Reflections on Skill-based Courses Using DEAL Model Role of AICTE-IDEA Lab in Experiential Learning and Acquisition of Multidisciplinary Skills for Execution of Undergraduate Projects Fostering Higher-Order Thinking: Pedagogical Strategies in Engineering Education A Comprehensive Analysis on Effectiveness of Parameters in NIRF India Rankings 2023 for Top 100 Engineering Institutes Peer Learning and Research Culture Within Student Organizations in Engineering: Students' Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1