A Critical Analysis of Various Evaluation Models: Step Towards Education 4.0

Dr. Ruhi Bakhare, Mr. Upal Sinha
{"title":"A Critical Analysis of Various Evaluation Models: Step Towards Education 4.0","authors":"Dr. Ruhi Bakhare, Mr. Upal Sinha","doi":"10.16920/jeet/2024/v38i1/24176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The purpose of this study is to propose an innovative model for evaluating the various higher education programs keeping in mind the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Since independence, there has been incredible growth in the landscape of higher education. According to the recent statistics from about 20 universities in 1950, there are now about 1040 universities. About 135 of these institutions are regarded as Institutions of National Importance (INI). From these figures, it is seen that the number of education universities and enrollment has geared up which has also given rise to the concern for quality and relevance of the education imparted. The quality of education and its relevance can be judged from the assessment and evaluation patterns. According to the New Education Policy 2020, Higher education is treated as a program as it is intended not only to impart knowledge it is also to develop certain associated skills thereby inculcating a specific type of attitude. Therefore, they should be looked at and evaluated as a training program. There are various models which are proposed by various researchers and trainers in different eras. This research paper intends to study these models in detail and tries to propose a new evaluation model which will be a step toward Education 4.0. Keywords: NEP 2020; Higher Education; Evaluation models and Education 4.0","PeriodicalId":52197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education Transformations","volume":"95 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education Transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v38i1/24176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to propose an innovative model for evaluating the various higher education programs keeping in mind the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Since independence, there has been incredible growth in the landscape of higher education. According to the recent statistics from about 20 universities in 1950, there are now about 1040 universities. About 135 of these institutions are regarded as Institutions of National Importance (INI). From these figures, it is seen that the number of education universities and enrollment has geared up which has also given rise to the concern for quality and relevance of the education imparted. The quality of education and its relevance can be judged from the assessment and evaluation patterns. According to the New Education Policy 2020, Higher education is treated as a program as it is intended not only to impart knowledge it is also to develop certain associated skills thereby inculcating a specific type of attitude. Therefore, they should be looked at and evaluated as a training program. There are various models which are proposed by various researchers and trainers in different eras. This research paper intends to study these models in detail and tries to propose a new evaluation model which will be a step toward Education 4.0. Keywords: NEP 2020; Higher Education; Evaluation models and Education 4.0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对各种评价模式的批判性分析:迈向教育 4.0
摘要:本研究的目的是根据《2020 年国家教育政策》(NEP),提出一种评估各种高等教育项目的创新模式。自独立以来,高等教育的发展速度令人难以置信。根据最近的统计数据,1950 年约有 20 所大学,而现在约有 1040 所大学。其中约 135 所院校被视为国家重点院校 (INI)。从这些数字中可以看出,大学数量和入学人数都在增加,这也引起了人们对教育质量和教育相关性的关注。教育质量及其相关性可以通过评估和评价模式来判断。根据《2020 年新教育政策》,高等教育被视为一项计划,因为它不仅旨在传授知识,还旨在培养某些相关技能,从而灌输一种特定的态度。因此,应将高等教育作为一项培训计划来看待和评估。不同时代的研究人员和培训人员提出了各种模式。本研究论文旨在详细研究这些模式,并尝试提出一种新的评估模式,这将是迈向教育 4.0 的一步。关键词国家教育计划 2020;高等教育;评估模式和教育 4.0
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
期刊最新文献
Problem-Based Learning for Critical Reflections on Skill-based Courses Using DEAL Model Role of AICTE-IDEA Lab in Experiential Learning and Acquisition of Multidisciplinary Skills for Execution of Undergraduate Projects Fostering Higher-Order Thinking: Pedagogical Strategies in Engineering Education A Comprehensive Analysis on Effectiveness of Parameters in NIRF India Rankings 2023 for Top 100 Engineering Institutes Peer Learning and Research Culture Within Student Organizations in Engineering: Students' Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1