Enhancing transportation accessibility: evaluating the impact of route guidance systems and connected autonomous vehicles

Hamid Mirzahossein , Pooyan Najafi
{"title":"Enhancing transportation accessibility: evaluating the impact of route guidance systems and connected autonomous vehicles","authors":"Hamid Mirzahossein ,&nbsp;Pooyan Najafi","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enhancing accessibility in transportation systems is an escalating interest among researchers, fueled by the rising issues with traffic congestion and technological innovations. Accessibility significantly contributes to improving the quality of life, thereby necessitating an examination of how route guidance systems impact it. This study explores the influence of system optimum (SO) and user equilibrium (UE) route guidance systems on accessibility, particularly in the context of connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) embedded in the network. We employ a hybrid assignment model that enables the concurrent allocation of SO and UE assignments, along with the Gravity model to compute accessibility. The Sioux Falls network, previously leveraged in prior research, was chosen for numerical simulations to permit insightful comparisons. Our study scrutinizes three scenarios: the first scenario examines the repercussions of route guidance systems on human-driven vehicles, while the second and third assess their effects on CAVs. The difference between the second and third scenario is in the way of increasing the capacity in the assignment. Our findings reveal that at lower penetration rates of route guidance systems, accessibility initially dips, and then ascends. When all human-driven users adopt route guidance systems, accessibility increases by 12.75% compared to the initial state (without any intervention). Remarkably, should all users employ autonomous vehicles, accessibility would surge by 220% compared to the initial state (without any intervention). These insights highlight the importance of integrating CAVs and route guidance systems into transportation planning to enhance accessibility and improve the quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224001581/pdfft?md5=bac508bdf68514cd0e86ebfd7eda6a5a&pid=1-s2.0-S2590198224001581-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224001581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing accessibility in transportation systems is an escalating interest among researchers, fueled by the rising issues with traffic congestion and technological innovations. Accessibility significantly contributes to improving the quality of life, thereby necessitating an examination of how route guidance systems impact it. This study explores the influence of system optimum (SO) and user equilibrium (UE) route guidance systems on accessibility, particularly in the context of connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) embedded in the network. We employ a hybrid assignment model that enables the concurrent allocation of SO and UE assignments, along with the Gravity model to compute accessibility. The Sioux Falls network, previously leveraged in prior research, was chosen for numerical simulations to permit insightful comparisons. Our study scrutinizes three scenarios: the first scenario examines the repercussions of route guidance systems on human-driven vehicles, while the second and third assess their effects on CAVs. The difference between the second and third scenario is in the way of increasing the capacity in the assignment. Our findings reveal that at lower penetration rates of route guidance systems, accessibility initially dips, and then ascends. When all human-driven users adopt route guidance systems, accessibility increases by 12.75% compared to the initial state (without any intervention). Remarkably, should all users employ autonomous vehicles, accessibility would surge by 220% compared to the initial state (without any intervention). These insights highlight the importance of integrating CAVs and route guidance systems into transportation planning to enhance accessibility and improve the quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高交通无障碍程度:评估路线引导系统和联网自动驾驶汽车的影响
由于交通拥堵和技术创新问题日益突出,提高交通系统的无障碍性成为研究人员日益关注的问题。无障碍环境对提高生活质量大有裨益,因此有必要研究路线引导系统如何影响无障碍环境。本研究探讨了系统最优(SO)和用户均衡(UE)路线引导系统对可达性的影响,尤其是在联网自动驾驶汽车(CAV)嵌入网络的情况下。我们采用了一种混合分配模式,能够同时分配 SO 和 UE 任务,并利用重力模式计算可达性。我们选择了之前研究中使用过的苏福尔斯网络进行数值模拟,以便进行深入比较。我们的研究仔细研究了三种情况:第一种情况是研究路线引导系统对人类驾驶车辆的影响,第二和第三种情况是评估其对 CAV 的影响。第二种和第三种方案的区别在于如何增加分配的容量。我们的研究结果表明,在路线引导系统普及率较低的情况下,可达性最初会下降,然后上升。当所有由人类驱动的用户都采用路线引导系统时,与初始状态(没有任何干预)相比,可达性提高了 12.75%。值得注意的是,如果所有用户都使用自动驾驶汽车,那么可达性将比初始状态(无任何干预)激增 220%。这些见解凸显了将自动驾驶汽车和路线引导系统整合到交通规划中的重要性,从而提高无障碍性并改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1