Practitioner views on transport planning's evolution – A Sisyphean task still ahead?

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.07.015
Daniela Paddeu, Glenn Lyons, Kiron Chatterjee, Thomas Calvert
{"title":"Practitioner views on transport planning's evolution – A Sisyphean task still ahead?","authors":"Daniela Paddeu,&nbsp;Glenn Lyons,&nbsp;Kiron Chatterjee,&nbsp;Thomas Calvert","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transport planning as a formalised profession is relatively young and there is no doubt it has evolved over time. In Europe, Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans reflect a change in emphasis from keeping traffic moving to place-based, people-centric planning. Three new developments of significance present themselves to contemporary transport planning: the collision and merging of the digital age with the motor age; a widespread sense of deep (and possibly deepening) uncertainty about the future; and the imperative to address the climate emergency and decarbonise transport. Taken together, such developments are reflected in the recent notion of Triple Access Planning which sits within a so-called ‘decide and provide’ paradigm – contrasted with traditional transport planning within the ‘predict and provide’ paradigm.</p><p>The world is changing significantly with a strong sense that transport planning needs to change accordingly. This paper draws upon the ‘7 Questions Interview’ technique to explore with 23 practitioners in the UK their experience of transport planning practice over time, their hopes and fears for its future and what could be achieved, and their views on enablers of, and barriers to, positive change.</p><p>The interviews reveal a strong sense that transport planning can face a Sisyphean (seemingly impossible) task of advocating measures that could push towards realisation of economic, social and environmental aspirations, only to find progress with measure approval and implementation thwarted by perennial challenges including lack of political will and public buy-in. While the three new developments mentioned represent potential catalysts for significant change, such change relies on multiple other factors. These include collaborative cross-sector working, a long-term perspective, appropriate funding and political agency, and enhanced communication skills to win hearts and minds. The paper concludes that Sisyphus may continue to struggle to push the transport planning boulder to the top of the hill; unless perhaps Hercules can lend a hand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"156 ","pages":"Pages 89-100"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24002117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transport planning as a formalised profession is relatively young and there is no doubt it has evolved over time. In Europe, Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans reflect a change in emphasis from keeping traffic moving to place-based, people-centric planning. Three new developments of significance present themselves to contemporary transport planning: the collision and merging of the digital age with the motor age; a widespread sense of deep (and possibly deepening) uncertainty about the future; and the imperative to address the climate emergency and decarbonise transport. Taken together, such developments are reflected in the recent notion of Triple Access Planning which sits within a so-called ‘decide and provide’ paradigm – contrasted with traditional transport planning within the ‘predict and provide’ paradigm.

The world is changing significantly with a strong sense that transport planning needs to change accordingly. This paper draws upon the ‘7 Questions Interview’ technique to explore with 23 practitioners in the UK their experience of transport planning practice over time, their hopes and fears for its future and what could be achieved, and their views on enablers of, and barriers to, positive change.

The interviews reveal a strong sense that transport planning can face a Sisyphean (seemingly impossible) task of advocating measures that could push towards realisation of economic, social and environmental aspirations, only to find progress with measure approval and implementation thwarted by perennial challenges including lack of political will and public buy-in. While the three new developments mentioned represent potential catalysts for significant change, such change relies on multiple other factors. These include collaborative cross-sector working, a long-term perspective, appropriate funding and political agency, and enhanced communication skills to win hearts and minds. The paper concludes that Sisyphus may continue to struggle to push the transport planning boulder to the top of the hill; unless perhaps Hercules can lend a hand.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从业人员对交通规划演变的看法--艰巨任务仍在前方?
交通规划作为一个正式的职业相对较新,毫无疑问,它随着时间的推移而不断发展。在欧洲,"可持续城市交通规划 "反映出规划重点已从保持交通畅通转变为以人为本的地方规划。当代交通规划有三个重要的新发展:数字时代与汽车时代的碰撞与融合;对未来的不确定性的普遍感觉(可能还会加深);以及应对气候紧急情况和实现交通去碳化的必要性。总之,这些发展反映在最近提出的三重交通规划概念中,即所谓的 "决定和提供 "范式,与传统的 "预测和提供 "范式的交通规划形成对比。本文利用 "七问访谈 "技术,与英国的 23 位交通规划从业者探讨了他们长期以来的交通规划实践经验、他们对交通规划未来的希望和担忧、可以实现的目标,以及他们对积极变革的推动因素和障碍的看法。访谈显示,人们强烈地意识到,交通规划可能面临着一项西西弗斯式(看似不可能完成的)任务,即倡导能够推动实现经济、社会和环境愿望的措施,但却发现措施的批准和实施进展因缺乏政治意愿和公众支持等长期挑战而受挫。虽然上述三项新进展可能会推动重大变革,但这种变革还有赖于其他多种因素。这些因素包括跨部门合作、长远眼光、适当的资金和政治机构,以及提高沟通技巧以赢得民心。本文的结论是,西西弗斯可能仍然难以将交通规划这块巨石推到山顶;除非大力士能够伸出援手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
A model for speed and fuel refueling strategy of methanol dual-fuel liners with emission control areas Editorial Board Flight, aircraft, and crew integrated recovery policies for airlines - A deep reinforcement learning approach Impacts of negative congestion experiences on acceptance of tradable credits schemes: Integration of NAM and TPB Hub port location and routing for a single-hub feeder network: Effect of liner shipping network connectivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1