Households’ access and expenditure on water services: Examining intra-urban differences in the Accra metropolis, Ghana

Louis Kusi Frimpong , Stephen Leonard Mensah , Austin Dziwornu Ablo
{"title":"Households’ access and expenditure on water services: Examining intra-urban differences in the Accra metropolis, Ghana","authors":"Louis Kusi Frimpong ,&nbsp;Stephen Leonard Mensah ,&nbsp;Austin Dziwornu Ablo","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite years of investment into the water sector in Ghana, access to and expenditure on potable water for drinking and domestic use remain a challenge for most urban households. However, within the urban context, the severity of water challenges varies from one residential community to another, with less research attention often given to such intra-urban differences. To address this gap, this study examines differences in household access and expenditure on pipe-borne water in three varying socio-economic residential communities in Accra. The study used a convergent mixed method design and drew on secondary literature, to examine the differences in households' access to and expenditure on water. The findings revealed that Jamestown, a low-income residential community, had the lowest connection to the Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) grid, with many respondents depending on pipe-borne water outside dwellings operated by private water retailers. While the findings showed no significant differences in the regularity of flow and expenditure on water among the three varying socio-economic communities, the paper argues that low-income communities such as Jamestown are likely to be more affected due to existing socio-economic deprivation and vulnerability contexts. Based on the study findings, we recommend that efforts be made to increase investment in water infrastructure to enable households to connect to the GWCL grid. Attention should also be given to low-income households, who often lack the means to pay for services that will enable them to connect to the GWCL grid. Further, we recommend improved collaboration between local communities and GWCL as a way of fostering strategies that address the peculiar water challenges in local communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 222-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite years of investment into the water sector in Ghana, access to and expenditure on potable water for drinking and domestic use remain a challenge for most urban households. However, within the urban context, the severity of water challenges varies from one residential community to another, with less research attention often given to such intra-urban differences. To address this gap, this study examines differences in household access and expenditure on pipe-borne water in three varying socio-economic residential communities in Accra. The study used a convergent mixed method design and drew on secondary literature, to examine the differences in households' access to and expenditure on water. The findings revealed that Jamestown, a low-income residential community, had the lowest connection to the Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) grid, with many respondents depending on pipe-borne water outside dwellings operated by private water retailers. While the findings showed no significant differences in the regularity of flow and expenditure on water among the three varying socio-economic communities, the paper argues that low-income communities such as Jamestown are likely to be more affected due to existing socio-economic deprivation and vulnerability contexts. Based on the study findings, we recommend that efforts be made to increase investment in water infrastructure to enable households to connect to the GWCL grid. Attention should also be given to low-income households, who often lack the means to pay for services that will enable them to connect to the GWCL grid. Further, we recommend improved collaboration between local communities and GWCL as a way of fostering strategies that address the peculiar water challenges in local communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭获得供水服务的机会和支出:考察加纳阿克拉大都市城市内部的差异
尽管多年来加纳对供水部门进行了投资,但对于大多数城市家庭来说,获取饮用水和家庭用水及其支出仍然是一项挑战。然而,在城市环境中,不同居民社区面临的用水挑战的严重程度也不尽相同,而研究人员往往较少关注城市内部的这种差异。为了弥补这一不足,本研究考察了阿克拉三个不同社会经济条件的居民社区在家庭使用自来水和自来水支出方面的差异。本研究采用了聚合混合方法设计,并借鉴了二手文献,以考察家庭在用水和用水支出方面的差异。研究结果表明,低收入住宅社区詹姆斯敦与加纳自来水有限公司(GWCL)电网的连接程度最低,许多受访者依靠私营自来水零售商在住宅外提供的自来水。虽然研究结果表明,三个不同社会经济社区在水流量和水费支出的规律性方面没有明显差异,但本文认为,由于现有的社会经济贫困和脆弱性背景,詹姆斯敦等低收入社区受到的影响可能更大。根据研究结果,我们建议努力增加对供水基础设施的投资,使家庭能够连接到 GWCL 电网。还应关注低收入家庭,因为他们往往没有能力支付服务费用,而这些服务将使他们能够连接到 GWCL 电网。此外,我们建议改善当地社区与 GWCL 之间的合作,以此促进制定战略,解决当地社区面临的特殊用水挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Households’ access and expenditure on water services: Examining intra-urban differences in the Accra metropolis, Ghana Reimagining cities as self-organising capital creating ecosystems Urban resilience: Multidimensional perspectives, challenges and prospects for future research Looking into urban toponymic verticality: An initial note Tracking the adoption of sustainable trash disposal practices: Evidence from Benin’s waste management amid urbanization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1