Fields of Residual Stresses near Open Assemblage Holes of Aircraft Wing Panel

IF 0.9 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Inorganic Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1134/s0020168524700298
S. I. Eleonsky, M. D. Zaitsev, Yu. G. Matvienko, V. S. Pisarev
{"title":"Fields of Residual Stresses near Open Assemblage Holes of Aircraft Wing Panel","authors":"S. I. Eleonsky, M. D. Zaitsev, Yu. G. Matvienko, V. S. Pisarev","doi":"10.1134/s0020168524700298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The results of fatigue tests of two geometrically identical and similar in design models of the lower wing panel of a commercial aircraft were analyzed. The panels differed in the way of installing mounting bolts, which connect the skin and stringers. Cold expansion of holes drilled both in the skin and stringer was performed for the first panel before joining. The second panel included no additional treatment after drilling pilot holes and final reaming. The bolts were mounted with an interference fit varying from 1.3 to 2.1% and from 2.9 to 3.2% for the first and the second panel, respectively. Changes in the interference fit were the consequence of a scatter attributed to the presence of a tolerance zone for the diameters of both bolts and mounting holes. A two-step comparison of both technologies was based on the experimental study of residual stress fields. The first stage, being a subject of the present study, included the analysis of residual stress fields arising after removal of the bolts and separation of the skin from stringers. Hole drilling and gradual crack growth were used to determine the components of residual stresses. The deformation response was measured by electronic speckle pattern interferometry. High quality interferograms, which provided a reliable resolution of the interference fringes of ultimate density over the hole edge or directly along the notch borders, were obtained for both ways of local removal of the material. The first (pointwise) method, based on drilling a probe hole, provided a quantitative determination of the residual stress components, starting from 1.4 mm distance from the assemblage hole edge. The second technique implements the crack compliance method of subsequent lengthening of the notch, starting directly from the mounting hole edge. This approach provided for a quantitative analysis of residual stress fields, related to different bolt mounting technologies, proceeding from the comparison of SIF values. A high level of compressive residual stresses near open holes was characteristic for both types of panels. Both experimental approaches showed the benefits of joints, where bolts are mounted into cold-expanded (reinforced) holes. For this case, the estimation of the relaxation parameters of the principal component of residual stresses in the direction of the external load is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":585,"journal":{"name":"Inorganic Materials","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inorganic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0020168524700298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of fatigue tests of two geometrically identical and similar in design models of the lower wing panel of a commercial aircraft were analyzed. The panels differed in the way of installing mounting bolts, which connect the skin and stringers. Cold expansion of holes drilled both in the skin and stringer was performed for the first panel before joining. The second panel included no additional treatment after drilling pilot holes and final reaming. The bolts were mounted with an interference fit varying from 1.3 to 2.1% and from 2.9 to 3.2% for the first and the second panel, respectively. Changes in the interference fit were the consequence of a scatter attributed to the presence of a tolerance zone for the diameters of both bolts and mounting holes. A two-step comparison of both technologies was based on the experimental study of residual stress fields. The first stage, being a subject of the present study, included the analysis of residual stress fields arising after removal of the bolts and separation of the skin from stringers. Hole drilling and gradual crack growth were used to determine the components of residual stresses. The deformation response was measured by electronic speckle pattern interferometry. High quality interferograms, which provided a reliable resolution of the interference fringes of ultimate density over the hole edge or directly along the notch borders, were obtained for both ways of local removal of the material. The first (pointwise) method, based on drilling a probe hole, provided a quantitative determination of the residual stress components, starting from 1.4 mm distance from the assemblage hole edge. The second technique implements the crack compliance method of subsequent lengthening of the notch, starting directly from the mounting hole edge. This approach provided for a quantitative analysis of residual stress fields, related to different bolt mounting technologies, proceeding from the comparison of SIF values. A high level of compressive residual stresses near open holes was characteristic for both types of panels. Both experimental approaches showed the benefits of joints, where bolts are mounted into cold-expanded (reinforced) holes. For this case, the estimation of the relaxation parameters of the principal component of residual stresses in the direction of the external load is presented.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞机机翼面板装配孔附近的残余应力场
摘要 分析了两架几何形状相同、设计相似的商用飞机下翼板模型的疲劳试验结果。这两种机翼面板在连接蒙皮和弦杆的安装螺栓方式上有所不同。第一块面板在连接前对蒙皮和弦杆上的钻孔进行了冷膨胀处理。第二块面板在钻孔和最后铰孔之后没有进行额外处理。安装螺栓时,第一块面板和第二块面板的过盈配合分别为 1.3%至 2.1%和 2.9%至 3.2%。过盈配合的变化是由于螺栓和安装孔的直径存在公差带而造成的。根据残余应力场的实验研究,对两种技术进行了两步比较。第一阶段是本研究的主题,包括分析螺栓拆除和蒙皮与弦杆分离后产生的残余应力场。采用钻孔和裂纹逐渐增长的方法来确定残余应力的成分。变形响应是通过电子斑点模式干涉仪测量的。两种局部去除材料的方法都能获得高质量的干涉图,对孔边缘或直接沿缺口边界的极限密度干涉条纹提供可靠的分辨率。第一种(点式)方法以钻探孔为基础,从距装配孔边缘 1.4 毫米处开始定量测定残余应力成分。第二种技术采用了裂纹顺应法,即直接从装配孔边缘开始,对缺口进行后续加长。这种方法通过比较 SIF 值,对与不同螺栓安装技术相关的残余应力场进行了定量分析。两种类型的面板在开孔附近都存在较高的压缩残余应力。两种实验方法都显示了将螺栓安装到冷膨胀(加固)孔中的接头的优点。针对这种情况,介绍了外部载荷方向残余应力主分量松弛参数的估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Inorganic Materials
Inorganic Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Inorganic Materials is a journal that publishes reviews and original articles devoted to chemistry, physics, and applications of various inorganic materials including high-purity substances and materials. The journal discusses phase equilibria, including P–T–X diagrams, and the fundamentals of inorganic materials science, which determines preparatory conditions for compounds of various compositions with specified deviations from stoichiometry. Inorganic Materials is a multidisciplinary journal covering all classes of inorganic materials. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the Durability of a Plate with a Through Crack Taking into Account Biaxial Constraints of Deformations along the Front of a Normal Rupture Crack Refined Method for Estimating the Interlayer Shear Modulus by Correcting the Deflection of Polymer Composite Specimens Fields of Residual Stresses near Open Assemblage Holes of Aircraft Wing Panel On the Features of Inhomogeneous Residual Stress Identification Using the Digital Speckle Interferometry and the Hole-Drilling Method Actual Problems of Creating Digital Twins of Machine Engineering Products in Terms of Durability Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1