The Reliability of Contraceptive Discontinuation Reporting in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Uganda.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Studies in Family Planning Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1111/sifp.12272
Dana Sarnak, Sophia Magalona, Phil Anglewicz
{"title":"The Reliability of Contraceptive Discontinuation Reporting in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Uganda.","authors":"Dana Sarnak, Sophia Magalona, Phil Anglewicz","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family planning researchers have been studying the discontinuation of contraception-the prevalence and reasons for it-for decades, as it has implications for contraceptive prevalence, total fertility, and unintended fertility. However little is known about the reliability of contraceptive discontinuation reporting: only two studies have examined the reliability of reported discontinuation in low-resource contexts. We use longitudinal and overlapping data from reproductive calendars to test the reliability of women's reporting of contraceptive discontinuation in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Uganda. We test whether recent discontinuations reported at baseline are reported one year later, and if the same reason for discontinuation is reported. Results reveal moderate reliability at the aggregate level of reporting of the index discontinuation; however, reliability is low when the timing of discontinuation is considered. There is variability across the reliability of reasons for discontinuation; discontinuation due to desired pregnancy is reported reliably while other reasons are less reliably reported. Our findings have important implications for the field, particularly in how the data are used and interpreted; we urge caution around event-level analyses of contraceptive discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation, given low reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family planning researchers have been studying the discontinuation of contraception-the prevalence and reasons for it-for decades, as it has implications for contraceptive prevalence, total fertility, and unintended fertility. However little is known about the reliability of contraceptive discontinuation reporting: only two studies have examined the reliability of reported discontinuation in low-resource contexts. We use longitudinal and overlapping data from reproductive calendars to test the reliability of women's reporting of contraceptive discontinuation in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Uganda. We test whether recent discontinuations reported at baseline are reported one year later, and if the same reason for discontinuation is reported. Results reveal moderate reliability at the aggregate level of reporting of the index discontinuation; however, reliability is low when the timing of discontinuation is considered. There is variability across the reliability of reasons for discontinuation; discontinuation due to desired pregnancy is reported reliably while other reasons are less reliably reported. Our findings have important implications for the field, particularly in how the data are used and interpreted; we urge caution around event-level analyses of contraceptive discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation, given low reliability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布基纳法索、肯尼亚和乌干达避孕药具停用报告的可靠性。
几十年来,计划生育研究人员一直在研究中止避孕的情况--其发生率和原因,因为这对避孕普及率、总生育率和意外生育率都有影响。然而,人们对避孕药具停用报告的可靠性知之甚少:只有两项研究考察了低资源环境下报告停用的可靠性。我们利用生殖日历的纵向重叠数据,检验了布基纳法索、肯尼亚和乌干达妇女报告停用避孕药具的可靠性。我们检验了基线时报告的近期停用情况是否在一年后报告,以及报告的停用原因是否相同。结果显示,在报告停药指数的总体水平上,可靠性适中;但如果考虑到停药时间,可靠性则较低。停药原因的可靠性存在差异;因预期怀孕而停药的报告可靠性较高,而其他原因的报告可靠性较低。我们的研究结果对该领域具有重要影响,尤其是在如何使用和解释数据方面;鉴于可靠性较低,我们敦促在对避孕药具停用和停用原因进行事件层面的分析时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
期刊最新文献
Searching for Needles in a Haystack: Exploring Alternative Operational Approaches to Classify the Safety of Induced Abortions Using Respondent-Driven Sampling Data From Two Sub-Saharan African Settings. Are Contraceptive Method Preferences Stable? Measuring Change in the Preferred Method among Kenyan Women. The Global Adolescent Fertility Decline is Counteracted by Increasing Teen Births in Sub-Saharan Africa. Assessing Trends in the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy: A Cautionary Note. Men's Willingness to Use and Preferences for Novel Male Contraceptive Methods in Malawi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1