Limitations to fungal diversity in forest soil during secondary succession

IF 5.4 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07473

James M. Doonan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bass Becking and Beijerinck theory of the microbial world that ‘everything is everywhere but the environment selects' has provided a basis to test microbial ecological theory for almost a century. Applying theory to the apparent chaos of the microbial world is arduous, and applying rules that guide our understanding is difficult. The Bass Becking and Beijerinck theory attempts to explain microbial community structure, i.e. why are certain microbes in a given environment? And why is a particular environment populated by certain microbes? Since the theory was advanced, limitations have been found. In particular, the advent of next-generation sequencing in the 2000s has amplified our ability to categorize and quantify the microbial world. Despite evident limitations demonstrating that the Bass Becking and Beijerinck theory is an oversimplification, it is perhaps the most unifying theory within microbial ecology.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

次生演替期间森林土壤中真菌多样性的局限性

近一个世纪以来，巴斯-贝金（Bass Becking）和贝耶林克（Beijerinck）关于微生物世界的理论 "万物无处不在，但环境会进行选择 "为检验微生物生态理论提供了依据。将理论应用于表面混乱的微生物世界是非常困难的，应用指导我们理解的规则也是困难的。巴斯-贝金（Bass Becking）和贝耶林克（Beijerinck）理论试图解释微生物群落结构，即为什么特定环境中会有某些微生物？为什么特定的环境中会有特定的微生物？自该理论提出以来，人们发现了其局限性。特别是 2000 年代下一代测序技术的出现，增强了我们对微生物世界进行分类和量化的能力。尽管巴斯-贝金和贝杰林克理论存在明显的局限性，表明该理论过于简单化，但它或许是微生物生态学中最具统一性的理论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Ecography 环境科学-生态学

CiteScore

11.60

自引率

3.40%

发文量

122

审稿时长

8-16 weeks

期刊介绍： ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.