{"title":"The Unidroit Principles and the Shari’ah Standards: any room for cooperation?","authors":"Badreddine Berrahlia","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents potential cooperation between the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Unidroit Principles) and the Shari’ah Standards (SSs) issued by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. It starts from the new trend that considers the contribution of soft law to resolving disputes in international commercial contracts: the 2015 Hague Principles, the 2019 Guide, and the 2023 African Principles. The article evaluates the SS-making process by using the input-process-output model and proposes a legal basis and scenarios for cooperation between the Unidroit Principles and the SSs in international commercial dispute resolutions. It then explores some divergences that limit the scope of this cooperation. The article recommends the publication of SSs concerned with invalidity and the three defects of consent: mistake, fraud, and threat. It also emphasizes the need to set up model clauses for Islamic finance cross-border contracts, including cooperation with the Unidroit Principles and publishing online case law.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents potential cooperation between the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Unidroit Principles) and the Shari’ah Standards (SSs) issued by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. It starts from the new trend that considers the contribution of soft law to resolving disputes in international commercial contracts: the 2015 Hague Principles, the 2019 Guide, and the 2023 African Principles. The article evaluates the SS-making process by using the input-process-output model and proposes a legal basis and scenarios for cooperation between the Unidroit Principles and the SSs in international commercial dispute resolutions. It then explores some divergences that limit the scope of this cooperation. The article recommends the publication of SSs concerned with invalidity and the three defects of consent: mistake, fraud, and threat. It also emphasizes the need to set up model clauses for Islamic finance cross-border contracts, including cooperation with the Unidroit Principles and publishing online case law.
本文介绍了《统法协会国际商事合同通则》(《统法协会通则》)与伊斯兰金融机构会计与审计组织(Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions)发布的伊斯兰教法标准(SSs)之间的潜在合作。文章从考虑软法律对解决国际商事合同纠纷的贡献的新趋势出发:2015 年《海牙原则》、2019 年《指南》和 2023 年《非洲原则》。文章利用投入-过程-产出模型评估了 SS 的制定过程,并提出了《统法协会通则》与 SS 在国际商事争议解决中合作的法律基础和方案。文章随后探讨了限制这种合作范围的一些分歧。文章建议公布与无效和同意的三个缺陷(错误、欺诈和威胁)有关的 SSs。文章还强调了为伊斯兰金融跨境合同制定示范条款的必要性,包括与《统法协会原则》合作和公布在线判例法。