The Unidroit Principles and the Shari’ah Standards: any room for cooperation?

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Uniform Law Review Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/ulr/unae033
Badreddine Berrahlia
{"title":"The Unidroit Principles and the Shari’ah Standards: any room for cooperation?","authors":"Badreddine Berrahlia","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents potential cooperation between the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Unidroit Principles) and the Shari’ah Standards (SSs) issued by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. It starts from the new trend that considers the contribution of soft law to resolving disputes in international commercial contracts: the 2015 Hague Principles, the 2019 Guide, and the 2023 African Principles. The article evaluates the SS-making process by using the input-process-output model and proposes a legal basis and scenarios for cooperation between the Unidroit Principles and the SSs in international commercial dispute resolutions. It then explores some divergences that limit the scope of this cooperation. The article recommends the publication of SSs concerned with invalidity and the three defects of consent: mistake, fraud, and threat. It also emphasizes the need to set up model clauses for Islamic finance cross-border contracts, including cooperation with the Unidroit Principles and publishing online case law.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents potential cooperation between the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Unidroit Principles) and the Shari’ah Standards (SSs) issued by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. It starts from the new trend that considers the contribution of soft law to resolving disputes in international commercial contracts: the 2015 Hague Principles, the 2019 Guide, and the 2023 African Principles. The article evaluates the SS-making process by using the input-process-output model and proposes a legal basis and scenarios for cooperation between the Unidroit Principles and the SSs in international commercial dispute resolutions. It then explores some divergences that limit the scope of this cooperation. The article recommends the publication of SSs concerned with invalidity and the three defects of consent: mistake, fraud, and threat. It also emphasizes the need to set up model clauses for Islamic finance cross-border contracts, including cooperation with the Unidroit Principles and publishing online case law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统法协会原则和伊斯兰教法标准:是否有合作空间?
本文介绍了《统法协会国际商事合同通则》(《统法协会通则》)与伊斯兰金融机构会计与审计组织(Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions)发布的伊斯兰教法标准(SSs)之间的潜在合作。文章从考虑软法律对解决国际商事合同纠纷的贡献的新趋势出发:2015 年《海牙原则》、2019 年《指南》和 2023 年《非洲原则》。文章利用投入-过程-产出模型评估了 SS 的制定过程,并提出了《统法协会通则》与 SS 在国际商事争议解决中合作的法律基础和方案。文章随后探讨了限制这种合作范围的一些分歧。文章建议公布与无效和同意的三个缺陷(错误、欺诈和威胁)有关的 SSs。文章还强调了为伊斯兰金融跨境合同制定示范条款的必要性,包括与《统法协会原则》合作和公布在线判例法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Interpretation and application of the CISG by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia: an analysis of the judgment in the Boom Conveyor case Electronic enforcement in the digital era: Themis without a sword The Unidroit Principles and the Shari’ah Standards: any room for cooperation? Dealing with registrations and jurisdiction in aircraft financing Revolutionizing trade finance: leveraging the power of blockchain and AI in electronic letters of credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1