The relationship between momentary experiential avoidance and anxiety symptoms.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2024.2383769
Kimberly S Sain, Kayla A Lord, Kelly A Knowles, Kate Everhardt, David F Tolin
{"title":"The relationship between momentary experiential avoidance and anxiety symptoms.","authors":"Kimberly S Sain, Kayla A Lord, Kelly A Knowles, Kate Everhardt, David F Tolin","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2024.2383769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Experiential avoidance (EA) may serve as a risk factor for a wide range of anxiety-related psychopathology. Anxiety is thought to trigger the use of EA, while also serving as a consequence of EA efforts. Previous ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies found that EA was associated with greater anxiety in nonclinical undergraduates and patients with social anxiety disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study examined the in-the-moment, bidirectional relationship between EA, perceived stress, and two facets of anxiety (autonomic arousal and worry/misery) in a sample of treatment-seeking patients broadly diagnosed with an anxiety-related disorder (<i>N </i>= 46). Participants completed a baseline assessment followed by an EMA assessment period (assessments three times daily for seven days). We hypothesized that there would be a bidirectional relationship between EA and anxiety/stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results largely supported a unidirectional relationship such that greater EA at one time point predicted higher stress at a later time point controlling for previous stress levels and linear time. Trend-level associations between EA and anxiety symptoms are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study provides important insight into the relationship between EA and anxiety symptoms in a clinical sample of participants with anxiety-related disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"193-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2383769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Experiential avoidance (EA) may serve as a risk factor for a wide range of anxiety-related psychopathology. Anxiety is thought to trigger the use of EA, while also serving as a consequence of EA efforts. Previous ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies found that EA was associated with greater anxiety in nonclinical undergraduates and patients with social anxiety disorder.

Methods: The present study examined the in-the-moment, bidirectional relationship between EA, perceived stress, and two facets of anxiety (autonomic arousal and worry/misery) in a sample of treatment-seeking patients broadly diagnosed with an anxiety-related disorder (N = 46). Participants completed a baseline assessment followed by an EMA assessment period (assessments three times daily for seven days). We hypothesized that there would be a bidirectional relationship between EA and anxiety/stress.

Results: Results largely supported a unidirectional relationship such that greater EA at one time point predicted higher stress at a later time point controlling for previous stress levels and linear time. Trend-level associations between EA and anxiety symptoms are discussed.

Conclusions: The current study provides important insight into the relationship between EA and anxiety symptoms in a clinical sample of participants with anxiety-related disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瞬间体验性回避与焦虑症状之间的关系。
背景:体验性回避(EA)可能是多种焦虑相关精神病理学的风险因素。焦虑被认为是使用体验回避的诱因,同时也是体验回避努力的结果。以往的生态瞬间评估(EMA)研究发现,EA 与非临床大学生和社交焦虑症患者的焦虑程度有关:本研究以被广泛诊断为焦虑相关障碍的寻求治疗的患者(46 人)为样本,研究了 EA、感知压力和焦虑的两个方面(自律神经唤醒和担忧/痛苦)之间的即时双向关系。参与者在完成基线评估后进行 EMA 评估(每天评估三次,持续七天)。我们假设 EA 与焦虑/压力之间存在双向关系:结果:研究结果在很大程度上支持单向关系,即在一个时间点上,如果 EA 值越大,则在随后的时间点上压力越大,这与之前的压力水平和线性时间有关。研究还讨论了 EA 与焦虑症状之间的趋势关联:本研究为焦虑相关障碍临床样本中的 EA 与焦虑症状之间的关系提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
期刊最新文献
Burnout, work-related daily negative affect and rumination: a mediation model combining an intensive and longitudinal design. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the aftermath of the Turkey earthquake: exploring the role of demographics, level of exposure, and personality traits. The relationship between momentary experiential avoidance and anxiety symptoms. Evidence that specific personal relationships help regulate depressive symptoms and related constructs among people with probable major depressive disorder. Reflection impulsivity in patients with panic disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1