Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Movement Disorders: Comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen in Parkinson's Disease and Lewy Body Dementia.

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2024-06-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/ADR-230207
Rónán O'Caoimh, Mary J Foley, Suzanne Timmons, D William Molloy
{"title":"Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Movement Disorders: Comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen in Parkinson's Disease and Lewy Body Dementia.","authors":"Rónán O'Caoimh, Mary J Foley, Suzanne Timmons, D William Molloy","doi":"10.3233/ADR-230207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is recommended by the Movement Disorder Society for cognitive testing in movement disorders including Parkinson's disease (PD) and lewy body dementia. Few studies have compared cognitive screening instruments in these diseases, which overlap clinically.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the MoCA and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q<i>mci)</i> screen in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients attending memory and movement disorder clinics associated with a university hospital had the MoCA and Q<i>mci</i> screen performed and diagnostic accuracy compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Duration and severity of movement disorders was assessed using the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 133 assessments were available, median age 74±5. Median education was 11±4 years and 65% were male. Median total UPDRS score was 37±26. Median Q<i>mci</i> screen was 51±27, median MoCA was 19±10. There were statistically significant differences in test scores between those with subjective symptoms but normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Q<i>mci</i> screen had significantly greater accuracy differentiating normal cognition from MCI versus the MoCA (AUC 0.90 versus 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Both instruments had similar accuracy in identifying cognitive impairment and separating MCI from dementia. The median administration time for the Q<i>mci</i> screen and MoCA were 5.19 and 9.24 minutes (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the MoCA and Q<i>mci</i> screen have good to excellent accuracy in a population with movement disorders experiencing cognitive symptoms. The Q<i>mci</i> screen was significantly more accurate for those with early symptoms and had a shorter administration time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"971-980"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-230207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is recommended by the Movement Disorder Society for cognitive testing in movement disorders including Parkinson's disease (PD) and lewy body dementia. Few studies have compared cognitive screening instruments in these diseases, which overlap clinically.

Objective: To compare the MoCA and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen in this population.

Methods: Patients attending memory and movement disorder clinics associated with a university hospital had the MoCA and Qmci screen performed and diagnostic accuracy compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Duration and severity of movement disorders was assessed using the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS).

Results: In total, 133 assessments were available, median age 74±5. Median education was 11±4 years and 65% were male. Median total UPDRS score was 37±26. Median Qmci screen was 51±27, median MoCA was 19±10. There were statistically significant differences in test scores between those with subjective symptoms but normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (p < 0.001). The Qmci screen had significantly greater accuracy differentiating normal cognition from MCI versus the MoCA (AUC 0.90 versus 0.72, p = 0.01). Both instruments had similar accuracy in identifying cognitive impairment and separating MCI from dementia. The median administration time for the Qmci screen and MoCA were 5.19 and 9.24 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: Both the MoCA and Qmci screen have good to excellent accuracy in a population with movement disorders experiencing cognitive symptoms. The Qmci screen was significantly more accurate for those with early symptoms and had a shorter administration time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动障碍认知障碍筛查:蒙特利尔认知评估与帕金森病和路易体痴呆症轻度认知障碍快速筛查的比较。
背景:蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA运动障碍协会推荐使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)对帕金森病(PD)和左旋体痴呆等运动障碍进行认知测试。很少有研究对这些疾病的认知筛查工具进行比较,而这些疾病在临床上有重叠:比较 MoCA 和轻度认知功能障碍快速筛查(Qmci)在这类人群中的应用:方法:在一家大学医院的记忆和运动障碍门诊就诊的患者接受了 MoCA 和 Qmci 筛查,并通过接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)对诊断准确性进行了比较。使用统一运动障碍评定量表(UPDRS)评估运动障碍的持续时间和严重程度:共有133人接受了评估,中位年龄为74±5岁。教育程度中位数为(11±4)年,65%为男性。UPDRS总分中位数为(37±26)分。Qmci筛查中位数为(51±27)分,MoCA中位数为(19±10)分。有主观症状但认知正常者、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆者的测试评分差异有统计学意义(p mci筛查区分认知正常和MCI的准确性明显高于MoCA(AUC为0.90对0.72,p = 0.01)。两种工具在识别认知障碍和区分 MCI 与痴呆症方面的准确性相似。Qmci筛查和MoCA的中位用药时间分别为5.19分钟和9.24分钟(p 结论:Qmci筛查和MoCA的中位用药时间均为5.19分钟:在出现认知症状的运动障碍患者中,MoCA 和 Qmci 筛查的准确性都很好甚至非常好。对于有早期症状的患者,Qmci 筛查的准确性明显更高,且筛查时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomarker Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies by the Immunomagnetic Reduction Assay and Clinical Measures. Cognitive Reserve Relationship with Physical Performance in Dementia-Free Older Adults: The MIND-China Study. Are Opioids Agitating? A Data Analysis of Baseline Data from the STAN Study. Cognitive Function After Stopping Folic Acid and DHA Intervention: An Extended Follow-Up Results from the Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Individualized and Biomarker-Based Prognosis of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1