Individualized and Biomarker-Based Prognosis of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/ADR-240049
Xiwu Wang, Teng Ye, Ziye Huang, Wenjun Zhou, Jie Zhang
{"title":"Individualized and Biomarker-Based Prognosis of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Xiwu Wang, Teng Ye, Ziye Huang, Wenjun Zhou, Jie Zhang","doi":"10.3233/ADR-240049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although individualized models using demographic, MRI, and biological markers have recently been applied in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a similar study is lacking for patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) with biomarker evidence of abnormal amyloid in the brain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to develop prognostic models for individualized prediction of cognitive change in early AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 421 individuals with early AD (MCI or mild dementia due to AD) having biomarker evidence of abnormal amyloid in the brain were included in the current study. The primary cognitive outcome was the slope of change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale-13 (ADAS-Cog-13) over a period of up to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A model combining demographics, baseline cognition, neurodegenerative markers, and CSF AD biomarkers provided the best predictive performance, achieving an overfitting-corrected R<sup>2</sup> of 0.59 (bootstrapping validation). A nomogram was created to enable clinicians or trialists to easily and visually estimate the individualized magnitude of cognitive change in the context of patient characteristics. Simulated clinical trials suggested that the inclusion of our nomogram into the enrichment strategy would lead to a substantial reduction of sample size in a trial of early AD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings may be of great clinical relevance to identify individuals with early AD who are likely to experience fast cognitive deterioration in clinical practice and in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"1301-1315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-240049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although individualized models using demographic, MRI, and biological markers have recently been applied in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a similar study is lacking for patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) with biomarker evidence of abnormal amyloid in the brain.

Objective: We aimed to develop prognostic models for individualized prediction of cognitive change in early AD.

Methods: A total of 421 individuals with early AD (MCI or mild dementia due to AD) having biomarker evidence of abnormal amyloid in the brain were included in the current study. The primary cognitive outcome was the slope of change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale-13 (ADAS-Cog-13) over a period of up to 5 years.

Results: A model combining demographics, baseline cognition, neurodegenerative markers, and CSF AD biomarkers provided the best predictive performance, achieving an overfitting-corrected R2 of 0.59 (bootstrapping validation). A nomogram was created to enable clinicians or trialists to easily and visually estimate the individualized magnitude of cognitive change in the context of patient characteristics. Simulated clinical trials suggested that the inclusion of our nomogram into the enrichment strategy would lead to a substantial reduction of sample size in a trial of early AD.

Conclusions: Our findings may be of great clinical relevance to identify individuals with early AD who are likely to experience fast cognitive deterioration in clinical practice and in clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于生物标志物的早期症状性阿尔茨海默病认知能力纵向衰退的个性化预后。
背景:尽管使用人口统计学、核磁共振成像和生物标志物的个体化模型最近已被应用于轻度认知障碍(MCI),但对于大脑中存在异常淀粉样蛋白生物标志物证据的早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者却缺乏类似的研究:我们的目的是建立预后模型,对早期阿尔茨海默病患者的认知变化进行个体化预测:本研究共纳入了421名大脑中存在异常淀粉样蛋白生物标志物证据的早期AD(AD导致的MCI或轻度痴呆)患者。主要认知结果是阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知分量表-13(ADAS-Cog-13)在长达5年时间内的变化斜率:结合人口统计学、基线认知、神经退行性标记物和 CSF 阿尔茨海默病生物标记物的模型具有最佳预测效果,过拟合校正 R2 为 0.59(自引导验证)。我们创建了一个提名图,使临床医生或试验人员能够根据患者特征轻松直观地估计认知变化的个体化程度。模拟临床试验表明,在早期AD试验中,将我们的提名图纳入富集策略将大大减少样本量:我们的研究结果对于在临床实践和临床试验中识别可能出现认知功能快速衰退的早期 AD 患者具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomarker Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies by the Immunomagnetic Reduction Assay and Clinical Measures. Cognitive Reserve Relationship with Physical Performance in Dementia-Free Older Adults: The MIND-China Study. Are Opioids Agitating? A Data Analysis of Baseline Data from the STAN Study. Cognitive Function After Stopping Folic Acid and DHA Intervention: An Extended Follow-Up Results from the Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Individualized and Biomarker-Based Prognosis of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1