Mentoring Experiences of New Nontenured Faculty in Undergraduate Nursing: A Qualitative Study.

Dione Sandiford, Shira Birnbaum, Charlotte Thomas-Hawkins
{"title":"Mentoring Experiences of New Nontenured Faculty in Undergraduate Nursing: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Dione Sandiford, Shira Birnbaum, Charlotte Thomas-Hawkins","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240503-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentoring is crucial for professional development and retention of newly hired nurse faculty, yet little is known about the actual mentoring experiences of clinical nurses in their first few years following transition into academic teaching.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 full-time nontenure-track faculty from 10 higher education institutions in seven states in the United States. All of the faculty were in the first 3 years of teaching in 4-year undergraduate nursing programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged: (1) chaotic work environments characterized by unpredictable workloads, absence of reliable support, and inconsistent access to information; (2) a de facto do-it-yourself system in which nurses pieced together their own support; (3) reliance on personal social networks; (4) yearning for real mentorship; and (5) future plans about staying in the role.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A gap exists between widely touted recommendations about mentoring and the reality of mentoring for newly hired nontenure-track faculty. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(8):525-532.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240503-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mentoring is crucial for professional development and retention of newly hired nurse faculty, yet little is known about the actual mentoring experiences of clinical nurses in their first few years following transition into academic teaching.

Method: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 full-time nontenure-track faculty from 10 higher education institutions in seven states in the United States. All of the faculty were in the first 3 years of teaching in 4-year undergraduate nursing programs.

Results: Five themes emerged: (1) chaotic work environments characterized by unpredictable workloads, absence of reliable support, and inconsistent access to information; (2) a de facto do-it-yourself system in which nurses pieced together their own support; (3) reliance on personal social networks; (4) yearning for real mentorship; and (5) future plans about staying in the role.

Conclusion: A gap exists between widely touted recommendations about mentoring and the reality of mentoring for newly hired nontenure-track faculty. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(8):525-532.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科护理学非终身制新教师的指导经验:定性研究。
背景:指导对于新聘护士教师的专业发展和留任至关重要,但人们对临床护士转入学术教学后最初几年的实际指导经历知之甚少:对来自美国 7 个州 10 所高等教育机构的 23 名全职非终身教职员工进行了个人半结构式访谈。所有教师都是在四年制本科护理专业任教的前三年:出现了五个主题:(1)工作环境混乱,其特点是工作量不可预测、缺乏可靠的支持以及获取信息的途径不一致;(2)事实上的 "自己动手 "系统,即护士自己拼凑支持;(3)依赖个人社交网络;(4)渴望真正的导师指导;以及(5)关于继续担任该角色的未来计划:结论:在广为宣传的指导建议与新聘用的非终身教职员工的指导现实之间存在差距。[护理教育杂志,2024;63(8):525-532]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fulbright as Opportunity for U.S. Nursing Educators and International Nursing Schools. Outcomes of Concept-Based Curricula: An Integrative Review. Meeting Quality Improvement Learning Outcomes: Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle. Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Student Cross-Specialty Procedural Training: Effective Collaboration and Student Experience. Engaging Nursing Students in Clinical Research Through a Unique Academic-Clinical Partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1