Accuracy and time efficiency of a novel deep learning algorithm for Intracranial Hemorrhage detection in CT Scans.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologia Medica Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s11547-024-01867-y
Tommaso D'Angelo, Giuseppe M Bucolo, Tarek Kamareddine, Ibrahim Yel, Vitali Koch, Leon D Gruenewald, Simon Martin, Leona S Alizadeh, Silvio Mazziotti, Alfredo Blandino, Thomas J Vogl, Christian Booz
{"title":"Accuracy and time efficiency of a novel deep learning algorithm for Intracranial Hemorrhage detection in CT Scans.","authors":"Tommaso D'Angelo, Giuseppe M Bucolo, Tarek Kamareddine, Ibrahim Yel, Vitali Koch, Leon D Gruenewald, Simon Martin, Leona S Alizadeh, Silvio Mazziotti, Alfredo Blandino, Thomas J Vogl, Christian Booz","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01867-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate a deep learning-based pipeline using a Dense-UNet architecture for the assessment of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) head scans after traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted using a prototype algorithm that evaluated 502 NCCT head scans with ICH in context of TBI. Four board-certified radiologists evaluated in consensus the CT scans to establish the standard of reference for hemorrhage presence and type of ICH. Consequently, all CT scans were independently analyzed by the algorithm and a board-certified radiologist to assess the presence and type of ICH. Additionally, the time to diagnosis was measured for both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 405/502 patients presented ICH classified in the following types: intraparenchymal (n = 172); intraventricular (n = 26); subarachnoid (n = 163); subdural (n = 178); and epidural (n = 15). The algorithm showed high diagnostic accuracy (91.24%) for the assessment of ICH with a sensitivity of 90.37% and specificity of 94.85%. To distinguish the different ICH types, the algorithm had a sensitivity of 93.47% and a specificity of 99.79%, with an accuracy of 98.54%. To detect midline shift, the algorithm had a sensitivity of 100%. In terms of processing time, the algorithm was significantly faster compared to the radiologist's time to first diagnosis (15.37 ± 1.85 vs 277 ± 14 s, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A novel deep learning algorithm can provide high diagnostic accuracy for the identification and classification of ICH from unenhanced CT scans, combined with short processing times. This has the potential to assist and improve radiologists' ICH assessment in NCCT scans, especially in emergency scenarios, when time efficiency is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":"1499-1506"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01867-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate a deep learning-based pipeline using a Dense-UNet architecture for the assessment of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) head scans after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study was conducted using a prototype algorithm that evaluated 502 NCCT head scans with ICH in context of TBI. Four board-certified radiologists evaluated in consensus the CT scans to establish the standard of reference for hemorrhage presence and type of ICH. Consequently, all CT scans were independently analyzed by the algorithm and a board-certified radiologist to assess the presence and type of ICH. Additionally, the time to diagnosis was measured for both methods.

Results: A total of 405/502 patients presented ICH classified in the following types: intraparenchymal (n = 172); intraventricular (n = 26); subarachnoid (n = 163); subdural (n = 178); and epidural (n = 15). The algorithm showed high diagnostic accuracy (91.24%) for the assessment of ICH with a sensitivity of 90.37% and specificity of 94.85%. To distinguish the different ICH types, the algorithm had a sensitivity of 93.47% and a specificity of 99.79%, with an accuracy of 98.54%. To detect midline shift, the algorithm had a sensitivity of 100%. In terms of processing time, the algorithm was significantly faster compared to the radiologist's time to first diagnosis (15.37 ± 1.85 vs 277 ± 14 s, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A novel deep learning algorithm can provide high diagnostic accuracy for the identification and classification of ICH from unenhanced CT scans, combined with short processing times. This has the potential to assist and improve radiologists' ICH assessment in NCCT scans, especially in emergency scenarios, when time efficiency is needed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于 CT 扫描颅内出血检测的新型深度学习算法的准确性和时间效率。
目的:评估一种基于深度学习的管道,该管道采用 Dense-UNet 架构,用于评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)头部扫描中的急性颅内出血(ICH):这项回顾性研究采用一种原型算法,评估了 502 例创伤性脑损伤后有 ICH 的 NCCT 头部扫描结果。四位经委员会认证的放射科专家对 CT 扫描进行了一致评估,以确定出血存在和 ICH 类型的参考标准。因此,所有 CT 扫描均由该算法和一名经委员会认证的放射科医生进行独立分析,以评估是否存在 ICH 及其类型。此外,两种方法都对诊断时间进行了测量:共有 405/502 例患者出现了 ICH,分为以下类型:实质内(n = 172);脑室内(n = 26);蛛网膜下腔(n = 163);硬膜下(n = 178);硬膜外(n = 15)。该算法评估 ICH 的诊断准确率很高(91.24%),灵敏度为 90.37%,特异度为 94.85%。在区分不同类型的 ICH 时,该算法的灵敏度为 93.47%,特异度为 99.79%,准确率为 98.54%。在检测中线移位方面,该算法的灵敏度为 100%。在处理时间方面,该算法明显快于放射科医生的首次诊断时间(15.37 ± 1.85 vs 277 ± 14 s,p 结论:新颖的深度学习算法可在较短的处理时间内,从未增强 CT 扫描中对 ICH 进行高诊断准确性的识别和分类。这有可能帮助并改善放射科医生对 NCCT 扫描中的 ICH 评估,尤其是在需要提高时间效率的紧急情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
期刊最新文献
A CT-based deep learning for segmenting tumors and predicting microsatellite instability in patients with colorectal cancers: a multicenter cohort study. Nodal assessment and extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell cancer: insights from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Radiomics based on brain-to-tumor interface enables prediction of metastatic tumor type of brain metastasis: a proof-of-concept study. Impact of body fat composition on liver iron overload severity in hemochromatosis: a retrospective MRI analysis. A multi-center, multi-organ, multi-omic prediction model for treatment-induced severe oral mucositis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1