Impact of preoperative back pain severity on PROMIS outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08275-w
Fatima N Anwar, Andrea M Roca, Ishan Khosla, Alexandra C Loya, Srinath S Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C Wolf, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh
{"title":"Impact of preoperative back pain severity on PROMIS outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression.","authors":"Fatima N Anwar, Andrea M Roca, Ishan Khosla, Alexandra C Loya, Srinath S Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C Wolf, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08275-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of baseline back pain severity on PROMIS mental health outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (LD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing elective, primary, single-level LD were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective single spine surgeon registry. Perioperative characteristics, demographics, and the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were extracted: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/Patient-Health Questionnaire-9 /PROMIS-Physical Function/Anxiety/Pain Interference/Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-PF/A/PI/SD). Two cohorts were created: preoperative VAS-B < 7 and VAS-B ≥ 7. Change in PROs (ΔPROs) from baseline to six weeks/final follow-up were determined. Average patient follow-up was 13.4 ± 8.8 months. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were calculated and compared through multivariable logistic regression. Postoperative scores and ΔPROs, were compared with multivariable linear regression while all other data was compared between groups with inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 347 patients were included, with 190 in the VAS-B < 7 group. VAS-B ≥ 7 reported worse outcomes preoperatively (p ≤ 0.013, all). At six weeks, VAS-B ≥ 7 reported worse VAS-B (p = 0.017), with no other significant differences. At final follow-up, patients with worse VAS-B reported worse ODI (p = 0.040) and VAS-B while all other PROs were similar (p ≥ 0.078, all). VAS-B ≥ 7 experienced greater 6-week improvements in VAS-B/ODI/PROMIS-PI/PROMIS-SD (p ≤ 0.009, all), greater VAS-B/ODI/PROMIS-SD improvement by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.009, all) and greater MCID achievement in ODI/VAS-B (p ≤ 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with worse baseline back pain report inferior baseline scores that converge with those with milder preoperative back pain by 6 weeks after LD and reported greater 6-week improvements in disability, pain interference, and sleep disturbance by 6 weeks, and greater improvements in disability and sleep disturbance by final follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4262-4269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08275-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of baseline back pain severity on PROMIS mental health outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (LD).

Methods: Patients undergoing elective, primary, single-level LD were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective single spine surgeon registry. Perioperative characteristics, demographics, and the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were extracted: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/Patient-Health Questionnaire-9 /PROMIS-Physical Function/Anxiety/Pain Interference/Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-PF/A/PI/SD). Two cohorts were created: preoperative VAS-B < 7 and VAS-B ≥ 7. Change in PROs (ΔPROs) from baseline to six weeks/final follow-up were determined. Average patient follow-up was 13.4 ± 8.8 months. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were calculated and compared through multivariable logistic regression. Postoperative scores and ΔPROs, were compared with multivariable linear regression while all other data was compared between groups with inferential statistics.

Results: Altogether, 347 patients were included, with 190 in the VAS-B < 7 group. VAS-B ≥ 7 reported worse outcomes preoperatively (p ≤ 0.013, all). At six weeks, VAS-B ≥ 7 reported worse VAS-B (p = 0.017), with no other significant differences. At final follow-up, patients with worse VAS-B reported worse ODI (p = 0.040) and VAS-B while all other PROs were similar (p ≥ 0.078, all). VAS-B ≥ 7 experienced greater 6-week improvements in VAS-B/ODI/PROMIS-PI/PROMIS-SD (p ≤ 0.009, all), greater VAS-B/ODI/PROMIS-SD improvement by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.009, all) and greater MCID achievement in ODI/VAS-B (p ≤ 0.027).

Conclusion: Patients with worse baseline back pain report inferior baseline scores that converge with those with milder preoperative back pain by 6 weeks after LD and reported greater 6-week improvements in disability, pain interference, and sleep disturbance by 6 weeks, and greater improvements in disability and sleep disturbance by final follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创腰椎减压术后,术前腰痛严重程度对 PROMIS 结果的影响。
目的:评估微创腰椎减压术(LD)后基线背痛严重程度对 PROMIS 心理健康结果的影响:方法:对接受择期、初级、单水平腰椎减压术的患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者来自前瞻性的单脊柱外科医生登记处。提取了围手术期特征、人口统计学和以下患者报告结果(PROs):Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)/患者健康问卷-9/PROMIS-物理功能/焦虑/疼痛干扰/睡眠障碍(PROMIS-PF/A/PI/SD)。创建了两个队列:术前 VAS-B 结果:共纳入 347 名患者,其中 190 名患者接受了 VAS-B 评估 结论:基线背痛较重的患者在 LD 6 周后报告的基线评分较低,与术前背痛较轻的患者的基线评分趋同,并且在 6 周后报告的残疾、疼痛干扰和睡眠障碍改善程度更大,在最终随访时报告的残疾和睡眠障碍改善程度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Comparison of fusion rate, radiologic and clinical outcome between CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 bioactive glass-ceramics 7 (BGS-7) spacer and allograft spacer with iliac bone graft in multilevel ACDF. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and establishment of the minimal clinicallyimportant change score of the European Portuguese Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with cervical degenerative spine disease. Effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty combined with percutaneous microwave ablation on pain and clinical outcome in patients with spinal metastases. Letter to the editor concerning "association between skin ultrasound parameters and revision surgery after posterior spinal fusion" by E. Chiapparelli, et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08319-1). Assessing bone quality in hounsfield units using computed tomography: what value should be used to classify bone as normal or osteoporotic?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1