Spinous process resistance to different materials and looping techniques for interspinous lumbar vertebropexy.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08724-0
Jonas Widmer, Anna-Katharina Calek, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mauro Suter, Brian Allen, Mazda Farshad
{"title":"Spinous process resistance to different materials and looping techniques for interspinous lumbar vertebropexy.","authors":"Jonas Widmer, Anna-Katharina Calek, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mauro Suter, Brian Allen, Mazda Farshad","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08724-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Semi-rigid spinal stabilization has been explored as an alternative to spinal fusion, and early experience with spinal segment augementation (\"vertebropexy\") is promising. The main technical challenge is to maintain the integrity of the spinous processes during loading. This study aimed to compare different looping materials and techniques with respect to their performance in maintaining spinous process integrity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and five thoracolumbar vertebrae were tested with various looping materials and techniques; the \"Tunnel-only\" double-loop technique was tested with a synthetic tape (FiberTape<sup>®</sup>), bovine tendon, and a hybrid tape option. Additionally, the performance of the synthetic tape was tested for other augmentation techniques such as the \"Figure-of-eight\" looping technique, a double-loop combination of tunneling and cortical wrapping, and a double-loop with \"Cortical wrapping only\". Biomechanical testing was performed by uniaxial caudo-cranial distraction to failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The loads required to cause spinous process failure were lowest with the synthetic tape, followed by tendon and hybrid constructs by tendency (419 N vs. 487 N vs. 519 N) in the \"Tunnel-only\" double-loop technique. The comparison showed that the \"Tunnel + cortical wrapping\" technique required significantly higher forces to induce failure compared to other techniques, particularly the \"Tunnel only\" method (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of the looping technique and material in lumbar interspinous vertebropexy significantly affects the resistance of the spinous process to load. Techniques that incorporate cortical bone and use tendinous material demonstrate superior resistance to higher forces, compared to methods that involve passing synthetic tape through a hole solely within trabecular bone. Additionally, the role of trabecular bone density in the spinous process is relatively minor when cortical bone is utilized as an abutment for the loop.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1480-1487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08724-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Semi-rigid spinal stabilization has been explored as an alternative to spinal fusion, and early experience with spinal segment augementation ("vertebropexy") is promising. The main technical challenge is to maintain the integrity of the spinous processes during loading. This study aimed to compare different looping materials and techniques with respect to their performance in maintaining spinous process integrity.

Methods: One hundred and five thoracolumbar vertebrae were tested with various looping materials and techniques; the "Tunnel-only" double-loop technique was tested with a synthetic tape (FiberTape®), bovine tendon, and a hybrid tape option. Additionally, the performance of the synthetic tape was tested for other augmentation techniques such as the "Figure-of-eight" looping technique, a double-loop combination of tunneling and cortical wrapping, and a double-loop with "Cortical wrapping only". Biomechanical testing was performed by uniaxial caudo-cranial distraction to failure.

Results: The loads required to cause spinous process failure were lowest with the synthetic tape, followed by tendon and hybrid constructs by tendency (419 N vs. 487 N vs. 519 N) in the "Tunnel-only" double-loop technique. The comparison showed that the "Tunnel + cortical wrapping" technique required significantly higher forces to induce failure compared to other techniques, particularly the "Tunnel only" method (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The choice of the looping technique and material in lumbar interspinous vertebropexy significantly affects the resistance of the spinous process to load. Techniques that incorporate cortical bone and use tendinous material demonstrate superior resistance to higher forces, compared to methods that involve passing synthetic tape through a hole solely within trabecular bone. Additionally, the role of trabecular bone density in the spinous process is relatively minor when cortical bone is utilized as an abutment for the loop.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棘突对不同材料的阻力和棘突间腰椎固定术的袢技术。
目的:半刚性脊柱稳定已被探索作为脊柱融合的替代方法,早期的脊柱段增强术(“椎体固定术”)的经验是有希望的。主要的技术挑战是在加载过程中保持棘突的完整性。本研究旨在比较不同的环材料和技术在维持棘突完整性方面的性能。方法:采用不同的环形材料和技术对105节胸腰椎进行测试;采用合成胶带(FiberTape®)、牛腱和混合胶带对“仅隧道”双环技术进行了测试。此外,对合成胶带的性能进行了其他增强技术的测试,如“8字形”环技术,隧道和皮质包裹的双环组合,以及“仅皮质包裹”的双环。生物力学试验采用单轴尾颅牵张法进行。结果:在“仅隧道”双环技术中,合成带导致棘突断裂所需的载荷最低,其次是肌腱和混合结构(419 N vs 487 N vs 519 N)。比较表明,与其他技术相比,“隧道+皮质包裹”技术需要明显更高的力来诱导失败,特别是“仅隧道”方法(p结论:腰椎棘间椎体固定术中袢技术和材料的选择显着影响棘突对负荷的抵抗。与仅在小梁骨内穿过一个孔的方法相比,结合皮质骨和使用肌腱材料的技术显示出更强的抗外力能力。此外,当皮质骨用作环的基台时,骨小梁骨密度在棘突中的作用相对较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Prognostic value of serum estradiol and sclerostin for predicting fracture healing in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Promoting intervertebral disc fusion using BMP2, L51P, and the EP4 agonist KMN-159: synergistic osteogenesis in human annulus fibrosus cells. Relevance of trigonometric method to achieve the angular correction during pedicule subtraction osteotomy. Role of poor oral hygiene in the etiology of pyogenic spondylitis. Early postoperative recovery of gait efficiency after lumbar decompression: three-month quantitative biomarker assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1