Methods for evaluating unsupervised vector representations of genomic regions.

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2024-08-10 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/nargab/lqae086
Guangtao Zheng, Julia Rymuza, Erfaneh Gharavi, Nathan J LeRoy, Aidong Zhang, Nathan C Sheffield
{"title":"Methods for evaluating unsupervised vector representations of genomic regions.","authors":"Guangtao Zheng, Julia Rymuza, Erfaneh Gharavi, Nathan J LeRoy, Aidong Zhang, Nathan C Sheffield","doi":"10.1093/nargab/lqae086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Representation learning models have become a mainstay of modern genomics. These models are trained to yield vector representations, or embeddings, of various biological entities, such as cells, genes, individuals, or genomic regions. Recent applications of unsupervised embedding approaches have been shown to learn relationships among genomic regions that define functional elements in a genome. Unsupervised representation learning of genomic regions is free of the supervision from curated metadata and can condense rich biological knowledge from publicly available data to region embeddings. However, there exists no method for evaluating the quality of these embeddings in the absence of metadata, making it difficult to assess the reliability of analyses based on the embeddings, and to tune model training to yield optimal results. To bridge this gap, we propose four evaluation metrics: the cluster tendency score (CTS), the reconstruction score (RCS), the genome distance scaling score (GDSS), and the neighborhood preserving score (NPS). The CTS and RCS statistically quantify how well region embeddings can be clustered and how well the embeddings preserve information in training data. The GDSS and NPS exploit the biological tendency of regions close in genomic space to have similar biological functions; they measure how much such information is captured by individual region embeddings in a set. We demonstrate the utility of these statistical and biological scores for evaluating unsupervised genomic region embeddings and provide guidelines for learning reliable embeddings.</p>","PeriodicalId":33994,"journal":{"name":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","volume":"6 3","pages":"lqae086"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqae086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Representation learning models have become a mainstay of modern genomics. These models are trained to yield vector representations, or embeddings, of various biological entities, such as cells, genes, individuals, or genomic regions. Recent applications of unsupervised embedding approaches have been shown to learn relationships among genomic regions that define functional elements in a genome. Unsupervised representation learning of genomic regions is free of the supervision from curated metadata and can condense rich biological knowledge from publicly available data to region embeddings. However, there exists no method for evaluating the quality of these embeddings in the absence of metadata, making it difficult to assess the reliability of analyses based on the embeddings, and to tune model training to yield optimal results. To bridge this gap, we propose four evaluation metrics: the cluster tendency score (CTS), the reconstruction score (RCS), the genome distance scaling score (GDSS), and the neighborhood preserving score (NPS). The CTS and RCS statistically quantify how well region embeddings can be clustered and how well the embeddings preserve information in training data. The GDSS and NPS exploit the biological tendency of regions close in genomic space to have similar biological functions; they measure how much such information is captured by individual region embeddings in a set. We demonstrate the utility of these statistical and biological scores for evaluating unsupervised genomic region embeddings and provide guidelines for learning reliable embeddings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估基因组区域无监督向量表征的方法。
表征学习模型已成为现代基因组学的主流。对这些模型进行训练,可获得各种生物实体(如细胞、基因、个体或基因组区域)的向量表示或嵌入。无监督嵌入方法的最新应用表明,可以学习基因组区域之间的关系,从而定义基因组中的功能元素。基因组区域的无监督表征学习摆脱了编辑元数据的监督,可以将公开数据中丰富的生物学知识浓缩为区域嵌入。然而,在没有元数据的情况下,目前还没有评估这些嵌入质量的方法,因此很难评估基于嵌入的分析的可靠性,也很难调整模型训练以获得最佳结果。为了弥补这一差距,我们提出了四个评估指标:聚类倾向得分(CTS)、重建得分(RCS)、基因组距离缩放得分(GDSS)和邻域保护得分(NPS)。聚类倾向得分(CTS)和重构得分(RCS)从统计学角度量化了区域嵌入的聚类程度和嵌入对训练数据信息的保存程度。GDSS 和 NPS 利用了基因组空间中相近区域具有相似生物功能的生物学趋势;它们衡量了一组数据中单个区域嵌入对此类信息的捕获程度。我们展示了这些统计和生物学评分在评估无监督基因组区域嵌入方面的实用性,并为学习可靠的嵌入提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
95
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Phenotype prediction in plants is improved by integrating large-scale transcriptomic datasets. AntiBody Sequence Database. Approximate nearest neighbor graph provides fast and efficient embedding with applications for large-scale biological data. Cell- and tissue-specific glycosylation pathways informed by single-cell transcriptomics. HiCrayon reveals distinct layers of multi-state 3D chromatin organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1