Association between mandatory bundled payments and changes in socioeconomic disparities for joint replacement outcomes

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14369
Austin S. Kilaru MD MSHP, Joshua M. Liao MD MSc, Erkuan Wang MA, Yueming Zhao MPH, Jingsan Zhu MS MBA, Grace Ng MD MSHP, Torrey Shirk BA, Deborah S. Cousins MSPH, Genevieve P. Kanter PhD, Said Ibrahim MD MPH MBA, Amol S. Navathe MD PhD
{"title":"Association between mandatory bundled payments and changes in socioeconomic disparities for joint replacement outcomes","authors":"Austin S. Kilaru MD MSHP,&nbsp;Joshua M. Liao MD MSc,&nbsp;Erkuan Wang MA,&nbsp;Yueming Zhao MPH,&nbsp;Jingsan Zhu MS MBA,&nbsp;Grace Ng MD MSHP,&nbsp;Torrey Shirk BA,&nbsp;Deborah S. Cousins MSPH,&nbsp;Genevieve P. Kanter PhD,&nbsp;Said Ibrahim MD MPH MBA,&nbsp;Amol S. Navathe MD PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine whether mandatory participation by hospitals in bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) was associated with changes in outcome disparities for patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\n \n <p>We used Medicare claims data for beneficiaries undergoing LEJR in the United States between 2011 and 2017.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective observational study using a differences-in-differences method to compare changes in outcome disparities between dual-eligible and non-dual eligible beneficiaries after hospital participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program. The primary outcome was LEJR complications. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmissions and mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified hospitals in the US market areas eligible for CJR. We included beneficiaries in the intervention group who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets randomized to participate in CJR. The comparison group included patients who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets who were eligible for CJR but randomized to control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 1,603,555 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 74.6 years, 64.3% women, 11.0% dual-eligible). Among participant hospitals, complications decreased between baseline and intervention periods from 11.0% to 10.1% for dual-eligible and 7.0% to 6.4% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. Among nonparticipant hospitals, complications decreased from 10.3% to 9.8% for dual-eligible and 6.7% to 6.0% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. In adjusted analysis, CJR participation was associated with a reduced difference in complications between dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries (−0.9 percentage points, 95% CI −1.6 to −0.1). The reduction in disparities was observed among hospitals without prior experience in a voluntary LEJR bundled payment model. There were no differential changes in 90-day readmissions or mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Mandatory participation in a bundled payment program was associated with reduced disparities in joint replacement complications for Medicare beneficiaries with low income. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of reduced socioeconomic disparities in outcomes under value-based payments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14369","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether mandatory participation by hospitals in bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) was associated with changes in outcome disparities for patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Data Sources and Study Setting

We used Medicare claims data for beneficiaries undergoing LEJR in the United States between 2011 and 2017.

Study Design

We conducted a retrospective observational study using a differences-in-differences method to compare changes in outcome disparities between dual-eligible and non-dual eligible beneficiaries after hospital participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program. The primary outcome was LEJR complications. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmissions and mortality.

Data Extraction Methods

We identified hospitals in the US market areas eligible for CJR. We included beneficiaries in the intervention group who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets randomized to participate in CJR. The comparison group included patients who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets who were eligible for CJR but randomized to control.

Principal Findings

The study included 1,603,555 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 74.6 years, 64.3% women, 11.0% dual-eligible). Among participant hospitals, complications decreased between baseline and intervention periods from 11.0% to 10.1% for dual-eligible and 7.0% to 6.4% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. Among nonparticipant hospitals, complications decreased from 10.3% to 9.8% for dual-eligible and 6.7% to 6.0% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. In adjusted analysis, CJR participation was associated with a reduced difference in complications between dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries (−0.9 percentage points, 95% CI −1.6 to −0.1). The reduction in disparities was observed among hospitals without prior experience in a voluntary LEJR bundled payment model. There were no differential changes in 90-day readmissions or mortality.

Conclusions

Mandatory participation in a bundled payment program was associated with reduced disparities in joint replacement complications for Medicare beneficiaries with low income. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of reduced socioeconomic disparities in outcomes under value-based payments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性捆绑支付与关节置换结果的社会经济差异变化之间的关联。
目的:确定医院强制参与下肢关节置换术(LEJR)的捆绑支付是否与符合医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格患者的治疗结果差异变化有关:确定医院强制参与下肢关节置换术(LEJR)的捆绑支付是否与符合医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格的患者的结果差异变化有关:我们使用了 2011 年至 2017 年期间美国接受下肢关节置换术的受益人的医疗保险报销数据:我们采用差异法进行了一项回顾性观察研究,比较医院参与关节置换综合护理(CJR)计划后,符合双重资格和不符合双重资格的受益人之间的结果差异变化。主要结果是 LEJR 并发症。次要结果包括 90 天再入院率和死亡率:我们确定了美国市场上符合 CJR 条件的医院。我们将在随机参与 CJR 市场的医院接受关节置换术的受益人纳入干预组。对比组包括在符合 CJR 条件但被随机纳入对照组的市场中的医院接受关节置换术的患者:该研究纳入了 1,603,555 名医疗保险受益人(平均年龄 74.6 岁,64.3% 为女性,11.0% 具有双重资格)。在参与医院中,双保险受益人的并发症发生率在基线期和干预期之间从 11.0% 降至 10.1%,非双保险受益人的并发症发生率从 7.0% 降至 6.4%。在非参与医院中,双合格受益人的并发症发生率从 10.3% 降至 9.8%,非双合格受益人的并发症发生率从 6.7% 降至 6.0%。在调整后的分析中,参与 CJR 与双重资格受益人和非双重资格受益人之间并发症的差异减少有关(-0.9 个百分点,95% CI -1.6 至 -0.1)。在未参与过自愿性 LEJR 捆绑付费模式的医院中观察到了差异的缩小。90天再入院率或死亡率没有发生差异变化:结论:强制参与捆绑支付项目与减少低收入医疗保险受益人关节置换并发症的差异有关。据我们所知,这是基于价值的支付模式下社会经济差异减少的首个证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating a predictive model of avoidable hospital events for race- and sex-based bias. Addressing social and health needs in health care: Characterizing case managers' work to address patient-defined goals. Changes in healthcare costs and utilization for Medicaid recipients who received supportive housing through a payer-community-based housing partnership. Exploring the health impacts of climate change: Challenges and considerations for health services research. Commercial insurers' market power and hospital prices in Medicaid managed care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1