Rewiring the organizational network: Corporate offsites and network tie formation

IF 6.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1002/smj.3653
Madeline K. Kneeland, Adam M. Kleinbaum
{"title":"Rewiring the organizational network: Corporate offsites and network tie formation","authors":"Madeline K. Kneeland, Adam M. Kleinbaum","doi":"10.1002/smj.3653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research SummarySocial networks are integral to collaborative work, but research on network change has shed little light on the mechanisms firms use to stimulate collaborative network ties among their employees. In this study, we examine the effects of corporate offsites on the evolution of social networks within an organization. We find that offsites lead to rewiring of intraorganizational networks, but with a surprising asymmetry: they stimulate everyone to <jats:italic>initiate</jats:italic> more collaboration ties, but only those who attend the offsite <jats:italic>receive</jats:italic> more ties. These results are consistent with a conceptualization of offsites as direct interventions that focus on social interactions for those who attend, but also as indirect interventions that signal the value of collaboration to everyone, even those who do not attend.Managerial SummaryCorporate offsites are events that convene people from across a firm to interact outside their regular work environment. Despite their popularity, this article offers the first data‐driven analysis of their effectiveness in promoting collaboration among employees. Offsites facilitate employees' awareness of who knows what, build trust, and foster interpersonal affect among employees. This study shows that offsites have a dual effect on the social network of an organization: they prompt everyone in the firm to initiate more collaborative ties following an offsite, but those who actually attend the offsite attract more of those collaborative tie requests. Therefore, offsites can be a useful tool to boost collaboration—with benefits accruing both to the individuals whose networks grow and to the firm in which they work.","PeriodicalId":22023,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3653","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research SummarySocial networks are integral to collaborative work, but research on network change has shed little light on the mechanisms firms use to stimulate collaborative network ties among their employees. In this study, we examine the effects of corporate offsites on the evolution of social networks within an organization. We find that offsites lead to rewiring of intraorganizational networks, but with a surprising asymmetry: they stimulate everyone to initiate more collaboration ties, but only those who attend the offsite receive more ties. These results are consistent with a conceptualization of offsites as direct interventions that focus on social interactions for those who attend, but also as indirect interventions that signal the value of collaboration to everyone, even those who do not attend.Managerial SummaryCorporate offsites are events that convene people from across a firm to interact outside their regular work environment. Despite their popularity, this article offers the first data‐driven analysis of their effectiveness in promoting collaboration among employees. Offsites facilitate employees' awareness of who knows what, build trust, and foster interpersonal affect among employees. This study shows that offsites have a dual effect on the social network of an organization: they prompt everyone in the firm to initiate more collaborative ties following an offsite, but those who actually attend the offsite attract more of those collaborative tie requests. Therefore, offsites can be a useful tool to boost collaboration—with benefits accruing both to the individuals whose networks grow and to the firm in which they work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新布线组织网络:企业异地办公与网络纽带的形成
研究摘要社会网络是协作工作不可或缺的一部分,但有关网络变化的研究却很少揭示企业用来激发员工之间协作网络联系的机制。在本研究中,我们考察了企业异地办公对组织内部社交网络演变的影响。我们发现,非现场活动会导致组织内部网络的重新布线,但却存在令人惊讶的不对称性:非现场活动会刺激每个人建立更多的协作关系,但只有那些参加了非现场活动的人才会获得更多的关系。这些结果与以下概念是一致的:场外活动是一种直接干预措施,它侧重于参加者的社交互动,同时也是一种间接干预措施,它向每个人,甚至是那些没有参加的人传递协作价值的信号。尽管这些活动很受欢迎,但本文首次对其在促进员工协作方面的效果进行了数据分析。Offites 有助于员工了解谁知道什么、建立信任并促进员工之间的人际关系。本研究表明,非现场会议对组织的社交网络有双重影响:非现场会议促使公司中的每个人在非现场会议后发起更多的协作联系,而那些真正参加非现场会议的人则会吸引更多的协作联系请求。因此,非现场活动可以成为促进合作的有用工具--其网络增长的个人和他们所在的公司都能从中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.40%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: At the Strategic Management Journal, we are committed to publishing top-tier research that addresses key questions in the field of strategic management and captivates scholars in this area. Our publication welcomes manuscripts covering a wide range of topics, perspectives, and research methodologies. As a result, our editorial decisions truly embrace the diversity inherent in the field.
期刊最新文献
What makes activities strategic: Toward a new framework for strategy-as-practice research Gender and racial minorities on corporate boards: How board faultlines and CEO‐minority director overlap affect firm performance Do makerspaces affect entrepreneurship? If so, who, how, and when? Balancing allocative and dynamic efficiency with redundant R&D allocation: The role of organizational proximity and centralization Identifying microfoundations of dynamic managerial capabilities for business model innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1