Institutional trust as a driver of product boycotts in Europe

Nuno Baptista, Maria Dos-Santos, Fernando Mata, Natacha Jesus-Silva
{"title":"Institutional trust as a driver of product boycotts in Europe","authors":"Nuno Baptista, Maria Dos-Santos, Fernando Mata, Natacha Jesus-Silva","doi":"10.1007/s12208-024-00413-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the significant growth in consumer boycotts, research has devoted insufficient attention to the institutional factors that may motivate consumers to engage in such behaviour. This article aims to address this research gap. The main objective is to analyse the factors that affect consumer boycotts from an institutional sustainability perspective, by focusing on a specific dimension of institutional sustainability: institutional trust. Information and data came from the 2023 round of the European Social Survey, a cross-national survey covering 25 Countries. The article applies a binomial univariable logit model to test the influence of institutional trust and other potential drivers on boycott decisions and a multivariable binomial logistic regression to explore possible interrelationship between independent variables. The results confirm that boycotts are affected by institutional trust and other factors including demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the consumers, consumers’ perception of ICT, satisfaction with public institutions, and consumers’ evaluation of personal well-being. This article contributes to political consumerism literature by focusing on the impact of institutional trust in boycotting behaviour. This relationship is underexplored in existing literature, since most literature researches consumer boycotts from a triple-bottom perspective and neglects the effects of the institutional dimension of sustainability in consumer behaviour. The article brings new insights into the motivations of consumers at the political and institutional levels and opens new directions for future research to explore institutional sustainability related to the good practices of governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":42632,"journal":{"name":"International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-024-00413-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the significant growth in consumer boycotts, research has devoted insufficient attention to the institutional factors that may motivate consumers to engage in such behaviour. This article aims to address this research gap. The main objective is to analyse the factors that affect consumer boycotts from an institutional sustainability perspective, by focusing on a specific dimension of institutional sustainability: institutional trust. Information and data came from the 2023 round of the European Social Survey, a cross-national survey covering 25 Countries. The article applies a binomial univariable logit model to test the influence of institutional trust and other potential drivers on boycott decisions and a multivariable binomial logistic regression to explore possible interrelationship between independent variables. The results confirm that boycotts are affected by institutional trust and other factors including demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the consumers, consumers’ perception of ICT, satisfaction with public institutions, and consumers’ evaluation of personal well-being. This article contributes to political consumerism literature by focusing on the impact of institutional trust in boycotting behaviour. This relationship is underexplored in existing literature, since most literature researches consumer boycotts from a triple-bottom perspective and neglects the effects of the institutional dimension of sustainability in consumer behaviour. The article brings new insights into the motivations of consumers at the political and institutional levels and opens new directions for future research to explore institutional sustainability related to the good practices of governance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机构信任是欧洲产品抵制的驱动力
尽管消费者抵制行为大幅增长,但研究对可能促使消费者采取这种行为的制度因素关注不够。本文旨在弥补这一研究空白。主要目的是从制度可持续性的角度分析影响消费者抵制行为的因素,重点关注制度可持续性的一个特定维度:制度信任。信息和数据来自 2023 年的欧洲社会调查,这是一项覆盖 25 个国家的跨国调查。文章采用二叉单变量 logit 模型检验了制度信任和其他潜在驱动因素对抵制决定的影响,并采用多变量二叉 logistic 回归探讨了独立变量之间可能存在的相互关系。结果证实,抵制行为受到机构信任和其他因素的影响,包括消费者的人口和社会经济特征、消费者对信息和通信技术的认知、对公共机构的满意度以及消费者对个人福祉的评价。本文通过关注机构信任对抵制行为的影响,为政治消费主义文献做出了贡献。现有文献对这一关系的研究不足,因为大多数文献都是从三重底线的角度研究消费者抵制行为,而忽视了可持续发展的制度维度对消费者行为的影响。文章对消费者在政治和制度层面的动机提出了新的见解,并为今后探索与良好治理实践相关的制度可持续性开辟了新的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, an international scientific journal, publishes English-language articles and case reports in the field of public and nonprofit marketing and closely related disciplines. Relevant doctoral thesis reviews and book reviews are also welcome. The main objective of the Review is to foster the study of marketing topics from an interdisciplinary perspective and provide a forum for researchers interested in examining these issues from practical and theoretical viewpoints. Establishing a common vocabulary with which to discuss methods, procedures, results and experiences will improve the exchange of ideas between participants of varied backgrounds. To be accessible to a diverse community of academics and professionals, the Review will only accept articles that display strict scientific rigor and excellent expository clarity. First-rate scientific quality is guaranteed by a large editorial board composed of internationally recognized experts from prestigious academic and research institutions. Papers submitted for publication are evaluated through a double blind refereeing process. Manuscripts should not exceed 20 pages (450 words per page). This page limit includes all figures, tables, appendices and references. Officially cited as: Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark
期刊最新文献
Unravelling customer gratitude: navigating the literature and paving the way forward with the TCCM framework Frugal people give more? The moderating role of beneficiary number in eliciting donation intention Rendering misery or selling hope? The mechanism of imagery contrast effect in charitable appeal Institutional trust as a driver of product boycotts in Europe The role of engagement in retaining volunteers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1