{"title":"Associations of Parent Feeding Practice Profiles With Feeding Styles, Child Diet Quality, and the Home Food Environment","authors":"Amara Channell Doig PhD, MPH, Leah Lipsky PhD, MHS, Grace Shearrer PhD, Tonja Nansel PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) is a validated measure of 12 aspects of parent feeding that have been associated with child dietary intake and health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate latent profiles of CFPQ subscales (ie, patterns of individual responses) and test relationships with parental feeding styles (ie, authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, uninvolved), child adherence to dietary guidelines, and the home food environment.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Secondary analysis of data from 118 maternal-child dyads in North Carolina assessed at child ages 3 and 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Profiles of the 12 CFPQ subscales were examined using Latent Profile Analysis. Multinomial regression estimated associations of CFPQ latent profiles with feeding styles measured by the Caregiver Feeding Styles Questionnaire (CFSQ). Linear regression examined associations of profile membership with child Healthy Eating Index 2020 (HEI) overall and separately for adequacy (eg, fruit, vegetables, whole grains, HEI-adq) and moderation (eg, refined grains, sodium, HEI-mod) components. Associations of the Home Food Inventory obesogenic score (HFI-OB) and fruit/vegetable score (HFI-FV) with CFPQ latent profiles were estimated using ANOVA. Significance was set at p<0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fit indices (BIC and ICL) supported a three-profile model: 1 high supportive and low controlling practices, 2 high controlling and high supportive practices, and 3 moderate controlling and low supportive practices. CFSQ feeding styles did not predict CFPQ latent profile membership. Total HEI, HEI-adq and HEI-mod were lower in profile 1 than profile 3 (Total HEI β=-5.85, p=0.05; HEI-adq β=-3.65, p=0.06; HEI-mod β=-2.19, p=0.11). HFI-OB was lower in profile 1 than profile 2 (mean difference= -4.85, 95%CI= -9.00 - 0.70) and profile 3 (mean difference= -4.68, 95%CI= -8.40 - -0.97). HFI-FV was higher for profile 1 than profile 3 (mean difference= 3.30, 95%CI= 0.10-6.49).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Profiles of parents who have high supportive and low controlling feeding practices were associated with improved diet quality and home food environment compared to parents who had high controlling and high supportive or moderate controlling and low supportive practices.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>NIH</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Page S36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) is a validated measure of 12 aspects of parent feeding that have been associated with child dietary intake and health outcomes.
Objective
To investigate latent profiles of CFPQ subscales (ie, patterns of individual responses) and test relationships with parental feeding styles (ie, authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, uninvolved), child adherence to dietary guidelines, and the home food environment.
Study Design, Settings, Participants
Secondary analysis of data from 118 maternal-child dyads in North Carolina assessed at child ages 3 and 5 years.
Measurable Outcome/Analysis
Profiles of the 12 CFPQ subscales were examined using Latent Profile Analysis. Multinomial regression estimated associations of CFPQ latent profiles with feeding styles measured by the Caregiver Feeding Styles Questionnaire (CFSQ). Linear regression examined associations of profile membership with child Healthy Eating Index 2020 (HEI) overall and separately for adequacy (eg, fruit, vegetables, whole grains, HEI-adq) and moderation (eg, refined grains, sodium, HEI-mod) components. Associations of the Home Food Inventory obesogenic score (HFI-OB) and fruit/vegetable score (HFI-FV) with CFPQ latent profiles were estimated using ANOVA. Significance was set at p<0.05.
Results
Fit indices (BIC and ICL) supported a three-profile model: 1 high supportive and low controlling practices, 2 high controlling and high supportive practices, and 3 moderate controlling and low supportive practices. CFSQ feeding styles did not predict CFPQ latent profile membership. Total HEI, HEI-adq and HEI-mod were lower in profile 1 than profile 3 (Total HEI β=-5.85, p=0.05; HEI-adq β=-3.65, p=0.06; HEI-mod β=-2.19, p=0.11). HFI-OB was lower in profile 1 than profile 2 (mean difference= -4.85, 95%CI= -9.00 - 0.70) and profile 3 (mean difference= -4.68, 95%CI= -8.40 - -0.97). HFI-FV was higher for profile 1 than profile 3 (mean difference= 3.30, 95%CI= 0.10-6.49).
Conclusions
Profiles of parents who have high supportive and low controlling feeding practices were associated with improved diet quality and home food environment compared to parents who had high controlling and high supportive or moderate controlling and low supportive practices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.