Scoping Review of the Relationship Between Non-Food Social Safety Net Programs and Food Security

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.081
{"title":"Scoping Review of the Relationship Between Non-Food Social Safety Net Programs and Food Security","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Households with low incomes are more likely to experience food and nutrition insecurity due to limited financial resources for necessities. Social safety net programs may improve food and nutrition security by relieving households’ financial strain. Although the relationship between federal nutrition assistance programs and food security is well understood, to date, no reviews have been conducted on the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food and nutrition security. This evidence is needed to inform evidence-driven policymaking, particularly in the context of increasing food insecurity in recent years.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Conduct a scoping review to summarize the state of the evidence on the relationship between participation in non-food social safety net programs in the US and food and nutrition security.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>We systematically searched 6 databases for peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food security, nutrition security, or related constructs.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sr)</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five articles have been identified that examine a wide range of social safety net programs including tax credits (n=14), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (n=11), Medicaid (n=9), housing assistance (n=5), unemployment insurance (n=9), stimulus payments (n=4), and others (n=13). Twenty-one studies focus on COVID-19 pandemic-era social safety net programs. We will synthesize across studies to describe differences in the relationship between social safety net program participation and food or nutrition security by: program type, multiple vs. single program participation, food vs. nutrition insecurity, participant demographics, and elements of program administration such as disbursement method. We will identify gaps in the existing evidence base and directions for future research. Full results are forthcoming.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A review on the relationship between non-food social safety net program participation and food and nutrition security can inform policymaking, resource allocation, and efforts to ensure the potential nutrition benefits of such programs are realized equally among participants.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Robert Wood Johnson Foundation</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Households with low incomes are more likely to experience food and nutrition insecurity due to limited financial resources for necessities. Social safety net programs may improve food and nutrition security by relieving households’ financial strain. Although the relationship between federal nutrition assistance programs and food security is well understood, to date, no reviews have been conducted on the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food and nutrition security. This evidence is needed to inform evidence-driven policymaking, particularly in the context of increasing food insecurity in recent years.

Objective

Conduct a scoping review to summarize the state of the evidence on the relationship between participation in non-food social safety net programs in the US and food and nutrition security.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

We systematically searched 6 databases for peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food security, nutrition security, or related constructs.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sr)

Results

Sixty-five articles have been identified that examine a wide range of social safety net programs including tax credits (n=14), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (n=11), Medicaid (n=9), housing assistance (n=5), unemployment insurance (n=9), stimulus payments (n=4), and others (n=13). Twenty-one studies focus on COVID-19 pandemic-era social safety net programs. We will synthesize across studies to describe differences in the relationship between social safety net program participation and food or nutrition security by: program type, multiple vs. single program participation, food vs. nutrition insecurity, participant demographics, and elements of program administration such as disbursement method. We will identify gaps in the existing evidence base and directions for future research. Full results are forthcoming.

Conclusions

A review on the relationship between non-food social safety net program participation and food and nutrition security can inform policymaking, resource allocation, and efforts to ensure the potential nutrition benefits of such programs are realized equally among participants.

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非粮食社会安全网计划与粮食安全之间关系的范围审查
背景低收入家庭由于用于购买生活必需品的经济资源有限,更有可能遭遇粮食和营养不安全问题。社会安全网计划可以缓解家庭的经济压力,从而改善食品和营养安全状况。尽管联邦营养援助计划与粮食安全之间的关系已为人们所熟知,但迄今为止,尚未对非食品社会安全网计划与粮食和营养安全之间的关系进行过审查。研究设计、设置、参与者我们系统地检索了 6 个数据库,以查找经同行评审的研究,这些研究考察了非食品社会安全网计划与食品安全、营养安全或相关结构之间的关系。可衡量的结果/分析系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目扩展(PRISMA-SR)结果我们发现有 65 篇文章研究了一系列社会安全网计划,包括税收抵免(14 篇)、贫困家庭临时救助(11 篇)、医疗补助(9 篇)、住房援助(5 篇)、失业保险(9 篇)、刺激性付款(4 篇)及其他(13 篇)。21 项研究关注 COVID-19 大流行时期的社会安全网计划。我们将对各项研究进行综合,以描述社会安全网计划的参与与食物或营养安全之间的关系差异,研究内容包括:计划类型、多重计划参与与单一计划参与、食物不安全与营养不安全、参与者人口统计以及计划管理要素(如支付方法)。我们将找出现有证据基础的不足之处以及未来研究的方向。结论 对非食品社会安全网计划的参与与食品和营养安全之间的关系进行回顾,可以为政策制定、资源分配和努力确保此类计划的潜在营养益处在参与者中平等实现提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of a Fresh Produce Intervention for Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses. Development of Educational Whiteboard Videos for Head Start Teachers on How to Implement Food-based Learning in the Preschool Classroom. Deciphering Dichos for Nutrition and Health Discussion: A Qualitative Study Among Men of Mexican Origin With or At-Risk of Type 2 Diabetes. Acceptability of Pilot School-based Food Pantries Compared With Weekend Feeding BackPack Programs Among Food Pantry Clients in Rural Tennessee: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1