Barriers and Motivators for Grocery Store Stakeholders Implementing Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.006
{"title":"Barriers and Motivators for Grocery Store Stakeholders Implementing Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In recent years, there has been an increase in Produce Incentive Programs (PIPs) to motivate low-income families to purchase fresh produce. Research examining best practices for implementation of these program remains limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine barriers and motivators for implementing PIPs in grocery store settings.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>In depth, semi-structured interviews (via Zoom) were conducted with grocery store stakeholders involved in the Double Up Food Bucks New York (DUFBNY) PIP serving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries. Study participants included DUFBNY program staff who support DUFBNY grocery stores and their employees. Recruitment flyers were emailed to program staff and DUFBNY grocery stores. This study was conducted between February 2023 and September 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Two research assistants independently coded interviews transcripts in Atlas.ti. using a mixed deductive (ie, interview questions guided some of the coding) and inductive (ie, open coding was used to allow codes to emerge from the data) approach. The outcomes assessed were program perceptions, barriers, and motivators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (n=18, 5 program staff and 13 grocery store workers) underscored perceived barriers and motivators for implementation: 1) program differences (barrier), 2) staff burden (barrier), 3) community engagement (motivator) and 4) PIP recipients’ enthusiasm (motivator). In order for the program to run at different types of stores, there were several variations in the way the program was implemented. These differences often created confusion among stakeholders. The program created some burden for grocery store staff, as the transaction process was often cumbersome. Despite these challenges, both community engagement and participant enthusiasm were mentioned as a priority, and motivated interviewees’ continued support of the program.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although grocery stores implementing PIPs can find these initiatives to be valuable, more research is needed into how PIPs can be implemented across multiple consumer food environments, and how to ease the burden off grocery store workers. Collaboration between different stakeholders is necessary for achieving program growth and sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>USDA</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In recent years, there has been an increase in Produce Incentive Programs (PIPs) to motivate low-income families to purchase fresh produce. Research examining best practices for implementation of these program remains limited.

Objective

To examine barriers and motivators for implementing PIPs in grocery store settings.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

In depth, semi-structured interviews (via Zoom) were conducted with grocery store stakeholders involved in the Double Up Food Bucks New York (DUFBNY) PIP serving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries. Study participants included DUFBNY program staff who support DUFBNY grocery stores and their employees. Recruitment flyers were emailed to program staff and DUFBNY grocery stores. This study was conducted between February 2023 and September 2023.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Two research assistants independently coded interviews transcripts in Atlas.ti. using a mixed deductive (ie, interview questions guided some of the coding) and inductive (ie, open coding was used to allow codes to emerge from the data) approach. The outcomes assessed were program perceptions, barriers, and motivators.

Results

Participants (n=18, 5 program staff and 13 grocery store workers) underscored perceived barriers and motivators for implementation: 1) program differences (barrier), 2) staff burden (barrier), 3) community engagement (motivator) and 4) PIP recipients’ enthusiasm (motivator). In order for the program to run at different types of stores, there were several variations in the way the program was implemented. These differences often created confusion among stakeholders. The program created some burden for grocery store staff, as the transaction process was often cumbersome. Despite these challenges, both community engagement and participant enthusiasm were mentioned as a priority, and motivated interviewees’ continued support of the program.

Conclusions

Although grocery stores implementing PIPs can find these initiatives to be valuable, more research is needed into how PIPs can be implemented across multiple consumer food environments, and how to ease the burden off grocery store workers. Collaboration between different stakeholders is necessary for achieving program growth and sustainability.

Funding

USDA

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杂货店利益相关者实施果蔬激励计划的障碍和动力
背景近年来,激励低收入家庭购买新鲜农产品的 "农产品激励计划"(PIPs)越来越多。研究设计、环境、参与者对参与 "纽约双倍食物券"(DUFBNY)PIP 的杂货店利益相关者进行了深入的半结构化访谈(通过 Zoom),访谈对象为 "纽约双倍食物券"(DUFBNY)PIP 的杂货店利益相关者,访谈对象为 "纽约双倍食物券"(DUFBNY)PIP 的补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益者。研究参与者包括为 DUFBNY 杂货店及其员工提供支持的 DUFBNY 项目工作人员。招募传单通过电子邮件发送给项目员工和 DUFBNY 杂货店。本研究在 2023 年 2 月至 2023 年 9 月期间进行。可衡量的结果/分析两名研究助理在 Atlas.ti 中使用混合演绎法(即访谈问题引导部分编码)和归纳法(即使用开放式编码允许从数据中产生编码)对访谈记录进行独立编码。评估的结果包括项目认知、障碍和激励因素。结果参与者(人数=18,其中 5 人为项目工作人员,13 人为杂货店工作人员)强调了项目实施过程中的障碍和激励因素:1) 计划差异(障碍);2) 员工负担(障碍);3) 社区参与(激励因素);4) PIP 受益人的热情(激励因素)。为了在不同类型的商店实施该计划,计划的实施方式也有若干差异。这些差异经常在利益相关者之间造成混乱。该计划给杂货店员工造成了一定的负担,因为交易过程往往很繁琐。尽管存在这些挑战,但社区参与和参与者的热情都被视为优先事项,并促使受访者继续支持该计划。结论尽管实施 PIP 的杂货店会发现这些举措很有价值,但对于如何在多种食品消费环境中实施 PIP,以及如何减轻杂货店员工的负担,还需要进行更多的研究。不同利益相关者之间的合作对于实现计划的发展和可持续性是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
Common Feeding Practices Used by Chinese Caregivers of 6-10-Month-Old Infants: A Behavioral Observation Study in Shaanxi Province. A Proposed Cost-Benefit Analysis of Adult EFNEP Utilizing Biomarkers of Chronic Disease Risk. Table of Contents Students’ Perspectives on the Benefits and Challenges of Universal School Meals Related to Food Accessibility, Stigma, Participation, and Waste Evaluating the Validity of the PortionSize Smartphone Application for Estimating Dietary Intake in Free-Living Conditions: A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1