{"title":"Do Measures of Psychological Resilience Vary With Self-Perceived Body Weight Status?","authors":"Jason Alme BS, Jesse Stabile Morrell PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Research suggests underestimation of body weight may be associated with beneficial psychological resilience against consequences of obesity, compared with accurate perception. Less is known about the comparison between those who underestimate versus those who overestimate their body weight.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate differences in life satisfaction, social/emotional support, and weight change intentions between those who underestimate vs overestimate vs accurately perceive their body weight.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Data were collected between 2008-2023 from the College Health and Nutrition Assessment Survey, a cross-sectional study of undergraduates, ages 18-24 years. After exclusions for missing data, the final sample (n=8203) was 93.9% white, 69.3% female, and had a mean age of 18.9±1.1.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Weight self-perception, weight change intent, life satisfaction, and social/emotional support, were measured via online survey. BMI (kg/m2) was calculated via height and weight measured by technicians, then compared with weight self-perception to determine self-perception accuracy. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate differences between self-perception accuracy categories.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>About two-thirds (68.9%) perceived their weight category accurately, while one-third (31.1%) misperceived, with 19.5% underestimating and 11.6% overestimating. Women were more likely to overestimate (14.7% vs. 4.6%, p<.001), while men were more likely to underestimate their weight (37.5% vs. 11.6%, p<.001). Underestimaters were more likely to report weight maintenance intent or no weight change intent vs. overestimaters (33.2% vs. 14.2%, p<.001). Overestimaters were less likely to report high life satisfaction compared with underestimators and accurate perceivers (19.9% vs. 35.8% vs. 33.4%, p<.001). No differences in self-reported social support between groups were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In young adults, data suggest underestimation of weight was associated with less intentional weight change behavior and higher life satisfaction. These results may help guide practitioners working with young adults by revealing differing patterns in weight misperception.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>NIFA, New Hampshire Agriculture Experiment Station, USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Project 1010738, and the State of New Hampshire</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Page S7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Research suggests underestimation of body weight may be associated with beneficial psychological resilience against consequences of obesity, compared with accurate perception. Less is known about the comparison between those who underestimate versus those who overestimate their body weight.
Objective
To investigate differences in life satisfaction, social/emotional support, and weight change intentions between those who underestimate vs overestimate vs accurately perceive their body weight.
Study Design, Settings, Participants
Data were collected between 2008-2023 from the College Health and Nutrition Assessment Survey, a cross-sectional study of undergraduates, ages 18-24 years. After exclusions for missing data, the final sample (n=8203) was 93.9% white, 69.3% female, and had a mean age of 18.9±1.1.
Measurable Outcome/Analysis
Weight self-perception, weight change intent, life satisfaction, and social/emotional support, were measured via online survey. BMI (kg/m2) was calculated via height and weight measured by technicians, then compared with weight self-perception to determine self-perception accuracy. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate differences between self-perception accuracy categories.
Results
About two-thirds (68.9%) perceived their weight category accurately, while one-third (31.1%) misperceived, with 19.5% underestimating and 11.6% overestimating. Women were more likely to overestimate (14.7% vs. 4.6%, p<.001), while men were more likely to underestimate their weight (37.5% vs. 11.6%, p<.001). Underestimaters were more likely to report weight maintenance intent or no weight change intent vs. overestimaters (33.2% vs. 14.2%, p<.001). Overestimaters were less likely to report high life satisfaction compared with underestimators and accurate perceivers (19.9% vs. 35.8% vs. 33.4%, p<.001). No differences in self-reported social support between groups were observed.
Conclusions
In young adults, data suggest underestimation of weight was associated with less intentional weight change behavior and higher life satisfaction. These results may help guide practitioners working with young adults by revealing differing patterns in weight misperception.
Funding
NIFA, New Hampshire Agriculture Experiment Station, USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Project 1010738, and the State of New Hampshire
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.