Consumer willingness to pay for emission reduction in air travel: A meta-analysis

IF 7.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104347
{"title":"Consumer willingness to pay for emission reduction in air travel: A meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2024.104347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Air travel contributes a substantial share of global greenhouse gas emissions and is projected to rise. To reduce emissions, airlines and policymakers must understand consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for reductions. Several studies have been conducted for this purpose, with considerable variation in reported WTP values. This paper undertakes a meta-analysis and qualitative review to better understand the key factors influencing WTP drawn from 31 primary studies. A major finding is that WTP could be more than double for a credible offsetting scheme compared to one lacking credibility. Additionally, framing the offset as “per flight” rather than “per tonne CO<sub>2</sub>” increases WTP, while there appears to be no differential impact of a voluntary versus mandatory schemes. As expected, WTP increases in income, education, and pro-environmental attitudes. The results yield important insights for the design of effective carbon offsetting schemes, thereby enhancing sustainability of aviation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924003043/pdfft?md5=81958a1c103e2271f074ee11a24ac48f&pid=1-s2.0-S1361920924003043-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924003043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air travel contributes a substantial share of global greenhouse gas emissions and is projected to rise. To reduce emissions, airlines and policymakers must understand consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for reductions. Several studies have been conducted for this purpose, with considerable variation in reported WTP values. This paper undertakes a meta-analysis and qualitative review to better understand the key factors influencing WTP drawn from 31 primary studies. A major finding is that WTP could be more than double for a credible offsetting scheme compared to one lacking credibility. Additionally, framing the offset as “per flight” rather than “per tonne CO2” increases WTP, while there appears to be no differential impact of a voluntary versus mandatory schemes. As expected, WTP increases in income, education, and pro-environmental attitudes. The results yield important insights for the design of effective carbon offsetting schemes, thereby enhancing sustainability of aviation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对航空旅行减排的支付意愿:荟萃分析
航空旅行在全球温室气体排放中占很大比例,而且预计还会增加。为了减少排放,航空公司和政策制定者必须了解消费者的偏好和减排支付意愿(WTP)。为此已进行了多项研究,但报告的 WTP 值差异很大。本文通过荟萃分析和定性审查,更好地了解了影响 WTP 的关键因素,这些因素来自 31 项主要研究。一个主要发现是,与缺乏可信度的抵消计划相比,可信度高的抵消计划的 WTP 可能会增加一倍以上。此外,以 "每次飞行 "而不是 "每吨二氧化碳 "为框架的抵消方案会增加 WTP,而自愿与强制方案似乎没有不同的影响。正如预期的那样,收入、教育程度和环保态度越高,WTP 越高。研究结果为设计有效的碳补偿计划提供了重要启示,从而提高了航空业的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
314
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of the price premium for eco vessels Extreme particulate matter exposure at traffic intersections in a densely populated city Are shared automated vehicles good for public- or private-transport-oriented cities (or neither)? Factors affecting crossing structure use by khulan and goitered gazelle in China Maritime accident risk prediction integrating weather data using machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1